AIMS: Prediction of post-intervention fractional flow reserve (FFR) in a diffuse or sequential coronary lesion is difficult due to complex haemodynamic interactions between individual stenoses. Furthermore, the existence of a residual intra-stent pressure gradient makes the prediction difficult. We developed an equation predicting the post-intervention FFR in a diffuse/sequential lesion by considering intra-stent FFR gradient. The present study aims to validate the equation in an in vitro model and in clinical data. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the in vitro experiment, three sequential coronary stenoses were made with a collateral flow. The correlation coefficient of the predicted FFR and the actual post-intervention FFR was 0.99, and the absolute difference was 0.008±0.006 (n=50). In the clinical data analysis, the correlation coefficient was 0.41, and the absolute difference was 0.06±0.05 (n=67). We applied a fixed value of intra-stent FFR gradient and a collateral flow index so that the equation can be used in clinical practice. The correlation coefficient became 0.28 and the absolute difference became 0.06±0.06. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, prediction of post-intervention FFR in a diffuse/sequential lesion is difficult even when residual intra-stent pressure gradient is considered.
AIMS: Prediction of post-intervention fractional flow reserve (FFR) in a diffuse or sequential coronary lesion is difficult due to complex haemodynamic interactions between individual stenoses. Furthermore, the existence of a residual intra-stent pressure gradient makes the prediction difficult. We developed an equation predicting the post-intervention FFR in a diffuse/sequential lesion by considering intra-stent FFR gradient. The present study aims to validate the equation in an in vitro model and in clinical data. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the in vitro experiment, three sequential coronary stenoses were made with a collateral flow. The correlation coefficient of the predicted FFR and the actual post-intervention FFR was 0.99, and the absolute difference was 0.008±0.006 (n=50). In the clinical data analysis, the correlation coefficient was 0.41, and the absolute difference was 0.06±0.05 (n=67). We applied a fixed value of intra-stent FFR gradient and a collateral flow index so that the equation can be used in clinical practice. The correlation coefficient became 0.28 and the absolute difference became 0.06±0.06. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, prediction of post-intervention FFR in a diffuse/sequential lesion is difficult even when residual intra-stent pressure gradient is considered.
Authors: Franz-Josef Neumann; Miguel Sousa-Uva; Anders Ahlsson; Fernando Alfonso; Adrian P Banning; Umberto Benedetto; Robert A Byrne; Jean-Philippe Collet; Volkmar Falk; Stuart J Head; Peter Jüni; Adnan Kastrati; Akos Koller; Steen D Kristensen; Josef Niebauer; Dimitrios J Richter; Petar M Seferovic; Dirk Sibbing; Giulio G Stefanini; Stephan Windecker; Rashmi Yadav; Michael O Zembala Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Philip B Dattilo; Anand Prasad; Emily Honeycutt; Tracy Y Wang; John C Messenger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Marcel van' t Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; William F Fearon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul Erne; Andreas W Schoenenberger; Dieter Burckhardt; Michel Zuber; Wolfgang Kiowski; Peter T Buser; Paul Dubach; Therese J Resink; Matthias Pfisterer Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lokien X van Nunen; Frederik M Zimmermann; Pim A L Tonino; Emanuele Barbato; Andreas Baumbach; Thomas Engstrøm; Volker Klauss; Philip A MacCarthy; Ganesh Manoharan; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Marcel Van't Veer; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-08-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690