| Literature DB >> 34905639 |
Elisabeth Lettau1,2, Domenic Zill1,2, Marta Späth1, Christian Lorent1, Praveen K Singh2, Lars Lauterbach1,2.
Abstract
The soluble methane monooxygenase receives electrons from NADH via its reductase MmoC for oxidation of methane, which is itself an attractive C1 building block for a future bioeconomy. Herein, we present biochemical and spectroscopic insights into the reductase from the marine methanotroph Methylomonas methanica MC09. The presence of a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and [2Fe2S] cluster as its prosthetic group were revealed by reconstitution experiments, iron determination and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. As a true halotolerant enzyme, MmoC still showed 50 % of its specific activity at 2 M NaCl. We show that MmoC produces only trace amounts of superoxide, but mainly hydrogen peroxide during uncoupled turnover reactions. The characterization of a highly active reductase is an important step for future biotechnological applications of a halotolerant sMMO.Entities:
Keywords: NADH reductase; biocatalysis; enzyme kinetics; methane; soluble methane monooxygenases
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34905639 PMCID: PMC9305295 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202100592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chembiochem ISSN: 1439-4227 Impact factor: 3.461
Figure 1NADH dependent electron transfer by the reductase MmoC to the hydroxylase component of the soluble methane monooxygenase. The NADH dependent reductase MmoC from M. methanica MC09 (homology model based on PDB: 1KRH.1) and the monomeric MMOH‐MmoB complex from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) (crystal structure, PDB: 4GAM) are shown. The co‐substrate O2, protons and formation of water are excluded from the reaction equation on the right side. The [2Fe2S] cluster coordinating predicted cysteines are indicated.
Figure 2Halotolerance and FMN/FAD reconstitution experiments of soluble methane monooxygenase reductase from Methylomonas methanica MC09. A: Evaluation of salt tolerance for NADH‐mediated reduction of benzyl viologen by MmoC at non‐optima conditions (23 °C and pH 7.0). B: NADH specificity (clamp below) and FAD/FMN reconstitution experiments (clamp centre/top) at optima reaction conditions (0.25 M NaCl, pH 7.2 and 36 °C) The means of three technical replicates and standard deviations are shown. The asterisk indicates significance between NADH without and with 25 μM FAD (p value<0.05).
Figure 3UV/vis and EPR spectra of as‐isolated and reduced MmMmoC. A: UV/vis spectrum of the as‐isolated sample at 26 μM. B: Difference spectrum of the as‐isolated‐minus‐dithionite reduced sample; C: X‐band EPR spectra of as‐isolated (top) and NADH reduced (bottom) MmoC at 50 μM.
ROS formation in comparison to NADH:BV activity of MmMmoC.
|
NADH : O2 [min−1][a] |
O2 − production [min−1][b] |
H2O2 production [min−1] |
NADH : BV [min−1][c] |
|---|---|---|---|
|
6.0±2.1 |
0.13±0.04 |
5.3±2.6 |
4585±118 |
[a] NADH oxidation was measured, which is a two‐electron transferring step. [b] Superoxide production from O2 represents an one‐electron transfer step. [c] Benzyl viologen reduction was followed under anaerobic conditions, which represents also an one‐electron transferring step. Thus, for comparison to NADH:O2 specific activity in terms of transferred electrons, the NADH:BV and O2 − production activities have to be dived by factor two.