Literature DB >> 22921996

Validation of functional state of coronary tandem lesions using computational flow dynamics.

Seung-Jung Park1, Jung-Min Ahn, Nico H J Pijls, Bernard De Bruyne, Eun Bo Shim, Young-Tae Kim, Soo-Jin Kang, Haegeun Song, Jong-Young Lee, Won-Jang Kim, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Cheol Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park.   

Abstract

Functional lesion assessment for coronary tandem lesions and its clinical applications have not been thoroughly studied. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the fractional flow reserve (FFR) gradient across an individual stenosis (ΔFFR) during pressure-wire pullback is a surrogate of the relative functional severity of each stenosis in coronary tandem lesions. For in vitro validation, computational flow dynamic modeling of coronary tandem lesion with various degree of stenosis was constructed. For clinical validation, a total of 52 patients (104 lesions) with coronary tandem lesions (2 stenoses along 1 coronary artery) were consecutively enrolled, and tailored stent procedures based on ΔFFR was performed, at first treating the lesion with large ΔFFR and then subsequently reassessing the FFR for the remaining lesion. The coronary stenosis was considered functionally significant and stenting was performed when the FFR of a lesion was ≤0.80. Using in vitro computational flow dynamic modeling, the lesion with the large ΔFFR of the coronary tandem lesion was indicated as the lesion with the greater degree of simulated diameter stenosis. In the clinical cohort, 28 patients (53.8%) had only single-lesion treatment, and stent implantation for 28 lesions (26.9%) was deferred according to the proposed strategy. During the 9-month follow-up period, only 1 repeat revascularization occurred among the deferred lesions. In conclusion, for the treatment of coronary tandem lesions, ΔFFR may be a useful index for prioritizing the treatment sequence and optimizing the stenting procedure. In this way, unnecessary stent implantation can be avoided, with the achievement of favorable functional and clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921996     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  Predicting functional significance of each stenosis in serial coronary artery stenoses: Where there is a will, there is a way.

Authors:  Mineok Chang; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  A simplified formula to calculate fractional flow reserve in sequential lesions circumventing the measurement of coronary wedge pressure: The APIS-S pilot study.

Authors:  Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Carlos Cortés; Miłosz Jaguszewski; Michele Schincariol; Ignacio J Amat-Santos; Juan A Franco-Peláez; Grzegorz Żuk; Dariusz Ciećwierz; Wojciech Wojakowski; Felipe Navarro; Shengxian Tu; Borja Ibáñez
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Catheter-based functional metrics of the coronary circulation.

Authors:  Panagiotis Xaplanteris; Emanuele Barbato; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Physiology-Guided Management of Serial/Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Christopher S G Murray; Tariq Siddiqui; Norma Keller; Solaiman Chowdhury; Tamanna Nahar
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Prediction of post-intervention fractional flow reserve in diffuse or sequential coronary stenosis considering the residual trans-stent pressure gradient: Post-intervention FFR in diffuse/sequential lesions.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Song; Naritatsu Saito; Yoshiaki Kawase; Yusuke Yoshikawa; Erika Yamamoto; Munenori Okubo; Hiroki Shiomi; Shin Watanabe; Takeshi Kimura; Hitoshi Matsuo
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2020-07-20

Review 6.  Clinical Relevance of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve: Art-of-state.

Authors:  Yohanes Adiputra; Shao-Liang Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  ANMCO/GICR-IACPR/SICI-GISE Consensus Document: the clinical management of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Carmine Riccio; Michele Massimo Gulizia; Furio Colivicchi; Andrea Di Lenarda; Giuseppe Musumeci; Pompilio Massimo Faggiano; Maurizio Giuseppe Abrignani; Roberta Rossini; Francesco Fattirolli; Serafina Valente; Gian Francesco Mureddu; Pier Luigi Temporelli; Zoran Olivari; Antonio Francesco Amico; Giancarlo Casolo; Claudio Fresco; Alberto Menozzi; Federico Nardi
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 1.803

Review 8.  Comparison of coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging with fractional flow reserve for coronary artery disease evaluation: An anatomical-functional mismatch.

Authors:  Julien Adjedj; Nikolay Stoyanov; Olivier Muller
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.596

9.  New Mathematical Correction Model in Pursuit of Optimal Hemodynamic Assessment of Serial Coronary Artery Disease: Overcoming Hyperemic Cross Talk Between Coronary Stenoses in Series?

Authors:  Murat Sezer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Physiology-Based Revascularization of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Peter Kayaert; Mathieu Coeman; Sofie Gevaert; Michel De Pauw; Steven Haine
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.