Literature DB >> 34870220

Cancer Risk Estimation Combining Lung Screening CT with Clinical Data Elements.

Riqiang Gao1, Yucheng Tang1, Mirza S Khan1, Kaiwen Xu1, Alexis B Paulson1, Shelbi Sullivan1, Yuankai Huo1, Stephen Deppen1, Pierre P Massion1, Kim L Sandler1, Bennett A Landman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a model to estimate lung cancer risk using lung cancer screening CT and clinical data elements (CDEs) without manual reading efforts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two screening cohorts were retrospectively studied: the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; participants enrolled between August 2002 and April 2004) and the Vanderbilt Lung Screening Program (VLSP; participants enrolled between 2015 and 2018). Fivefold cross-validation using the NLST dataset was used for initial development and assessment of the co-learning model using whole CT scans and CDEs. The VLSP dataset was used for external testing of the developed model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and area under the precision-recall curve were used to measure the performance of the model. The developed model was compared with published risk-prediction models that used only CDEs or imaging data alone. The Brock model was also included for comparison by imputing missing values for patients without a dominant pulmonary nodule.
RESULTS: A total of 23 505 patients from the NLST (mean age, 62 years ± 5 [standard deviation]; 13 838 men, 9667 women) and 147 patients from the VLSP (mean age, 65 years ± 5; 82 men, 65 women) were included. Using cross-validation on the NLST dataset, the AUC of the proposed co-learning model (AUC, 0.88) was higher than the published models predicted with CDEs only (AUC, 0.69; P < .05) and with images only (AUC, 0.86; P < .05). Additionally, using the external VLSP test dataset, the co-learning model had a higher performance than each of the published individual models (AUC, 0.91 [co-learning] vs 0.59 [CDE-only] and 0.88 [image-only]; P < .05 for both comparisons).
CONCLUSION: The proposed co-learning predictive model combining chest CT images and CDEs had a higher performance for lung cancer risk prediction than models that contained only CDE or only image data; the proposed model also had a higher performance than the Brock model.Keywords: Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD), CT, Lung, Thorax Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD); Lung; Thorax

Year:  2021        PMID: 34870220      PMCID: PMC8637232          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021210032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  25 in total

1.  Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Lung Nodule Classification.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Mu Zhou; Feng Yang; Caiyun Yang; Jie Tian
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2015

2.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge.

Authors:  Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Alberto Traverso; Thomas de Bel; Moira S N Berens; Cas van den Bogaard; Piergiorgio Cerello; Hao Chen; Qi Dou; Maria Evelina Fantacci; Bram Geurts; Robbert van der Gugten; Pheng Ann Heng; Bart Jansen; Michael M J de Kaste; Valentin Kotov; Jack Yu-Hung Lin; Jeroen T M C Manders; Alexander Sóñora-Mengana; Juan Carlos García-Naranjo; Evgenia Papavasileiou; Mathias Prokop; Marco Saletta; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Ernst T Scholten; Luuk Scholten; Miranda M Snoeren; Ernesto Lopez Torres; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Nicole Walasek; Guido C A Zuidhof; Bram van Ginneken; Colin Jacobs
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc Bidaut; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Binsheng Zhao; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R Van Beeke; David Yankelevitz; Alberto M Biancardi; Peyton H Bland; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Gary E Laderach; Daniel Max; Richard C Pais; David P Y Qing; Rachael Y Roberts; Amanda R Smith; Adam Starkey; Poonam Batrah; Philip Caligiuri; Ali Farooqi; Gregory W Gladish; C Matilda Jude; Reginald F Munden; Iva Petkovska; Leslie E Quint; Lawrence H Schwartz; Baskaran Sundaram; Lori E Dodd; Charles Fenimore; David Gur; Nicholas Petrick; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Brian Hughes; Alessi Vande Casteele; Sangeeta Gupte; Maha Sallamm; Michael D Heath; Michael H Kuhn; Ekta Dharaiya; Richard Burns; David S Fryd; Marcos Salganicoff; Vikram Anand; Uri Shreter; Stephen Vastagh; Barbara Y Croft
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Deep Multi-task Prediction of Lung Cancer and Cancer-free Progression from Censored Heterogenous Clinical Imaging.

Authors:  Riqiang Gao; Lingfeng Li; Yucheng Tang; Sanja L Antic; Alexis B Paulson; Yuankai Huo; Kim L Sandler; Pierre P Massion; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-10

6.  Distanced LSTM: Time-Distanced Gates in Long Short-Term Memory Models for Lung Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Riqiang Gao; Yuankai Huo; Shunxing Bao; Yucheng Tang; Sanja L Antic; Emily S Epstein; Aneri B Balar; Steve Deppen; Alexis B Paulson; Kim L Sandler; Pierre P Massion; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Mach Learn Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-10

7.  Multi-path x-D Recurrent Neural Networks for Collaborative Image Classification.

Authors:  Riqiang Gao; Yuankai Huo; Shunxing Bao; Yucheng Tang; Sanja L Antic; Emily S Epstein; Steve Deppen; Alexis B Paulson; Kim L Sandler; Pierre P Massion; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 5.719

8.  Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening.

Authors:  Martin C Tammemägi; Hormuzd A Katki; William G Hocking; Timothy R Church; Neil Caporaso; Paul A Kvale; Anil K Chaturvedi; Gerard A Silvestri; Tom L Riley; John Commins; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Deffebach; Miranda Pappas; Christina Baumann; Kathryn Artis; Jennifer Priest Mitchell; Bernadette Zakher; Rongwei Fu; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.

Authors:  Martin C Tammemagi; Heidi Schmidt; Simon Martel; Annette McWilliams; John R Goffin; Michael R Johnston; Garth Nicholas; Alain Tremblay; Rick Bhatia; Geoffrey Liu; Kam Soghrati; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; David M Hwang; Francis Laberge; Michel Gingras; Sergio Pasian; Christian Couture; John R Mayo; Paola V Nasute Fauerbach; Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra; Stuart J Peacock; Sonya Cressman; Diana Ionescu; John C English; Richard J Finley; John Yee; Serge Puksa; Lori Stewart; Scott Tsai; Ehsan Haider; Colm Boylan; Jean-Claude Cutz; Daria Manos; Zhaolin Xu; Glenwood D Goss; Jean M Seely; Kayvan Amjadi; Harmanjatinder S Sekhon; Paul Burrowes; Paul MacEachern; Stefan Urbanski; Don D Sin; Wan C Tan; Natasha B Leighl; Frances A Shepherd; William K Evans; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stephen Lam
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.