| Literature DB >> 34885732 |
Junhao Cheng1, Marhaba Ahmat1, Henan Guo1, Xubiao Wei1, Lulu Zhang1, Qiang Cheng1, Jing Zhang1, Junyong Wang1, Dayong Si1, Yueping Zhang1, Rijun Zhang1.
Abstract
CLP is a novel hybrid peptide derived from CM4, LL37 and TP5, with significantly reduced hemolytic activity and increased antibacterial activity than parental antimicrobial peptides. To avoid host toxicity and obtain high-level bio-production of CLP, we established a His-tagged SUMO fusion expression system in Escherichia coli. The fusion protein can be purified using a Nickel column, cleaved by TEV protease, and further purified in flow-through of the Nickel column. As a result, the recombinant CLP with a yield of 27.56 mg/L and a purity of 93.6% was obtained. The purified CLP exhibits potent antimicrobial activity against gram+ and gram- bacteria. Furthermore, the result of propidium iodide staining and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that CLP can induce the membrane permeabilization and cell death of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) K88. The analysis of thermal stability results showed that the antibacterial activity of CLP decreases slightly below 70 °C for 30 min. However, when the temperature was above 70 °C, the antibacterial activity was significantly decreased. In addition, the antibacterial activity of CLP was stable in the pH range from 4.0 to 9.0; however, when pH was below 4.0 and over 9.0, the activity of CLP decreased significantly. In the presence of various proteases, such as pepsin, papain, trypsin and proteinase K, the antibacterial activity of CLP remained above 46.2%. In summary, this study not only provides an effective strategy for high-level production of antimicrobial peptides and evaluates the interference factors that affect the biological activity of hybrid peptide CLP, but also paves the way for further exploration of the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; antibacterial activity; antimicrobial peptide; fusion expression; hybrid peptide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885732 PMCID: PMC8659006 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The expression and purification of CLP. (A) Tris-Tricine-SDS-PAGE detection of cell lysate supernatant after IPTG induction for 1 to 5 h. (B) Tris-Tricine-SDS-PAGE detection of purified SUMO-TEV-CLP and its product cleaved by TEV protease. (C) Tris-Tricine-SDS-PAGE detection of purified CLP.
Figure 2Analysis of purified CLP using electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry.
Figure 3The antimicrobial activity of recombinant CLP against ETEC K88 at 37 °C for 12 h. (A) Inhibition zone of CLP and SUMO-TEV-CLP on ETEC K88. (B) Statistical analysis of the inhibition zone of ETEC K88 by CLP and SUMO-TEV-CLP. CLP represents recombinant CLP; SUMO-TEV-CLP represents the recombinant fusion protein SUMO-TEV-CLP; PBS represents sodium phosphate buffer was the negative control. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test were used for statistical analysis. *** p < 0.01 indicates a significant difference compared with the PBS control. Finally, ns indicates no significant difference.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CM4, LL37, TP5, recombinant CLP and synthesized CLP against reference bacterial strains.
| Indicated Strains | MIC (µg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL37 | CM4 | TP5 | rCLP | sCLP | |
| 32 | 32 | >512 | 2 | 2 | |
| 32 | 256 | >512 | 8 | 8 | |
| ETEC K88 | 16 | 8 | >512 | 2 | 2 |
MICs, minimal inhibitory concentrations; rCLP, recombinant CLP; sCLP, synthesized CLP; P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; ETEC K88, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88.
Figure 4The uptake of propidium iodide (PI) by ETEC K88 under the treatment of purified CLP. The reference fluorescence (100%) was samples treated with 0.05% SDS, and PBS treatment was as a negative control. 0.5 × MIC, 1 × MIC and 2 × MIC of purified CLP against ETEC K88 were at concentrations of 1, 2 and 4 µg/mL. Data shown are averages over 3 independent replicates. The standard deviation was shown by the error bars. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was used for statistical analysis. *** p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.01 indicate a significant difference compared with the PBS control at 50 minutes and 100 minutes, respectively.
Figure 5Scanning electron microscope micrographs of ETEC K88 treated by recombinant CLP. (A) No peptide (Control). (B) Treated with 1 × MIC recombinant CLP for 2 h. Scale bar, 1.0 µm.
Figure 6The influence of pH, temperature and protease treatment on the antibacterial activity of recombinant CLP (A–C) and synthesized CLP (D–F). (C) The effects of different protease treatments on the antibacterial activity of recombinant CLP. PBS was employed as a control. ETEC K88 was used as the reference strain. Data shown are averages over 3 independent replicates. The standard deviation was shown by the error bars.
Figure 7Hemolytic effects of purified hybrid peptide CLP against sheep RBCs. Data shown are averages over 3 independent replicates. The standard deviation was shown by the error bars.