Literature DB >> 28732268

Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge.

Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio1, Alberto Traverso2, Thomas de Bel3, Moira S N Berens4, Cas van den Bogaard3, Piergiorgio Cerello5, Hao Chen6, Qi Dou6, Maria Evelina Fantacci7, Bram Geurts8, Robbert van der Gugten4, Pheng Ann Heng6, Bart Jansen9, Michael M J de Kaste4, Valentin Kotov3, Jack Yu-Hung Lin10, Jeroen T M C Manders4, Alexander Sóñora-Mengana11, Juan Carlos García-Naranjo12, Evgenia Papavasileiou13, Mathias Prokop14, Marco Saletta5, Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop15, Ernst T Scholten14, Luuk Scholten3, Miranda M Snoeren8, Ernesto Lopez Torres16, Jef Vandemeulebroucke9, Nicole Walasek3, Guido C A Zuidhof4, Bram van Ginneken17, Colin Jacobs14.   

Abstract

Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans has been an active area of research for the last two decades. However, there have only been few studies that provide a comparative performance evaluation of different systems on a common database. We have therefore set up the LUNA16 challenge, an objective evaluation framework for automatic nodule detection algorithms using the largest publicly available reference database of chest CT scans, the LIDC-IDRI data set. In LUNA16, participants develop their algorithm and upload their predictions on 888 CT scans in one of the two tracks: 1) the complete nodule detection track where a complete CAD system should be developed, or 2) the false positive reduction track where a provided set of nodule candidates should be classified. This paper describes the setup of LUNA16 and presents the results of the challenge so far. Moreover, the impact of combining individual systems on the detection performance was also investigated. It was observed that the leading solutions employed convolutional networks and used the provided set of nodule candidates. The combination of these solutions achieved an excellent sensitivity of over 95% at fewer than 1.0 false positives per scan. This highlights the potential of combining algorithms to improve the detection performance. Our observer study with four expert readers has shown that the best system detects nodules that were missed by expert readers who originally annotated the LIDC-IDRI data. We released this set of additional nodules for further development of CAD systems.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Computer-aided detection; Convolutional networks; Deep learning; Medical image challenges; Pulmonary nodules

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28732268     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  94 in total

1.  A collaborative computer aided diagnosis (C-CAD) system with eye-tracking, sparse attentional model, and deep learning.

Authors:  Naji Khosravan; Haydar Celik; Baris Turkbey; Elizabeth C Jones; Bradford Wood; Ulas Bagci
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Discriminative Localization in CNNs for Weakly-Supervised Segmentation of Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Xinyang Feng; Jie Yang; Andrew F Laine; Elsa D Angelini
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2017-09-04

3.  HoTPiG: a novel graph-based 3-D image feature set and its applications to computer-assisted detection of cerebral aneurysms and lung nodules.

Authors:  Shouhei Hanaoka; Yukihiro Nomura; Tomomi Takenaga; Masaki Murata; Takahiro Nakao; Soichiro Miki; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Naoto Hayashi; Osamu Abe; Akinobu Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Automated pulmonary nodule detection in CT images using 3D deep squeeze-and-excitation networks.

Authors:  Li Gong; Shan Jiang; Zhiyong Yang; Guobin Zhang; Lu Wang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Knut Liestøl; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Deep learning aided decision support for pulmonary nodules diagnosing: a review.

Authors:  Yixin Yang; Xiaoyi Feng; Wenhao Chi; Zhengyang Li; Wenzhe Duan; Haiping Liu; Wenhua Liang; Wei Wang; Ping Chen; Jianxing He; Bo Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Evolutionary image simplification for lung nodule classification with convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Daniel Lückehe; Gabriele von Voigt
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 8.  Lung cancer prediction using machine learning and advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Timor Kadir; Fergus Gleeson
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

9.  DeepLesion: automated mining of large-scale lesion annotations and universal lesion detection with deep learning.

Authors:  Ke Yan; Xiaosong Wang; Le Lu; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-07-20

10.  3D deep learning for detecting pulmonary nodules in CT scans.

Authors:  Ross Gruetzemacher; Ashish Gupta; David Paradice
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.