Edward J Evans1,2, James DeGregori1,2,3. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. 2. Linda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. 3. University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To shed light on the earliest events in oncogenesis, there is growing interest in understanding the mutational landscapes of normal tissues across ages. In the last decade, next-generation sequencing of human tissues has revealed a surprising abundance of cells with what would be considered oncogenic mutations. AIMS: We performed meta-analysis on previously published sequencing data on normal tissues to categorize mutations based on their presence in cancer and showcase the quantity of cells with cancer-associated mutations in cancer-free individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed sequencing data from these studies of normal tissues to determine the prevalence of cells with mutations in three different categories across multiple age groups: 1) mutations in genes designated as drivers, 2) mutations that are in the Cancer Gene Census (CGC), and 3) mutations in the CGC that are considered pathogenic. As we age, the percentage of cells in all three levels increase significantly, reaching over 50% of cells having oncogenic mutations for multiple tissues in the older age groups. The clear enrichment for these mutations, particularly at older ages, likely indicates strong selection for the resulting phenotypes. Combined with an estimation of the number of cells in tissues, we calculate that most older, cancer-free individuals possess at least a 100 billion cells that harbor at least one oncogenic mutation, presumably emanating from a fitness advantage conferred by these mutations that promotes clonal expansion. CONCLUSIONS: These studies of normal tissues have highlighted the specific drivers of clonal expansion and how frequently they appear in us. Their high prevalence throughout cancer-free individuals necessitates reconsideration of the oncogenicity of these mutations, which could shape methods of detection, prevention and treatment of cancer, as well as of the potential impact of these mutations on tissue function and our health.
BACKGROUND: To shed light on the earliest events in oncogenesis, there is growing interest in understanding the mutational landscapes of normal tissues across ages. In the last decade, next-generation sequencing of human tissues has revealed a surprising abundance of cells with what would be considered oncogenic mutations. AIMS: We performed meta-analysis on previously published sequencing data on normal tissues to categorize mutations based on their presence in cancer and showcase the quantity of cells with cancer-associated mutations in cancer-free individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed sequencing data from these studies of normal tissues to determine the prevalence of cells with mutations in three different categories across multiple age groups: 1) mutations in genes designated as drivers, 2) mutations that are in the Cancer Gene Census (CGC), and 3) mutations in the CGC that are considered pathogenic. As we age, the percentage of cells in all three levels increase significantly, reaching over 50% of cells having oncogenic mutations for multiple tissues in the older age groups. The clear enrichment for these mutations, particularly at older ages, likely indicates strong selection for the resulting phenotypes. Combined with an estimation of the number of cells in tissues, we calculate that most older, cancer-free individuals possess at least a 100 billion cells that harbor at least one oncogenic mutation, presumably emanating from a fitness advantage conferred by these mutations that promotes clonal expansion. CONCLUSIONS: These studies of normal tissues have highlighted the specific drivers of clonal expansion and how frequently they appear in us. Their high prevalence throughout cancer-free individuals necessitates reconsideration of the oncogenicity of these mutations, which could shape methods of detection, prevention and treatment of cancer, as well as of the potential impact of these mutations on tissue function and our health.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer evolution; life history theory; mutational landscape; somatic evolution
Authors: Joohee Lee; James Huprich; Christine Kujath; Karthik Ravi; Felicity Enders; Thomas C Smyrk; David A Katzka; Nicholas J Talley; Jeffrey A Alexander Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Henry Lee-Six; Sigurgeir Olafsson; Peter Ellis; Robert J Osborne; Mathijs A Sanders; Luiza Moore; Nikitas Georgakopoulos; Franco Torrente; Ayesha Noorani; Martin Goddard; Philip Robinson; Tim H H Coorens; Laura O'Neill; Christopher Alder; Jingwei Wang; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Matthias Zilbauer; Nicholas Coleman; Kourosh Saeb-Parsy; Inigo Martincorena; Peter J Campbell; Michael R Stratton Journal: Nature Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Giulio Genovese; Anna K Kähler; Robert E Handsaker; Johan Lindberg; Samuel A Rose; Samuel F Bakhoum; Kimberly Chambert; Eran Mick; Benjamin M Neale; Menachem Fromer; Shaun M Purcell; Oscar Svantesson; Mikael Landén; Martin Höglund; Sören Lehmann; Stacey B Gabriel; Jennifer L Moran; Eric S Lander; Patrick F Sullivan; Pamela Sklar; Henrik Grönberg; Christina M Hultman; Steven A McCarroll Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jian Carrot-Zhang; Giovanny Soca-Chafre; Nick Patterson; Aaron R Thorner; Anwesha Nag; Jacqueline Watson; Giulio Genovese; July Rodriguez; Maya K Gelbard; Luis Corrales-Rodriguez; Yoichiro Mitsuishi; Gavin Ha; Joshua D Campbell; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Oscar Arrieta; Andres F Cardona; Alexander Gusev; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: Iñigo Martincorena; Joanna C Fowler; Agnieszka Wabik; Andrew R J Lawson; Federico Abascal; Michael W J Hall; Alex Cagan; Kasumi Murai; Krishnaa Mahbubani; Michael R Stratton; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Penny A Handford; Peter J Campbell; Kourosh Saeb-Parsy; Philip H Jones Journal: Science Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Dejana Braithwaite; Stephen Anton; Supriya Mohile; James DeGregori; Nancy Gillis; Daohong Zhou; Shirley Bloodworth; Marco Pahor; Jonathan Licht Journal: Aging Cancer Date: 2022-07-12