Literature DB >> 34870218

Deep Learning for Lung Cancer Detection on Screening CT Scans: Results of a Large-Scale Public Competition and an Observer Study with 11 Radiologists.

Colin Jacobs1, Arnaud A A Setio1, Ernst T Scholten1, Paul K Gerke1, Haimasree Bhattacharya1, Firdaus A M Hoesein1, Monique Brink1, Erik Ranschaert1, Pim A de Jong1, Mario Silva1, Bram Geurts1, Kaman Chung1, Steven Schalekamp1, Joke Meersschaert1, Anand Devaraj1, Paul F Pinsky1, Stephen C Lam1, Bram van Ginneken1, Keyvan Farahani1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether deep learning algorithms developed in a public competition could identify lung cancer on low-dose CT scans with a performance similar to that of radiologists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a dataset consisting of 300 patient scans was used for model assessment; 150 patient scans were from the competition set and 150 were from an independent dataset. Both test datasets contained 50 cancer-positive scans and 100 cancer-negative scans. The reference standard was set by histopathologic examination for cancer-positive scans and imaging follow-up for at least 2 years for cancer-negative scans. The test datasets were applied to the three top-performing algorithms from the Kaggle Data Science Bowl 2017 public competition: grt123, Julian de Wit and Daniel Hammack (JWDH), and Aidence. Model outputs were compared with an observer study of 11 radiologists that assessed the same test datasets. Each scan was scored on a continuous scale by both the deep learning algorithms and the radiologists. Performance was measured using multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.877 (95% CI: 0.842, 0.910) for grt123, 0.902 (95% CI: 0.871, 0.932) for JWDH, and 0.900 (95% CI: 0.870, 0.928) for Aidence. The average AUC of the radiologists was 0.917 (95% CI: 0.889, 0.945), which was significantly higher than grt123 (P = .02); however, no significant difference was found between the radiologists and JWDH (P = .29) or Aidence (P = .26).
CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithms developed in a public competition for lung cancer detection in low-dose CT scans reached performance close to that of radiologists.Keywords: Lung, CT, Thorax, Screening, Oncology Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Lung; Oncology; Screening; Thorax

Year:  2021        PMID: 34870218      PMCID: PMC8637223          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021210027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  14 in total

1.  Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge.

Authors:  Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Alberto Traverso; Thomas de Bel; Moira S N Berens; Cas van den Bogaard; Piergiorgio Cerello; Hao Chen; Qi Dou; Maria Evelina Fantacci; Bram Geurts; Robbert van der Gugten; Pheng Ann Heng; Bart Jansen; Michael M J de Kaste; Valentin Kotov; Jack Yu-Hung Lin; Jeroen T M C Manders; Alexander Sóñora-Mengana; Juan Carlos García-Naranjo; Evgenia Papavasileiou; Mathias Prokop; Marco Saletta; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Ernst T Scholten; Luuk Scholten; Miranda M Snoeren; Ernesto Lopez Torres; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Nicole Walasek; Guido C A Zuidhof; Bram van Ginneken; Colin Jacobs
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  National lung screening trial: variability in nodule detection rates in chest CT studies.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; David S Gierada; P Hrudaya Nath; Ella Kazerooni; Judith Amorosa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Anne-Marie Baird; Torsten Gerriet Blum; Lorenzo Bonomo; Clementine Bostantzoglou; Otto Burghuber; Blanka Čepická; Alina Comanescu; Sébastien Couraud; Anand Devaraj; Vagn Jespersen; Sergey Morozov; Inbar Nardi Agmon; Nir Peled; Pippa Powell; Helmut Prosch; Sofia Ravara; Janette Rawlinson; Marie-Pierre Revel; Mario Silva; Annemiek Snoeckx; Bram van Ginneken; Jan P van Meerbeeck; Constantine Vardavas; Oyunbileg von Stackelberg; Mina Gaga
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Pim A de Jong; Ernst T Scholten; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Carla Weenink; Uraujh Yousaf-Khan; Nanda Horeweg; Susan van 't Westeinde; Mathias Prokop; Willem P Mali; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Peter M A van Ooijen; Joachim G J V Aerts; Michael A den Bakker; Erik Thunnissen; Johny Verschakelen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Joan E Walter; Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J M Groen; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc Bidaut; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Binsheng Zhao; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R Van Beeke; David Yankelevitz; Alberto M Biancardi; Peyton H Bland; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Gary E Laderach; Daniel Max; Richard C Pais; David P Y Qing; Rachael Y Roberts; Amanda R Smith; Adam Starkey; Poonam Batrah; Philip Caligiuri; Ali Farooqi; Gregory W Gladish; C Matilda Jude; Reginald F Munden; Iva Petkovska; Leslie E Quint; Lawrence H Schwartz; Baskaran Sundaram; Lori E Dodd; Charles Fenimore; David Gur; Nicholas Petrick; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Brian Hughes; Alessi Vande Casteele; Sangeeta Gupte; Maha Sallamm; Michael D Heath; Michael H Kuhn; Ekta Dharaiya; Richard Burns; David S Fryd; Marcos Salganicoff; Vikram Anand; Uri Shreter; Stephen Vastagh; Barbara Y Croft
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Prediction of lung cancer risk at follow-up screening with low-dose CT: a training and validation study of a deep learning method.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Cheng T Lin; Yuliang Li; Martin C Tammemagi; Malcolm V Brock; Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra; Yanxun Xu; Ping Hu; John R Mayo; Heidi Schmidt; Michel Gingras; Sergio Pasian; Lori Stewart; Scott Tsai; Jean M Seely; Daria Manos; Paul Burrowes; Rick Bhatia; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stephen Lam
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2019-10-17

8.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Diego Ardila; Atilla P Kiraly; Sujeeth Bharadwaj; Bokyung Choi; Joshua J Reicher; Lily Peng; Daniel Tse; Mozziyar Etemadi; Wenxing Ye; Greg Corrado; David P Naidich; Shravya Shetty
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management.

Authors:  Sarah J van Riel; Colin Jacobs; Ernst Th Scholten; Rianne Wittenberg; Mathilde M Winkler Wille; Bartjan de Hoop; Ralf Sprengers; Onno M Mets; Bram Geurts; Mathias Prokop; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence: Auto-Discerning the Effectiveness of Lidocaine Concentration Levels in Osteosarcoma Femoral Tumor Segment Resection.

Authors:  Shuqin Ni; Xin Li; Xiuna Yi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 2.  Deep Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gabriele C Forte; Stephan Altmayer; Ricardo F Silva; Mariana T Stefani; Lucas L Libermann; Cesar C Cavion; Ali Youssef; Reza Forghani; Jeremy King; Tan-Lucien Mohamed; Rubens G F Andrade; Bruno Hochhegger
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Diagnostic study on clinical feasibility of an AI-based diagnostic system as a second reader on mobile CT images: a preliminary result.

Authors:  Kaiyue Diao; Yuntian Chen; Ying Liu; Bo-Jiang Chen; Wan-Jiang Li; Lin Zhang; Ya-Li Qu; Tong Zhang; Yun Zhang; Min Wu; Kang Li; Bin Song
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

Review 4.  Innovations in thoracic imaging: CT, radiomics, AI and x-ray velocimetry.

Authors:  Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Andreas Fouras; Colin Jacobs; Nickolas Papanikolaou
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 6.175

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.