| Literature DB >> 34884158 |
Pavel Psota1, Gramoz Çubreli1,2, Jindřich Hála3, David Šimurda3, Petr Šidlof1, Jan Kredba1, Marek Stašík1, Vít Lédl1, Michal Jiránek1, Martin Luxa3, Jan Lepicovsky3.
Abstract
This paper presents a very effective interference technique for the sensing and researching of compressible fluid flow in a wind tunnel facility. The developed technique is very sensitive and accurate, yet easy to use under conditions typical for aerodynamic labs, and will be used for the nonintrusive investigation of flutter in blade cascades. The interferometer employs a high-speed camera, fiber optics, and available "of-the-shelf" optics and optomechanics. The construction of the interferometer together with the fiber optics ensures the high compactness and portability of the system. Moreover, single-shot quantitative data processing based on introducing a spatial carrier frequency and Fourier analysis allows for almost real-time quantitative processing. As a validation case, the interferometric system was successfully applied in the research of supersonic compressible fluid discharge from a narrow channel in a wind tunnel. Density distributions were quantitatively analyzed with the spatial resolution of about 50 μm. The results of the measurement revealed important features of the flow pattern. Moreover, the measurement results were compared with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations with a good agreement.Entities:
Keywords: compressible flow; high-speed; interferometry; supersonic; wind tunnel
Year: 2021 PMID: 34884158 PMCID: PMC8662459 DOI: 10.3390/s21238158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Basic concept of the narrow channel measurement. Dashed rectangle represents the investigated area.
Figure 23D CAD assembly of the narrow channel facility.
Figure 3Scheme of the setup: LAS—laser, FS—fiber splitter, FF—fiber ferrule, L0 + L1 + L2—lens, MA—measured area, P0 + P1—pressure probes, WT—wind tunnel, NBS—beamsplitter, CAM—camera.
Figure 4(a) Intensity image (interferogram) captured during measurements, with the zoomed part showing the interference pattern, (b) its Fourier spectrum, (c) the phase change map with region of interest (ROI) marked by the dashed line, and (d) unwrapped phase change map with ROI.
Regimes and the corresponding pressure and pressure ratio values.
| Regime | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pout (kPa) | 54.923 | 47.140 | 39.236 | 28.114 | 23.871 |
| η [ | 0.560 | 0.481 | 0.400 | 0.287 | 0.243 |
Figure 5(a) Density distributions for different regimes—comparison of measured data (left) and the CFD simulations (right); (b) density values along the profile denoted in (a) for regime #5.
Figure 6Slope maps of measured (top—M) and simulated (bottom—S) density distributions in different flow regimes.
Figure 7The time stability of the flow under different regimes.