Literature DB >> 28914600

Reduction of 18F-FDG Dose in Clinical PET/MR Imaging by Using Silicon Photomultiplier Detectors.

Tetsuro Sekine1, Gaspar Delso1, Konstantinos G Zeimpekis1, Felipe de Galiza Barbosa1, Edwin E G W Ter Voert1, Martin Huellner1, Patrick Veit-Haibach1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the level of clinically acceptable reduction in injected fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dose in time-of-flight (TOF)-positron emission tomography(PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging by using silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) detectors compared with TOF-PET/computed tomography (CT) using Lu1.8Y0.2SiO5(Ce), or LYSO, detectors in patients with different body mass indexes (BMIs). Materials and Methods Patients were enrolled in this study as part of a larger prospective study with a different purpose than evaluated in this study (NCT02316431). All patients gave written informed consent prior to inclusion into the study. In this study, 74 patients with different malignant diseases underwent sequential whole-body TOF-PET/CT and TOF-PET/MR imaging. PET images with simulated reduction of injected 18F-FDG doses were generated by unlisting the list-mode data from PET/MR imaging. Two readers rated the image quality of whole-body data sets, as well as the image quality in each body compartment, and evaluated the conspicuity of malignant lesions. Results The image quality with 70% or 60% of the injected dose of 18F-FDG at PET/MR imaging was comparable to that at PET/CT. With 50% of the injected dose, comparable image quality was maintained among patients with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2. PET images without TOF reconstruction showed higher artifact scores and deteriorated sharpness than those with TOF reconstruction. Conclusion Sixty percent of the usually injected 18F-FDG dose (reduction of up to 40%) in patients with a BMI of more than 25 kg/m2 results in clinically adequate PET image quality in TOF-PET/MR imaging performed by using SiPM detectors. Additionally, in patients with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2, 50% of the injected dose may safely be used. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28914600     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  Comprehensive anatomical and functional imaging in patients with type I neurofibromatosis using simultaneous FDG-PET/MRI.

Authors:  Christian Philipp Reinert; Martin Ulrich Schuhmann; Benjamin Bender; Isabel Gugel; Christian la Fougère; Jürgen Schäfer; Sergios Gatidis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Digital PET/CT: a new intriguing chance for clinical nuclear medicine and personalized molecular imaging.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Nicoletta Urbano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Summary of the First ISMRM-SNMMI Workshop on PET/MRI: Applications and Limitations.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Zahi A Fayad; Kathryn J Fowler; Dawn Holley; Andrei Iagaru; Alan B McMillan; Patrick Veit-Haiback; Robert J Witte; Greg Zaharchuk; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Image quality and lesion detectability in low-dose pediatric 18F-FDG scans using total-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Yu-Mo Zhao; Ying-He Li; Tao Chen; Wei-Guang Zhang; Lin-Hao Wang; Jiatai Feng; Chenwei Li; Xu Zhang; Wei Fan; Ying-Ying Hu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Impact of different image reconstructions on PET quantification in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Messerli; Fotis Kotasidis; Irene A Burger; Daniela A Ferraro; Urs J Muehlematter; Corina Weyermann; David Kenkel; Gustav K von Schulthess; Philipp A Kaufmann; Martin W Huellner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Artificial intelligence enables whole-body positron emission tomography scans with minimal radiation exposure.

Authors:  Yan-Ran Joyce Wang; Lucia Baratto; K Elizabeth Hawk; Ashok J Theruvath; Allison Pribnow; Avnesh S Thakor; Sergios Gatidis; Rong Lu; Santosh E Gummidipundi; Jordi Garcia-Diaz; Daniel Rubin; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  [18F]Fluorocholine Uptake of Parathyroid Adenoma Is Correlated with Parathyroid Hormone Level.

Authors:  Abdullah A Alharbi; Fahad M Alshehri; Abdulrahman A Albatly; Bert-Ram Sah; Christoph Schmid; Gerhard F Huber; Martin W Huellner
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  SUVmax for predicting regional control in oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Lisa W Lekanne Dit Deprez; Grégoire B Morand; Christian Thüring; Shila Pazahr; Martin W Hüllner; Martina A Broglie
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Emerging role of integrated PET-MRI in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Amarnath Jena; Sangeeta Taneja; Prerana Rana; Nidhi Goyal; Abhishek Vaish; Rajesh Botchu; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  A pilot study on lung cancer detection based on regional metabolic activity distribution in digital low-dose 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Michael Messerli; Urs J Muehlematter; Saskia Fassbind; Daniel Franzen; Daniela A Ferraro; Martin W Huellner; Valerie Treyer; Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro; Irene A Burger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.