Literature DB >> 29881073

High-Efficiency Response Distribution-Based Item Selection Algorithms for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Chanjin Zheng1,2, Hua-Hua Chang2.   

Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT) purports to obtain useful diagnostic information with great efficiency brought by CAT technology. Most of the existing CD-CAT item selection algorithms are evaluated when test length is fixed and relatively long, but some applications of CD-CAT, such as in interim assessment, require to obtain the cognitive pattern with a short test. The mutual information (MI) algorithm proposed by Wang is the first endeavor to accommodate this need. To reduce the computational burden, Wang provided a simplified scheme, but at the price of scale/sign change in the original index. As a result, it is very difficult to combine it with some popular constraint management methods. The current study proposes two high-efficiency algorithms, posterior-weighted cognitive diagnostic model (CDM) discrimination index (PWCDI) and posterior-weighted attribute-level CDM discrimination index (PWACDI), by modifying the CDM discrimination index. They can be considered as an extension of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) and posterior-weighted KL (PWKL) methods. A pre-calculation strategy has also been developed to address the computational issue. Simulation studies indicate that the newly developed methods can produce results comparable with or better than the MI and PWKL in both short and long tests. The other major advantage is that the computational issue has been addressed more elegantly than MI. PWCDI and PWACDI can run as fast as PWKL. More importantly, they do not suffer from the problem of scale/sign change as MI and, thus, can be used with constraint management methods together in a straightforward manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDI; MI; PWACDI; PWCDI; PWKL; SHE

Year:  2016        PMID: 29881073      PMCID: PMC5978723          DOI: 10.1177/0146621616665196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  1 in total

1.  A Rate Function Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jingchen Liu; Zhiliang Ying; Stephanie Zhang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.500

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.

Authors:  Hulya D Yigit; Miguel A Sorrel; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-09-18

2.  Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Hua-Hua Chang; Jian Tao; Ningzhong Shi
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-12-21

3.  Flexible Computerized Adaptive Tests to Detect Misconceptions and Estimate Ability Simultaneously.

Authors:  Yu Bao; Yawei Shen; Shiyu Wang; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-11-06

4.  Combining Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Hao Luo; Daxun Wang; Zhiming Guo; Yan Cai; Dongbo Tu
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-04-18

5.  Dual-Objective Item Selection Methods in Computerized Adaptive Test Using the Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnostic Models.

Authors:  Chongqin Xi; Dongbo Tu; Yan Cai
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-05-20

6.  A New Method to Balance Measurement Accuracy and Attribute Coverage in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Xiaojian Sun; Björn Andersson; Tao Xin
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-09-15

7.  Reducing the Misclassification Costs of Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing: Item Selection With Minimum Expected Risk.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Hsu; Wen-Chung Wang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-03-01

8.  Spectral Clustering Algorithm for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment.

Authors:  Lei Guo; Jing Yang; Naiqing Song
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.