| Literature DB >> 34894972 |
Nader S Abutaleb1, Ahmed E M Elhassanny1, Alessio Nocentini2, Chad S Hewitt3, Ahmed Elkashif4, Bruce R Cooper5, Claudiu T Supuran2, Mohamed N Seleem1,6, Daniel P Flaherty3,7,8.
Abstract
Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a high-priority pathogen of concern due to the growing prevalence of resistance development against approved antibiotics. Herein, we report the anti-gonococcal activity of ethoxzolamide, the FDA-approved human carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Ethoxzolamide displayed an MIC50, against a panel of N. gonorrhoeae isolates, of 0.125 µg/mL, 16-fold more potent than acetazolamide, although both molecules exhibited almost similar potency against the gonococcal carbonic anhydrase enzyme (NgCA) in vitro. Acetazolamide displayed an inhibition constant (Ki) versus NgCA of 74 nM, while Ethoxzolamide's Ki was estimated to 94 nM. Therefore, the increased anti-gonococcal potency of ethoxzolamide was attributed to its increased permeability in N. gonorrhoeae as compared to that of acetazolamide. Both drugs demonstrated bacteriostatic activity against N. gonorrhoeae, exhibited post-antibiotic effects up to 10 hours, and resistance was not observed against both. Taken together, these results indicate that acetazolamide and ethoxzolamide warrant further investigation for translation into effective anti-N. gonorrhoeae agents.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; antibiotics; drug repurposing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34894972 PMCID: PMC8667909 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2021.1991336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.Structures of FDA-approved human carbonic anhydrase inhibitors acetazolamide and ethoxzolamide.
MICs for AZM and EZM against a panel of N. gonorrhoeae clinical isolates.
| MIC (µg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZMa | EZM | AZI | CEF | |
| CDC 165 | 4 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.06 |
| CDC 166 | 4 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.125 |
| CDC 167 | 2 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.015 |
| CDC 168 | 4 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.125 |
| CDC 169 | 4 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.125 |
| CDC 173 | 1 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.125 |
| CDC 178 | 2 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.03 |
| CDC 179 | 4 | 0.125 | 4 | 0.008 |
| CDC 181 | 2 | 0.25 | >64 | 0.015 |
| CDC 182 | 4 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.03 |
| CDC 183 | 2 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.03 |
| CDC 184 | 2 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.06 |
| CDC 186 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.03 |
| CDC 187 | 2 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.015 |
| CDC 197 | 4 | 0.25 | 2 | 0.015 |
| CDC 202 | 4 | 0.25 | 16 | 0.008 |
| CDC 211 | 1 | 0.25 | 2 | 0.03 |
| ATCC700825 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.008 |
| WHO-V | 0.5 | 0.015 | 16 | 0.008 |
| WHO-W | 2 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.06 |
| WHO-X | 1 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 |
| WHO-Z | 4 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 |
|
| 2 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.03 |
|
| 4 | 0.25 | 16 | 0.125 |
AZM: acetazolamide; EZM: ethoxzolamide; AZI: azithromycin; CEF: ceftriaxone. aPreviously reported by Hewitt et al37. bMIC50: minimum inhibitory concentration at which the drug inhibited 50% of the tested strains. cMIC90: minimum inhibitory concentration at which the drug inhibited 90% of the tested strains.
MICs of molecules under normal and CO2 conditions.
| Test agent | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normalb | CO2c | Normalb | CO2c | Normalb | CO2c | |
| AZM | 4d | >64d | 2d | >64d | 1 | >64 |
| EZM | 0.25 | 64 | 0.125 | >64 | 0.25 | >64 |
| AZI | >64d | >64d | 2d | 2d | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| CEF | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
AZM: acetazolamide; EZM: ethoxzolamide; AZI: azithromycin; CEF: ceftriaxone. aMIC values in µg/mL. bindicates standard conditions in ambient air. cindicates incubation in presence of 5% CO2. ddata reported by Hewitt et al..
Inhibitory constants for AZM and EZM against NgCA and hCAs
| CO2 Hydration | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| NgCA | hCA I | hCA II | |
| AZMa | 74 ± 3b | 250 ± 11b | 13.0 ± 0.8b |
| EZM | 94 ± 7 | 25 ± 4 | 8.0 ± 1.2 |
AZM: acetazolamide; EZM: ethoxzolamide.
aCatalytic CO2 hydration assay Ki determined from the mean of one experiment performed in triplicate and IC50 values entered into Cheng-Prusoff equation. Values reported are ± standard error of the mean.
bPreviously reported by Hewitt et al..
Figure 2.Drug accumulation in N. gonorrhoeae ATCC700825 over 120 min at pH 7.4. (A) Plot of accumulation in nmol/109 CFU over 120 min after treatment with AZM, EZM, and tetracycline. (B) Accumulation of each drug at each time point in ng/109 CFUs. Each drug was dosed at a concentration of 50 µM into 1 ml tubes containing 109 CFU of N. gonorrhoeae.
Figure 3.Time-kill assay of CAIs, azithromycin (AZI), and ceftriaxone (CEF) (n = 4, at 10 × MIC) against N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 700825. DMSO (vehicle) served as a negative control. The error bars represent standard deviation values for each test agent studied. The data were analysed via a two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons. An asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between treatment with drugs compared to DMSO treatment (negative control).
Post-antibiotic effect of molecules against N. gonorrhoeae.
| Post-antibiotic effect (hours) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Strain | AZM | EZM | AZI |
| CDC 181 | 2 | 10 | 8 |
| CDC 186 | 4 | 10 | 8 |
AZM: acetazolamide; EZM: ethoxzolamide; AZI: azithromycin. Drugs tested at 10 MIC.
Spontaneous mutation frequencies of AZM, EZM, and rifampicin against N. gonorrhoeae 202.
| Drugs | 5 × MIC | 10 × MIC |
|---|---|---|
| AZM | <5.42 × 10−9 | <5.42 × 10−9 |
| EZM | <5.42 × 10−9 | <5.42 × 10−9 |
| Rifampicin | 1.49 × 10−7 | 1.14 × 10−7 |
Figure 4.Comparison of E. coli porin OmpF and N. gonorrhoeae porin PorB. (A) Overlay of E. coli porin OmpF (yellow, PDB: 1OPF) and N. gonorrhoeae (cyan, PDB: 4AUI). (B) Side view cross-section of OmpF, porin constriction point depicted by a double-headed arrow with diameter of 11.2 Å. (C) Side view cross-section of PorB, porin constriction point depicted by the double-headed arrow with a diameter of 11.9 Å. (D) Surface electrostatic potential of OmpF, blue = positive charge and red = negative charge, arrow points to anionic surface patch. (E) Surface electrostatic potential of PorB, blue = positive charge and red = negative charge, arrow points to anionic surface patch. Overlays, surface representations, and electrostatic potentials are calculated in PyMol version 2.3.3 (Schrödinger, LLC). This figure was created on BioRender.com.
Figure 5.Physicochemical and eNTRy rules properties for AZM and EZM. Green text indicates favourable properties for E. coli accumulation defined by Richter et al. and calculated by entry-way.org.