| Literature DB >> 34885945 |
Xavier Capó1,2, Miquel Martorell3, Josep A Tur1,2,4, Antoni Sureda1,2,4, Antoni Pons1,2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pork lard (PL) is traditionally used as an anti-inflammatory agent. We propose to demonstrate the anti-inflammatory properties of PL, and elucidate which compounds could be responsible for the anti-inflammatory effects.Entities:
Keywords: 5-dodecanolide; inflammation; lipid mediators; pig lard
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885945 PMCID: PMC8658921 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effects of pig lard treatment in foot weight after inflammatory stimulation. Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Effects of pig lard treatment in leg diameter after inflammatory stimulation. Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Effects of pig lard treatment on antioxidant, pro-inflammatory, and oxidative damage markers in inflamed plantar tissues and neutrophils.
| Saline Buffer + Vaseline | Saline Buffer + Pig Lard | Zymosan + Vaseline | Zymosan + Pig Lard | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 2.79 ± 0.30 | 3.02 ± 0.28 | 21.8 ± 2.41 a | 17.8 ± 3.02 a | |
| 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.06 | |
| 11.3 ± 2.81 | 12.9 ± 1.23 | 9.17 ± 1.02 | 10.7 ± 2.23 | |
|
| ||||
| 4.47 ± 0.82 a | 4.74 ± 0.44 a | 7.73 ± 1.03 b | 4.44 ± 0.67 a | |
| 0.80 ± 0.06 | 0.79 ± 0.06 | 0.87 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | |
| 0.15 ± 0.02 a | 0.14 ± 0.01 a | 0.27 ± 0.06 b | 0.16 ± 0.03 a | |
|
| ||||
| 523 ± 79.3 | 542 ± 86.6 | 648 ± 48.4 | 591 ± 79.2 | |
| 15.1 ± 1.13 | 16.7 ± 1.73 | 23.9 ± 0.92 a | 24.2 ± 1.13 a | |
| 5.81 ± 1.06 | 6.04 ± 0.54 | 14.1 ± 1.02 a | 11.6 ± 0.75 b | |
Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Pig lard hydro alcoholic extract composition.
| Molecule | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Hexadecanoic | 0.603 ± 0.09 |
| 9-Octadecenoic | 61.6 ± 2.21 |
| 6-Octadecenoic | 13.3 ± 0.83 |
| 9,12-Octadecenoic | 0.31 ± 0.17 |
| 5,8,11,14-Eicosatetraenoic | 5.77 ± 0.42 |
| 5-Dodecanolide | 4.49 ± 0.15 |
| 7-hexadecenoic | 2.08 ± 0.72 |
| 11,14-Octadecadienoic | 5.84 ± 0.15 |
| Hexadecanamide | 1.07 ± 0.21 |
| Octadecenemide | 5.02 ± 0.52 |
| Resolvin D1 | 2.86 ± 0.28 |
Results are % on molar basis. Resolvin D1 is expressed as μg/g of extract.
Figure 3Cytokines and prostaglandin production rate by PBMCs stimulated with LPS in presence or absence of pig lard hydroalcoholic extract. TNFα production (A); IL6 production (B); IL8 production (C); PGE2 production (D). Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA test. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of pork lard hydroalcoholic extract compounds neutrophils LPS-stimulated. CAT (A); MPO (B). Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA test. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatmnets (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Effects of 0, 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/mL of 5-dodecanolide in cell viability. Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA test. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Effects of 5-dodecanolide in neutrophil TNFα production. Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA test. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).