Literature DB >> 34908897

Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 38 pesticides with various modes of action.

Takashi Nagai1.   

Abstract

Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) of 38 pesticides with various modes of action were analyzed as a higher-tier ecological effect assessment based on collected acute toxicity data. Then the 5% hazardous concentrations (HC5) based on each SSD were calculated as the predicted no-effect concentrations for aquatic ecosystems. The differences between HC5 and registration criteria were small (within ten-fold) for 35 of the 38 pesticides. However, there were more than ten-fold differences for a fungicide and two herbicides. These results suggest that the current effect assessment scheme could underestimate the effect of such pesticides. This could be caused by differences in sensitivity of specific properties of the mode of action. © Pesticide Science Society of Japan 2021. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  SSD; aquatic organisms; hazardous concentration; registration criteria

Year:  2021        PMID: 34908897      PMCID: PMC8640677          DOI: 10.1584/jpestics.D21-034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pestic Sci        ISSN: 1348-589X            Impact factor:   1.519


  11 in total

Review 1.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; J S Jaworska
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Refined aquatic risk assessment for aldicarb in the United States.

Authors:  Dwayne R J Moore; Ryan P Thompson; Sara I Rodney; David Fischer; Tharacad Ramanarayanan; Tilghman Hall
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Lorraine Maltby; Naomi Blake; Theo C M Brock; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime.

Authors:  Lorraine Maltby; Theo C M Brock; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Acute tier-1 and tier-2 effect assessment approaches in the EFSA Aquatic Guidance Document: are they sufficiently protective for insecticides?

Authors:  René P A van Wijngaarden; Lorraine Maltby; Theo C M Brock
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.845

6.  Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 68 pesticides used in Japanese paddy fields.

Authors:  Takashi Nagai
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 1.519

7.  Screening-level risk assessment of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate for aquatic organisms using monitoring data in Japan.

Authors:  Wataru Naito; Yoshihiro Gamo; Kikuo Yoshida
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Ecological risks of diazinon from agricultural use in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins, California.

Authors:  J M Giddings; L W Hall; K R Solomon
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.