| Literature DB >> 25960826 |
Xavier Capó1, Miquel Martorell2, Antoni Sureda1, Josep Antoni Tur1, Antoni Pons1.
Abstract
We studied the effects of diet supplementation with docosahexaenoic (DHA) and in vitro vitamin C (VitC) at physiological concentrations on oxidative and inflammatory neutrophil response to phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). Fifteen male footballers ingested a beverage enriched with DHA or a placebo for 8 weeks in a randomized double-blind study. Neutrophils were isolated from blood samples collected in basal conditions at the end of nutritional intervention. Neutrophils were cultured for 2 hours at 37°C in (a) control media, (b) media with PMA, and (c) media with PMA + VitC. PMA induces neutrophil degranulation with increased extracellular myeloperoxidase and catalase activities, nitric oxide production, expression of the inflammatory genes cyclooxygenase-2, nuclear factor κβ, interleukin 8 and tumor necrosis factor α, and interleukin 6 production. DHA diet supplementation boosts the exit of CAT from neutrophils but moderates the degranulation of myeloperoxidase granules induced by PMA. VitC facilitates azurophilic degranulation of neutrophils and increases gene expression of myeloperoxidase induced by PMA. VitC and DHA diet supplementation prevent PMA effects on inflammatory gene expression, although together they do not produce additional effects. DHA diet supplementation enhances antioxidant defences and anti-inflammatory neutrophil response to in vitro PMA activation. VitC facilitates neutrophil degranulation but prevents an inflammatory response to PMA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25960826 PMCID: PMC4417594 DOI: 10.1155/2015/187849
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Anthropometric and physical activity characteristics of subjects.
| Placebo | Experimental | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 19.3 ± 0.4 | 20.4 ± 0.5 |
| Weight (kg) | 76.5 ± 1.8 | 76.4 ± 3.5 |
| Height (cm) | 179 ± 2 | 180 ± 3 |
| Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) | 24.0 ± 0.6 | 23.5 ± 0.5 |
| Waist-hip ratio (WHR) | 0.805 ± 0.012 | 0.814 ± 0.012 |
| Fat mass (Yuhasz, %) | 7.53 ± 0.24 | 7.21 ± 0.25 |
| Fat-free mass (%) | 92.5 ± 0.2 | 92.8 ± 0.3 |
| Intense physical activity time (min/day) | 96.4 ± 57.9 | 50.4 ± 13.1 |
| Moderate physical activity time (min/day) | 68.6 ± 17.1 | 63.2 ± 14.6 |
| VO2max | 60.4 ± 18 | 62.0 ± 0.9 |
| Neutrophils (106 cells/mL blood) | 3.47 ± 0.53 | 2.80 ± 0.12 |
Statistical analysis: Student's t-test for unpaired data, p < 0.05.
Primer sequences and conditions.
| Gene | Primer | Conditions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18S | Fw: 5′-ATG TGA AGT CAC TGT GCC AG-3′ | 95°C | 10 s |
| Rv: 5′-GTG TAA TCC GTC TCC ACA GA-3′ | 60°C | 10 s | |
| 72°C | 12 s | ||
|
| |||
| NF | Fw: 5′-AAACACTGTGAGGATGGGATCTG-3′ | 95°C | 10 s |
| Rv: 5′-CGAAGCCGACCACCATGT-3′ | 60°C | 10 s | |
| 72°C | 15 s | ||
|
| |||
| TNF | Fw: 5′-CCCAGGCAGTCAGATCATCTTCTCGGAA-3′ | 95°C | 10 s |
| Rv: 5′-CTGGTTATCTCTCAGCTCCACGCCATT-3′ | 63°C | 10 s | |
| 72°C | 15 s | ||
|
| |||
| IL8 | Fw: 5′-GCTCTGTGTGAAGGTGCAGTTTTGCCAA-3′ | 94°C | 10 s |
| Rv: 5′-GGCGCAGTGTGGTCCACTCTCAAT-3′ | 63°C | 10 s | |
| 72°C | 15 s | ||
|
| |||
| MPO | Fw: 5′-TGAACATGGGGAGTGTTTCA-3′ | 95°C | 5 s |
| Rv: 5′-CCAGCTCTGCTAACCAGGAC-3′ | 60°C | 7 s | |
| 72°C | 10 s | ||
|
| |||
| COX2 | Fw: 5′-TTGCCTGGCAGGGTTGCTGGTGGTA-3′ | 95°C | 10 s |
| Rv: 5′-CATCTGCCTGCTCTGGTCAATGGAA-3′ | 63°C | 10 s | |
| 72°C | 15 s | ||
Figure 1Effects of in vitro PMA activation, vitamin C, and DHA diet supplementation on total CAT and MPO enzyme activities and on their distribution in the extracellular compartment of neutrophils. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05. S: significant effect of DHA dietary supplementation; A: significant effect of PMA activation; S × A: significant interaction between DHA dietary supplementation and PMA activation effects. ∗ indicates differences between placebo and experimental groups; # indicates difference with respect to the control group; $ indicates differences between PMA and PMA + VitC group. When interaction S × A exists between supplementation and activation factors, different lowercase letters reveal significant differences. Results are the mean ± SEM.
Effects of PMA activation, in vitro vitamin C, and DHA diet supplementation on the distribution of catalase (CAT) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activities between intracellular and extracellular neutrophil compartments.
| Control | PMA | PMA + VitC | S | A | S × A | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extracellular activity | |||||||
| CAT (K/109 cells) | Placebo | 16.2 ± 1.9 | 39.4 ± 8.1# | 46.1 ± 7.3# | X | X | |
| Experimental | 10.3 ± 3.2 | 112 ± 31#∗ | 90.6 ± 17.8# | ||||
| MPO (nkat/109 cells) | Placebo | 9.18 ± 0.86 | 34.3 ± 3.8# | 135 ± 25#$ | X | ||
| Experimental | 6.94 ± 1.07 | 40.3 ± 4.3# | 84.5 ± 33.6#$ | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Intracellular activity | |||||||
| CAT (K/109 cells) | Placebo | 62.1 ± 12.9 | 28.2 ± 6.0# | 77.2 ± 7.29$ | X | ||
| Experimental | 67.2 ± 6.26 | 21.6 ± 3.0# | 68.8 ± 11.9$ | ||||
| MPO (nkat/109 cells) | Placebo | 31.5 ± 11.8a | 38.1 ± 8.93a | 1.19 ± 0.06c | X | X | |
| Experimental | 16.9 ± 2.4ac | 83.6 ± 18.5b | 1.23 ± 0.06c | ||||
Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05. S: supplementation effect; A: activation effect; S × A: interaction between supplementation and activation effects. X indicates significant effect of the statistical factor S, A, or S × A. ∗Differences between placebo and experimental groups; #difference with respect to the control group; $differences between PMA and PMA + VitC group. When interaction S × A exists between supplementation and activation factors, different letters reveal significant differences. Results are the mean ± SEM.
Figure 2Effects of PMA activation, in vitro vitamin C, and DHA diet supplementation on the percentage of extracellular NO and the total NO production. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05. S: DHA diet supplementation effect; A: PMA activation effect; S × A: interaction between supplementation and activation effects. # indicates difference with respect to the control group; $ indicates differences between PMA and PMA + VitC group. When interaction S × A exists between supplementation and activation factors, different lowercase letters reveal significant differences. Results are the mean ± SEM.
Effects of PMA activation, in vitro vitamin C, and DHA diet supplementation on nitrite and nitrate distribution between extracellular and intracellular neutrophil compartments.
| Control | PMA | PMA + VitC | ANOVA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | A | S × A | |||||
| Extracellular | |||||||
| Nitrate (mM) | Placebo | 1.07 ± 0.05 | 1.23 ± 0.04# | 1.03 ± 0.07#$ | X | X | |
| Experimental | 1.16 ± 0.10 | 1.41 ± 0.06∗# | 1.10 ± 0.07#$ | ||||
| Nitrite (nM) | Placebo | 458 ± 54 | 648 ± 48# | 422 ± 68#$ | X | X | |
| Experimental | 545 ± 104 | 798 ± 65∗# | 495 ± 69#$ | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Intracellular | |||||||
| Nitrate (mM) | Placebo | 572 ± 60 | 447 ± 45 | 441 ± 65 | X | ||
| Experimental | 715 ± 119 | 494 ± 78# | 437 ± 60# | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Intracellular/extracellular relationships | |||||||
| Nitrate ratio | Placebo | 1366 ± 213 | 712 ± 77# | 1305 ± 284$ | X | ||
| Experimental | 1363 ± 130 | 646 ± 87# | 954 ± 152# | ||||
Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05. S: supplementation effect; A: activation effect; S × A: interaction between supplementation and activation effects. X indicates significant effect of the statistical factor S, A, or S × A. ∗Differences between placebo and experimental groups; #difference with respect to the control group; $differences between PMA and PMA + VitC group. When interaction S × A exists between supplementation and activation factors, different letters reveal significant differences. Results are the mean ± SEM.
Effects of PMA activation, in vitro vitamin C, and DHA diet supplementation on inflammatory gene expression.
| Control | PMA | PMA + VitC | ANOVA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | A | S × A | |||||
| Gene expression | |||||||
| COX2 | Placebo | 1.00 ± 0.12 | 4.37 ± 1.65# | 1.21 ± 0.31$ | X | ||
| Experimental | 1.14 ± 0.25 | 2.32 ± 0.81 | 1.54 ± 0.33 | ||||
| NF | Placebo | 1.0 ± 0.14a | 1.91 ± 0.34b | 0.88 ± 0.09a | X | X | X |
| Experimental | 0.90 ± 0.08a | 0.98 ± 0.14a | 0.84 ± 0.06a | ||||
| IL8 | Placebo | 1.00 ± 0.15 | 3.19 ± 1.19b | 1.01 ± 0.36a | X | ||
| Experimental | 0.89 ± 0.13a | 0.89 ± 0.12a | 1.09 ± 0.18a | ||||
| TNF | Placebo | 1.00 ± 0.12 | 2.30 ± 0.51# | 0.99 ± 0.14 | X | ||
| Experimental | 1.03 ± 0.15 | 1.24 ± 0.26 | 0.97 ± 0.12$ | ||||
| MPO | Placebo | 1.00 ± 0.16 | 1.32 ± 0.27 | 1.73 ± 0.59 | X | X | |
| Experimental | 2.09 ± 0.61 | 1.86 ± 0.66 | 4.72 ± 1.23#$ | ||||
Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05. S: supplementation effect; A: activation effect; S × A: interaction between supplementation and activation effects. X indicates significant effect of the statistical factor S, A, or S × A. #Difference with respect to the control group; $differences between PMA and PMA + VitC group. When interaction S × A exists between supplementation and activation factors, different letters reveal significant differences. Results are the mean ± SEM.
Figure 3Effects of PMA activation, in vitro vitamin C, and DHA diet supplementation on IL6 and TNFα production rate. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05. S: DHA diet supplementation effect; A: PMA activation effect; S × A: interaction between supplementation and activation effects. When interaction S × A exists between supplementation and activation factors, different lowercase letters reveal significant differences. Results are the mean ± SEM.