Literature DB >> 12354641

A quantitative study of fungiform papillae and taste pore density in adults and children.

Carolina Segovia1, Ian Hutchinson, David G Laing, Anthony L Jinks.   

Abstract

Male children (8-9 years) are reported to have a higher sensitivity than male adults to the sweet tastant sucrose when small regions of the anterior tongue are stimulated. The present study investigated the hypothesis that the higher sensitivity was due to a greater density of fungiform papillae and taste pores (buds), since it has been reported in adults that increased densities of these two structures correlates with increased taste suprathreshold sensitivity [Physiol. Behav. 47 (1990) 1213]. Quantitative measures of the number and size of papillae and pores in two areas of the tongue that had been shown to have a higher sensitivity for sucrose were achieved in 20 male children 8-9 years of age and 20 adults 18-30 years of age, using videomicroscopy and NIH Image software. Customized templates and a red food dye were used to define the equivalent tongue locations across the 40 subjects and taste pores were stained with methylene blue. Children were found to have substantially smaller papillae than adults but significantly higher papilla densities in both areas. Similar numbers of taste pores per papilla were found for both groups, resulting in children having much higher taste pore densities in each area than adults. Other differences included smaller taste pore diameters in children compared to adults, and the papillae tended to be rounder in children. Overall, the results support the hypothesis that the higher densities of fungiform papillae and taste pores in children underlie their greater sensitivity for sucrose in the two areas. In addition, the anatomical differences between adults and children indicate the sense of taste is in a state of development during mid-childhood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12354641     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-3806(02)00463-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Dev Brain Res        ISSN: 0165-3806


  18 in total

1.  Reduced taste function and taste papillae density in children with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Maryam Correa; David G Laing; Ian Hutchinson; Anthony L Jinks; Jessica E Armstrong; Gad Kainer
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Evaluation of the fungiform papillae number in Behçet's disease.

Authors:  Gökçen Akçiçek; Nihal Avcu; Serdar Uysal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  TongueSim: Development of an Automated Method for Rapid Assessment of Fungiform Papillae Density for Taste Research.

Authors:  Shourjya Sanyal; Shauna M O'Brien; John E Hayes; Emma L Feeney
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli.

Authors:  Emma L Feeney; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Reduced number of taste papillae in patients with eating disorders.

Authors:  L Wöckel; A Jacob; M Holtmann; F Poustka
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Fungiform papillae density in patients with burning mouth syndrome and xerostomia.

Authors:  Fabio Camacho-Alonso; Pía López-Jornet; Diana Molino-Pagán
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

7.  An automated method to detect and quantify fungiform papillae in the human tongue: Validation and relationship to phenotypical differences in taste perception.

Authors:  Sally Eldeghaidy; Daniel Thomas; Martha Skinner; Rebecca Ford; Timo Giesbrecht; Anna Thomas; Joanne Hort; Susan Francis
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-12-06

8.  Evaluation of young smokers and non-smokers with Electrogustometry and Contact Endoscopy.

Authors:  Pavlidis Pavlos; Nikolaidis Vasilios; Anogeianaki Antonia; Koutsonikolas Dimitrios; Kekes Georgios; Anogianakis Georgios
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2009-08-20

9.  No Difference in Perceived Intensity of Linoleic Acid in the Oral Cavity between Obese and Nonobese Individuals.

Authors:  Robin M Tucker; Tiffany M Nuessle; Nicole L Garneau; Gregory Smutzer; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 10.  Factors Influencing the Phenotypic Characterization of the Oral Marker, PROP.

Authors:  Beverly J Tepper; Melania Melis; Yvonne Koelliker; Paolo Gasparini; Karen L Ahijevych; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.