Literature DB >> 34908478

Deep-learning reconstruction for ultra-low-dose lung CT: Volumetric measurement accuracy and reproducibility of artificial ground-glass nodules in a phantom study.

Ryoji Mikayama1, Takashi Shirasaka1, Tsukasa Kojima1,2, Yuki Sakai1, Hidetake Yabuuchi3, Masatoshi Kondo1, Toyoyuki Kato1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The lung nodule volume determined by CT is used for nodule diagnoses and monitoring tumor responses to therapy. Increased image noise on low-dose CT degrades the measurement accuracy of the lung nodule volume. We compared the volumetric accuracy among deep-learning reconstruction (DLR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) at an ultra-low-dose setting.
METHODS: Artificial ground-glass nodules (6 mm and 10 mm diameters, -660 HU) placed at the lung-apex and the middle-lung field in chest phantom were scanned by 320-row CT with the ultra-low-dose setting of 6.3 mAs. Each scan data set was reconstructed by DLR, MBIR, and HIR. The volumes of nodules were measured semi-automatically, and the absolute percent volumetric error (APEvol) was calculated. The APEvol provided by each reconstruction were compared by the Tukey-Kramer method. Inter- and intraobserver variabilities were evaluated by a Bland-Altman analysis with limits of agreements.
RESULTS: DLR provided a lower APEvol compared to MBIR and HIR. The APEvol of DLR (1.36%) was significantly lower than those of the HIR (8.01%, p = 0.0022) and MBIR (7.30%, p = 0.0053) on a 10-mm-diameter middle-lung nodule. DLR showed narrower limits of agreement compared to MBIR and HIR in the inter- and intraobserver agreement of the volumetric measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: DLR showed higher accuracy compared to MBIR and HIR for the volumetric measurement of artificial ground-glass nodules by ultra-low-dose CT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DLR with ultra-low-dose setting allows a reduction of dose exposure, maintaining accuracy for the volumetry of lung nodule, especially in patients which deserve a long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34908478      PMCID: PMC8822562          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  28 in total

1.  Objective assessment of low contrast detectability in computed tomography with Channelized Hotelling Observer.

Authors:  Damien Racine; Alexandre H Ba; Julien G Ott; François O Bochud; Francis R Verdun
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  In vivo repeatability of automated volume calculations of small pulmonary nodules with CT.

Authors:  Cristiano Rampinelli; Elvio De Fiori; Sara Raimondi; Giulia Veronesi; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The development and use of a chest phantom for optimizing scanning techniques on a variety of low-dose helical computed tomography devices.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Muramatsu; Yukihiro Tsuda; Yoshimasa Nakamura; Mitsuru Kubo; Toshiyuki Takayama; Kouzou Hanai
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT.

Authors:  Motonori Akagi; Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Keigo Narita; Yukiko Honda; Jian Zhou; Zhou Yu; Naruomi Akino; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: A phantom study.

Authors:  Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park; Yong Sub Song; Sang Min Lee; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Comparative evaluation of newly developed model-based and commercially available hybrid-type iterative reconstruction methods and filter back projection method in terms of accuracy of computer-aided volumetry (CADv) for low-dose CT protocols in phantom study.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Ohno; Atsushi Yaguchi; Tomoya Okazaki; Kota Aoyagi; Hitoshi Yamagata; Naoki Sugihara; Hisanobu Koyama; Takeshi Yoshikawa; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction.

Authors:  Eunhee Kang; Junhong Min; Jong Chul Ye
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Effect of nodule characteristics on variability of semiautomated volume measurements in pulmonary nodules detected in a lung cancer screening program.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Rob J van Klaveren; Hester J van der Zaag-Loonen; Geertruida H de Bock; Hester A Gietema; Dong Ming Xu; Anne L M Leusveld; Harry J de Koning; Ernst T Scholten; Johny Verschakelen; Mathias Prokop; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.