| Literature DB >> 34908212 |
Abdullah Ishaque1,2, Daniel Ta1,2, Muhammad Khan2, Lorne Zinman3, Lawrence Korngut4, Angela Genge5, Annie Dionne6, Hannah Briemberg7, Collin Luk8, Yee-Hong Yang9, Christian Beaulieu10, Derek Emery11, Dean T Eurich12, Richard Frayne13,14, Simon Graham15, Alan Wilman10, Nicolas Dupré16,17, Sanjay Kalra1,2,8.
Abstract
Progressive cerebral degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains poorly understood. Here, three-dimensional (3D) texture analysis was used to study longitudinal gray and white matter cerebral degeneration in ALS from routine T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Participants were included from the Canadian ALS Neuroimaging Consortium (CALSNIC) who underwent up to three clinical assessments and MRI at four-month intervals, up to 8 months after baseline (T0 ). Three-dimensional maps of the texture feature autocorrelation were computed from T1-weighted images. One hundred and nineteen controls and 137 ALS patients were included, with 81 controls and 84 ALS patients returning for at least one follow-up. At baseline, texture changes in ALS patients were detected in the motor cortex, corticospinal tract, insular cortex, and bilateral frontal and temporal white matter compared to controls. Longitudinal comparison of texture maps between T0 and Tmax (last follow-up visit) within ALS patients showed progressive texture alterations in the temporal white matter, insula, and internal capsule. Additionally, when compared to controls, ALS patients had greater texture changes in the frontal and temporal structures at Tmax than at T0 . In subgroup analysis, slow progressing ALS patients had greater progressive texture change in the internal capsule than the fast progressing patients. Contrastingly, fast progressing patients had greater progressive texture changes in the precentral gyrus. These findings suggest that the characteristic longitudinal gray matter pathology in ALS is the progressive involvement of frontotemporal regions rather than a worsening pathology within the motor cortex, and that phenotypic variability is associated with distinct progressive spatial pathology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34908212 PMCID: PMC8886653 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038
Baseline characteristics of study participants
|
| Controls | ALS |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 119 | 137 | ||
| Age (years) | 55.8 ± 10.4 | 59.1 ± 10.5 | .01 |
| Gender, male/female | 58/61 | 85/52 | .03 |
| Site of symptom onset, limb/bulbar | — | 110/27 | |
| ALSFRS‐R | — | 39 (20–47) | |
| Symptom duration (months) | — | 23.4 (5.7–151.7) | |
| Disease progression rate | — | 0.4 (0.02–2.1) | |
| UMN burden score | — | 5 (1–12) | |
| Average finger tapping score | 59.0 ± 12.2 | 43.3 ± 13.2 | <.001 |
| Average foot tapping score | 43.4 ± 8.5 | 29.0 ± 12.2 | <.001 |
Note: Data are represented as mean ± SD, or median (range) if data did not follow a normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test, p < .05). Significant between‐group differences: p < .05.
Abbreviations: ALSFRS‐R, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale‐revised; disease progression rate = (48 − ALSFRS‐R)/symptom duration; UMN, upper motor neuron.
Independent samples t‐test.
Chi‐squared test.
FIGURE 1Texture differences between ALS patients and controls at T 0. Regions in red indicate areas of significantly (p < .0005, cluster size >50) decreased autocorrelation in ALS patients and regions in blue indicate areas of significantly increased autocorrelation. The color bar on the bottom right shows the range of T‐values for the contrast controls >ALS patients
FIGURE 2Texture differences between ALS subgroups of slow and fast progressing patients compared to controls at T 0. In panel (a), regions in red indicate areas of significantly (p < .0005, cluster size >50) altered autocorrelation in slow progressing ALS patients compared to controls. In panel (b), regions in red indicate areas of significantly altered autocorrelation in fast progressing ALS patients compared to controls. The color bars show the range of F‐values
FIGURE 3Longitudinal changes in texture in (a) ALS patients and (b) slow and (c) fast progressing subgroups from T 0 to T max evaluated using paired t‐tests (p < .0005, cluster size >50). (a) In all ALS patients, autocorrelation decreased longitudinally (red) in the posterior corpus callosum, left insular cortex, and at the junction of lateral ventricles and bilateral caudate heads. Autocorrelation increased (blue) in the left internal capsule and right thalamus (p < .0005, cluster size >50). (b) In slow progressing ALS, autocorrelation decreased in the posterior corpus callosum and increased in the left internal capsule. (c) In fast progressing ALS, autocorrelation decreased in the posterior corpus callosum and left insular cortex. Autocorrelation was not increased in this subgroup. The color bars show the range of T‐values
FIGURE 4Texture differences between ALS compared to controls at T 0 (a) and T max (b). In panels (a) and (b), regions in red indicate areas of significantly (p < .0005, cluster size >50) altered autocorrelation in ALS patients compared to controls. The color bars show the range of F‐values. Images on the right show a merged glass‐brain representation of the differences in ALS patients at T 0 and T max. Regions in blue indicate significant clusters present only at T 0, regions in purple indicate significant overlapping clusters present at T 0 and T max, and regions in red indicate significant clusters present only at T max
FIGURE 5Texture differences in controls, ALS, and ALS subgroups between various timepoints in (a) the PLIC and (b) the precentral gyrus regions of interests. Data are represented as the mean ± 95% CI at each point. The numbers inside in the bars in (a) represent the sample sizes of each group in the respective analyses
FIGURE 6Cerebral associations between texture and clinical measures in ALS patients. Regions in yellow indicate areas of significant (p < .0005, cluster size >50) positive correlations between autocorrelation and (a) ALSFRS‐R, (b) UMN burden score, (c) average finger tapping score, and (d) average foot tapping score. The color bars show the range of T‐values. ALSFRS‐R, ALS functional rate scale‐revised; UMN, upper motor neuron