Literature DB >> 22157476

The impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on clinical outcomes after transradial coronary stenting.

Massoud A Leesar1, Aaron Satran, Venkata Yalamanchili, Tarek Helmy, Mohammad Abdul-Waheed, Nattawut Wongpraparut.   

Abstract

AIMS: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≥0.96 after stenting correlates well with an optimal stent expansion, but outcomes based on FFR after drug eluting stents (DES) have not been studied. This study sought to investigate the proportion of patients in whom an FFR ≥0.96 can be achieved after transradial stenting using primarily DES and to determine outcomes based on a post-stent FFR ≥0.96 vs. an FFR<0.96. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 66 patients with single-vessel disease and FFR<0.75 underwent transradial stenting. After stenting, FFR was <0.96 in 34 patients and there was a hyperaemic trans-stent gradient across the edges of stent in five patients; after high-pressure balloon inflation, FFR increased to ≥0.96 in three patients and an FFR ≥0.96 was achieved in 35 patients (53%, group 1), but FFR remained <0.96 in 31 patients (47%, group 2). There was no correlation between FFR and minimum lumen diameter in group 1 or group 2 (r=0.03; p=0.72 and r=0.02; p=0.22, respectively). The 24-month event-free survival estimate defined as freedom from death, MI, and target vessel revascularisation (PCI or CABG) was significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2 (94% versus 72%, respectively; p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: After transradial stenting with predominately DES, an FFR ≥0.96 was achieved in only 53% of patients and event rates among patients with a post-stent FFR ≥0.96 were significantly lower than those with an FFR<0.96.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22157476     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I8A145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  9 in total

1.  Prediction of post-intervention fractional flow reserve in diffuse or sequential coronary stenosis considering the residual trans-stent pressure gradient: Post-intervention FFR in diffuse/sequential lesions.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Song; Naritatsu Saito; Yoshiaki Kawase; Yusuke Yoshikawa; Erika Yamamoto; Munenori Okubo; Hiroki Shiomi; Shin Watanabe; Takeshi Kimura; Hitoshi Matsuo
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2020-07-20

2.  Prognostic value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention diastolic pressure ratio.

Authors:  K Masdjedi; L J C van Zandvoort; T Neleman; I Kardys; J Ligthart; W K Den Dekker; R Diletti; F Zijlstra; N M Van Mieghem; J Daemen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.854

Review 3.  Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Wolfrum; Gregor Fahrni; Giovanni Luigi de Maria; Guido Knapp; Nick Curzen; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Georg M Fröhlich; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 4.  Physiologic Assessment after Coronary Stent Implantation.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Seokhun Yang; Jinlong Zhang; Bon Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 5.  Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: State of the Art.

Authors:  Alessandra Scoccia; Mariusz Tomaniak; Tara Neleman; Frederik T W Groenland; Annemieke C Ziedses des Plantes; Joost Daemen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  Coronary Flow Variations Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Affect Diastolic Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios More Than the Whole Cycle Ratios.

Authors:  Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-Rahman; Tian X Zhao; Kitty Paques; Joana Oliveira; Bharat Khialani; Stephen Kyranis; Denise M Braganza; Sarah C Clarke; Martin R Bennett; Nick E J West; Stephen P Hoole
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.106

7.  Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Jinlong Zhang; Jiesuck Park; Seokhun Yang; Minsang Kim; Jun Pil Yun; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Shao-Liang Chen; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Gabor G Toth; Zsolt Piroth; Nils P Johnson; Nico H J Pijls; Abdul Hakeem; Barry F Uretsky; Yohei Hokama; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hong-Seok Lim; Tsuyoshi Ito; Akiko Matsuo; Lorenzo Azzalini; Massoud A Leesar; Tara Neleman; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Roberto Diletti; Joost Daemen; Damien Collison; Carlos Collet; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 8.  Non-hyperaemic pressure ratios to guide percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Michael Michail; Udit Thakur; Ojas Mehta; John M Ramzy; Andrea Comella; Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid; James D Cameron; Stephen J Nicholls; Stephen P Hoole; Adam J Brown
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-10

9.  Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR).

Authors:  Damien Collison; Matthaios Didagelos; Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-Rahman; Samuel Copt; Robert McDade; Peter McCartney; Thomas J Ford; John McClure; Mitchell Lindsay; Aadil Shaukat; Paul Rocchiccioli; Richard Brogan; Stuart Watkins; Margaret McEntegart; Richard Good; Keith Robertson; Patrick O'Boyle; Andrew Davie; Adnan Khan; Stuart Hood; Hany Eteiba; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 29.983

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.