| Literature DB >> 34871912 |
Arun Kumar Gupta1, Partha Pratim Sahu2, Poonam Mishra3.
Abstract
In the present study, sonication assisted debittering of pomelo fruit juice was carried out and the effect of sonication along with resin/enzyme on the chemical, phytochemical and volatile composition of juice was also investigated. The optimum conditions for sonication coupled debittering using resin were 50 kHz, 2 min, and 45 ℃ while 50 kHz, 60 min, and 60 ℃ were obtained for enzyme hydrolysis. Sonication treatment not only reduced the debittering time but also enhanced the adsorption and hydrolysis of naringin by 17% and 20% in resin and enzyme respectively. In addition, enzymatic activity was also improved and weakened C-O bonds in naringin. At the same time, sonication significantly affected the bioactive compounds of juice, chemical composition, and volatile compounds of juice. Flavor compounds including octanal, linalool, citral, and ethyl butyrate were enhanced by sonication-assisted enzymatic treated juice.Entities:
Keywords: Debittering; Enzyme; Naringin; Pomelo; Resin adsorption; Ultrasound
Year: 2021 PMID: 34871912 PMCID: PMC8649891 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrason Sonochem ISSN: 1350-4177 Impact factor: 7.491
Fig. 1Impacts of ultrasound debittering on (a) Total phenol content (b) Total flavonoid content (c) Naringin content (d) DPPH* scavenging activity (e) Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity (f) Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity.
Fig. 2Influence of ultrasound debittering on enzymatic activity (a) α-L-rhamnosidase activity (b) β-glucosidase activity.
Fig. 3FTIR spectra (a) Naringin (control and ultrasound treated), (b) Resin treated juice, and (c) Enzyme treated.
Impact of ultrasound debittering on non-volatile composition of juice.
| Non volatiles (g/l) | Fresh juice | Resin | Ultrasound + Resin | Enzyme | Ultrasound + Enzyme |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fructose | 12 ± 0.61a | 9 ± 0.45d | 7 ± 0.35e | 11 ± 0.55bc | 11 ± 0.58b |
| Glucose | 11 ± 0.57a | 9 ± 0.46d | 8 ± 0.40e | 10 ± 0.50c | 11 ± 0.55ab |
| Sucrose | 50 ± 2.53a | 34 ± 1.70c | 27 ± 1.37d | 48 ± 2.43b | 49 ± 2.45ab |
| Citric acid | 12 ± 0.62a | 7 ± 0.38d | 5 ± 0.25e | 10 ± 0.52c | 11 ± 0.55b |
| Malic acid | 1.5 ± 0.07a | 0.75 ± 0.03d | 0.41 ± 0.02e | 1 ± 0.052c | 1 ± 0.07ab |
| Tartaric acid | 0.13 ± 0.01a | 0.07 ± 0.00d | 0.05 ± 0.00e | 0.09 ± 0.00c | 0.11 ± 0.00b |
| Succinic acid | 0.22 ± 0.01b | 0.10 ± 0.01d | 0.08 ± 0.00a | 0.18 ± 0.01c | 0.21 ± 0.01b |
| Ascorbic acid | 0.32 ± 0.01a | 0.21 ± 0.01d | 0.12 ± 0.00e | 0.30 ± 0.01b | 0.28 ± 0.01c |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 15). Values followed by different superscript letter in a row are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Volatile composition of fresh and debittered pomelo juice.
| Volatiles (ppm) | Fresh juice | Resin | Ultrasound + Resin | Enzyme | Ultrasound + Enzyme |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (R)-limonene | 1668 ± 83.44a | 792 ± 39.63c | 662 ± 33.10d | 1052 ± 52.6b | 1031 ± 51.55b |
| Octanal | 13 ± 0.65a | 5 ± 0.26d | 3 ± 0.19e | 9 ± 0.48c | 10 ± 0.50b |
| Linalool | 21 ± 1.05a | 15 ± 0.76d | 12 ± 0.64e | 19 ± 0.95c | 19 ± 0.98b |
| Ethyl Butanoate | 107 ± 5.36a | 84 ± 4.20c | 64 ± 3.23d | 97 ± 4.88b | 95 ± 4.78b |
| Terpineol | 13 ± 0.68a | 8 ± 0.43d | 7 ± 0.37e | 11 ± 0.56b | 10 ± 0.56c |
| Citral | 16 ± 0.81a | 8 ± 0.44c | 6 ± 0.31d | 15 ± 0.76b | 15 ± 0.78b |
| α-pinene | 21 ± 1.06 a | 12 ± 0.62c | 9 ± 0.48d | 19 ± 0.97b | 19 ± 0.97b |
| Ethyl Butyrate | 1020 ± 51.00a | 596 ± 29.81c | 542 ± 27.10 cd | 780 ± 39.33b | 790 ± 39.50b |
| 2-phenylethanol | 1736 ± 86.80a | 1684 ± 84.21b | 1544 ± 77.20c | 1086 ± 54.30d | 1006 ± 50.34de |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 15). Values followed by different superscript letter in a row are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).