Literature DB >> 21731059

Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research.

Flavia M Facio1, Stephanie Brooks, Johanna Loewenstein, Susannah Green, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker.   

Abstract

The promise of personalized medicine depends on the ability to integrate genetic sequencing information into disease risk assessment for individuals. As genomic sequencing technology enters the realm of clinical care, its scale necessitates answers to key social and behavioral research questions about the complexities of understanding, communicating, and ultimately using sequence information to improve health. Our study captured the motivations and expectations of research participants who consented to participate in a research protocol, ClinSeq, which offers to return a subset of the data generated through high-throughput sequencing. We present findings from an exploratory study of 322 participants, most of whom identified themselves as white, non-Hispanic, and coming from higher socio-economic groups. Participants aged 45-65 years answered open-ended questions about the reasons they consented to ClinSeq and about what they anticipated would come of genomic sequencing. Two main reasons for participating were as follows: a conviction to altruism in promoting research, and a desire to learn more about genetic factors that contribute to one's own health risk. Overall, participants expected genomic research to help improve understanding of disease causes and treatments. Our findings offer a first glimpse into the motivations and expectations of individuals seeking their own genomic information, and provide initial insights into the value these early adopters of technology place on information generated by high-throughput sequencing studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21731059      PMCID: PMC3230362          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  29 in total

1.  Motivations and psychosocial impact of genetic testing for HNPCC.

Authors:  M J Esplen; L Madlensky; K Butler; W McKinnon; B Bapat; J Wong; M Aronson; S Gallinger
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-09-15

2.  The detection and estimation of linkage between the genes for elliptocytosis and the Rh blood type.

Authors:  N E MORTON
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1956-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Comparison of motivations and concerns for genetic testing in hereditary colorectal and breast cancer syndromes.

Authors:  J Balmaña; E M Stoffel; K M Emmons; J E Garber; S Syngal
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Motives and perception of healthy volunteers who participate in experiments.

Authors:  C E van Gelderen; T J Savelkoul; W van Dokkum; J Meulenbelt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Factors that influence a patient's decision to participate in a phase I cancer clinical trial.

Authors:  K M Schutta; C B Burnett
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Genetic counselling and testing in cardiomyopathies: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

Authors:  Philippe Charron; Michael Arad; Eloisa Arbustini; Cristina Basso; Zofia Bilinska; Perry Elliott; Tiina Helio; Andre Keren; William J McKenna; Lorenzo Monserrat; Sabine Pankuweit; Andreas Perrot; Claudio Rapezzi; Arsen Ristic; Hubert Seggewiss; Irene van Langen; Luigi Tavazzi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Janet Weiner; Barbara Weber; David A Asch
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves.

Authors:  P Hobbs; A Smith; W D George; R A Sellwood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Reasons for seeking genetic susceptibility testing among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Susan A LaRusse; Heather Katzen; Peter J Whitehouse; Melissa Barber; Stephen G Post; Norman Relkin; Kimberly Quaid; Robert H Pietrzak; L Adrienne Cupples; Lindsay A Farrer; Tamsen Brown; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.703

10.  What motivates interest in attending a familial cancer genetics clinic?

Authors:  L Fraser; S Bramald; C Chapman; C Chu; V Cornelius; F Douglas; A Lucassen; A Nehammer; S Sutton; M Trivella; S Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.446

View more
  76 in total

1.  Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rebecca Branum; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Dispositional optimism and perceived risk interact to predict intentions to learn genome sequencing results.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Associations of spontaneous self-affirmation with health care experiences and health information seeking in a national survey of US adults.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Jennifer L Howell; Amber S Emanuel; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Peter R Harris
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2015-09-28

Review 4.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A genetic counselor's guide to using next-generation sequencing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; Kristy Lee; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Perceived ambiguity as a barrier to intentions to learn genome sequencing results.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Paul K J Han; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-05-24

Review 7.  Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jennefer N Kohler; Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Perceptions of African-American health professionals and community members on the participation of children and pregnant women in genetic research.

Authors:  E M Ngui; T D Warner; L W Roberts
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Christine Rini; Barbara A Bernhardt; J Scott Roberts; Kurt D Christensen; James P Evans; Kyle B Brothers; Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The role of current affect, anticipated affect and spontaneous self-affirmation in decisions to receive self-threatening genetic risk information.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Peter R Harris; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.