Literature DB >> 34870211

Validation of Deep Learning-based Augmentation for Reduced 18F-FDG Dose for PET/MRI in Children and Young Adults with Lymphoma.

Ashok J Theruvath1, Florian Siedek1, Ketan Yerneni1, Anne M Muehe1, Sheri L Spunt1, Allison Pribnow1, Michael Moseley1, Ying Lu1, Qian Zhao1, Praveen Gulaka1, Akshay Chaudhari1, Heike E Daldrup-Link1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate if a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) could enable low-dose fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI for correct treatment response assessment of children and young adults with lymphoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this secondary analysis of prospectively collected data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01542879), 20 patients with lymphoma (mean age, 16.4 years ± 6.4 [standard deviation]) underwent 18F-FDG PET/MRI between July 2015 and August 2019 at baseline and after induction chemotherapy. Full-dose 18F-FDG PET data (3 MBq/kg) were simulated to lower 18F-FDG doses based on the percentage of coincidence events (representing simulated 75%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, and 6.25% 18F-FDG dose [hereafter referred to as 75%Sim, 50%Sim, 25%Sim, 12.5%Sim, and 6.25%Sim, respectively]). A U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved CNN was used to augment input simulated low-dose scans to full-dose scans. For each follow-up scan after induction chemotherapy, the standardized uptake value (SUV) response score was calculated as the maximum SUV (SUVmax) of the tumor normalized to the mean liver SUV; tumor response was classified as adequate or inadequate. Sensitivity and specificity in the detection of correct response status were computed using full-dose PET as the reference standard.
RESULTS: With decreasing simulated radiotracer doses, tumor SUVmax increased. A dose below 75%Sim of the full dose led to erroneous upstaging of adequate responders to inadequate responders (43% [six of 14 patients] for 75%Sim; 93% [13 of 14 patients] for 50%Sim; and 100% [14 of 14 patients] below 50%Sim; P < .05 for all). CNN-enhanced low-dose PET/MRI scans at 75%Sim and 50%Sim enabled correct response assessments for all patients. Use of the CNN augmentation for assessing adequate and inadequate responses resulted in identical sensitivities (100%) and specificities (100%) between the assessment of 100% full-dose PET, augmented 75%Sim, and augmented 50%Sim images.
CONCLUSION: CNN enhancement of PET/MRI scans may enable 50% 18F-FDG dose reduction with correct treatment response assessment of children and young adults with lymphoma.Keywords: Pediatrics, PET/MRI, Computer Applications Detection/Diagnosis, Lymphoma, Tumor Response, Whole-Body Imaging, Technology AssessmentClinical trial registration no: NCT01542879 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer Applications Detection/Diagnosis; Lymphoma; PET/MRI; Pediatrics; Technology Assessment; Tumor Response; Whole-Body Imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 34870211      PMCID: PMC8637226          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  46 in total

1.  Cumulative effective doses from radiologic procedures for pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Bilal A Ahmed; Bairbre L Connolly; Puneet Shroff; Amy Lee Chong; Christopher Gordon; Ronald Grant; Mark L Greenberg; Karen E Thomas
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Reduction of 18F-FDG Dose in Clinical PET/MR Imaging by Using Silicon Photomultiplier Detectors.

Authors:  Tetsuro Sekine; Gaspar Delso; Konstantinos G Zeimpekis; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Martin Huellner; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  How PET/MR Can Add Value For Children With Cancer.

Authors:  Heike Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2017-02-21

4.  Performance of a Deep-Learning Neural Network Model in Assessing Skeletal Maturity on Pediatric Hand Radiographs.

Authors:  David B Larson; Matthew C Chen; Matthew P Lungren; Safwan S Halabi; Nicholas V Stence; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  How to Provide Gadolinium-Free PET/MR Cancer Staging of Children and Young Adults in Less than 1 h: the Stanford Approach.

Authors:  Anne M Muehe; Ashok J Theruvath; Lillian Lai; Maryam Aghighi; Andrew Quon; Samantha J Holdsworth; Jia Wang; Sandra Luna-Fineman; Neyssa Marina; Ranjana Advani; Jarrett Rosenberg; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Diagnostic value of PET/CT for the staging and restaging of pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Margit Kleis; Heike Daldrup-Link; Katherine Matthay; Robert Goldsby; Ying Lu; Tibor Schuster; Carole Schreck; Philip W Chu; Randall A Hawkins; Benjamin L Franc
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence applications for pediatric oncology imaging.

Authors:  Heike Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16

8.  Association of Exposure to Diagnostic Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation With Risk of Cancer Among Youths in South Korea.

Authors:  Jae-Young Hong; Kyungdo Han; Jin-Hyung Jung; Jung Sun Kim
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04

9.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21

10.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence for Radiation Dose Optimization in Pediatric Radiology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Curtise K C Ng
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.