| Literature DB >> 34882891 |
Antonio Thomaz de Andrade1, Raimundo Barbosa-Barros1, Kjell Nikus2, Rodrigo D Raimundo3, Luiz C de Abreu3,4, Luciana Sacilotto5, Francisco C C Darriuex5, Frank G Yanowitz6, Pedro Brugada7, Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is somewhat a challenging diagnosis, due to its dynamic pattern. One of the aspects of this disease is a significant conduction disorder located in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), which can be explained as a consequence of low expression of Connexin-43. This decreased conduction speed is responsible for the typical electrocardiographic pattern. Opposite leads located preferably in inferior leads of the electrocardiogram may show a deep and widened S wave associated with ascending ST segment depression. Holter monitoring electrocardiographic (ECG) aspects is still a new frontier of knowledge in BrS, especially in intermittent clinical presentations.Entities:
Keywords: Brugada syndrome; Dromotropic disturbance in the right ventricular outflow tract; Holter monitoring; S wave; ST-segment depression
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34882891 PMCID: PMC8916569 DOI: 10.1111/anec.12917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ISSN: 1082-720X Impact factor: 1.485
FIGURE 1(a) Scheme for positioning the Holter electrodes using four electrodes and three bipolar leads. (b) Diagram for positioning the precordial electrodes of conventional ECG using six unipolar leads
FIGURE 2Holter monitoring and 12‐lead ECG of the five cases. (a, d, g, j, and m) show time points with no ST‐segment depression, while (b, e, h, k, and n) illustrate the observed type of ST‐segment depression. (c, f, i, l, and o) show the corresponding 12‐lead ECGs in V1 and V2
FIGURE 3Traces of all 5 Holter cases and its inverted image, by flipping the trace vertically. (a) C3 of case 1; (b) Inverted C3 image of case 1; (c) C2 of case 2; (d) Inverted C2 image of case 1; (e) C2 of case 3; (f) Inverted image of inverted C2 of case 3; (g) C2 of case 4; (h) Inverted C2 image of case 4; (i) C2 of case 5; (j) Inverted C2 image of case 5
FIGURE 4Outline showing the four vectors of ventricular depolarization: Vector I (left middle‐septal vector), Vector II (low‐septal vector), Vector III (vector resulting from the activation of the free walls of both ventricles), and Vector IV (final ventricular depolarization located in the RVOT area) pointing to the right shoulder near aVR (−150°) and concomitantly moving away from channel 2 (near +60°). Note a deep/broad S wave in the C2/II lead, and an opposite pattern in aVR