Literature DB >> 27012403

A New Electrocardiographic Marker of Sudden Death in Brugada Syndrome: The S-Wave in Lead I.

Leonardo Calò1, Carla Giustetto2, Annamaria Martino3, Luigi Sciarra3, Natascia Cerrato2, Marta Marziali3, Jessica Rauzino4, Giulia Carlino5, Ermenegildo de Ruvo3, Federico Guerra6, Marco Rebecchi3, Chiara Lanzillo3, Matteo Anselmino2, Antonio Castro7, Federico Turreni7, Maria Penco5, Massimo Volpe4, Alessandro Capucci6, Fiorenzo Gaita2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification in asymptomatic patients remains by far the most important yet unresolved clinical problem in the Brugada syndrome (BrS).
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to analyze the usefulness of electrocardiographic parameters as markers of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in BrS.
METHODS: This study analyzed data from 347 consecutive patients (78.4% male; mean age 45 ± 13.1 years) with spontaneous type 1 BrS by ECG parameters but with no history of cardiac arrest (including 91.1% asymptomatic at presentation, 5.2% with a history of atrial fibrillation [AF], and 4% with a history of arrhythmic syncope). Electrocardiographic characteristics at the first clinic visit were analyzed to predict ventricular fibrillation (VF)/SCD during follow-up.
RESULTS: During the follow-up (48 ± 38 months), 276 (79.5%) patients remained asymptomatic, 39 (11.2%) developed syncope, and 32 (9.2%) developed VF/SCD. Patients who developed VF/SCD had a lower prevalence of SCN5A gene mutations (p = 0.009) and a higher prevalence of positive electrophysiological study results (p < 0.0001), a family history of SCD (p = 0.03), and AF (p < 0.0001). The most powerful marker for VF/SCD was a significant S-wave (≥0.1 mV and/or ≥40 ms) in lead I. In the multivariate analysis, the duration of S-wave in lead I ≥40 ms (hazard ratio: 39.1) and AF (hazard ratio: 3.7) were independent predictors of VF/SCD during follow-up. Electroanatomic mapping in 12 patients showed an endocardial activation time significantly longer in patients with an S-wave in lead I, mostly because of a significant delay in the anterolateral right ventricular outflow tract.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a wide and/or large S-wave in lead I was a powerful predictor of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with BrS and no history of cardiac arrest at presentation. However, the prognostic value of a significant S-wave in lead I should be confirmed by larger studies and by an independent confirmation cohort of healthy subjects.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arrhythmia; electrocardiography; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27012403     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  36 in total

Review 1.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 2.  [Brugada syndrome : Risk stratification and prevention of sudden cardiac death].

Authors:  Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-31

Review 3.  [Ventricular arrhythmias in ion channel diseases].

Authors:  Christian Wolpert; Mara Vogel; Christian Nagel; Claudia Herrera-Siklody; Norman Rüb
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2017-05-22

4.  Atrial fibrillation and risk of major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jakrin Kewcharoen; Pattara Rattanawong; Chanavuth Kanitsoraphan; Raktham Mekritthikrai; Narut Prasitlumkum; Prapaipan Putthapiban; Poemlarp Mekraksakit; Robert J Pattison; Wasawat Vutthikraivit
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  Brugada Syndrome:Risk Stratification And Management.

Authors:  Yoshifusa Aizawa
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 6.  Right bundle branch block and conduction disturbances in Brugada syndrome and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Leonardo Calò; Annamaria Martino; Emilia Goanta; Yasuo Okumura; Ermenegildo de Ruvo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Baseline fragmented QRS increases the risk of major arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pattara Rattanawong; Tanawan Riangwiwat; Narut Prasitlumkum; Nath Limpruttidham; Napatt Kanjanahattakij; Pakawat Chongsathidkiet; Wasawat Vutthikraivit; Eugene H Chung
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Brugada Syndrome: Defining the Risk in Asymptomatic Patients.

Authors:  Juan Sieira; Pedro Brugada
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016

Review 9.  Pathogenesis and management of Brugada syndrome.

Authors:  Juan Sieira; Gregory Dendramis; Pedro Brugada
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 10.  Atrial fibrillation is associated with sudden cardiac death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pattara Rattanawong; Sikarin Upala; Tanawan Riangwiwat; Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Anawin Sanguankeo; Wasawat Vutthikraivit; Eugene H Chung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.