Literature DB >> 34857535

Phase 2 Trial of Rituximab in Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: The BeatMG Study.

Richard J Nowak1, Christopher S Coffey2, Jonathan M Goldstein3, Mazen M Dimachkie4, Michael Benatar5, John T Kissel6, Gil I Wolfe7, Ted M Burns8, Miriam L Freimer6, Sharon Nations9, Volkan Granit10,5, A Gordon Smith11, David P Richman12, Emma Ciafaloni13, Muhammad T Al-Lozi14, Laura Ann Sams15, Dianna Quan16, Eroboghene Ubogu17, Brenda Pearson2, Aditi Sharma18,19, Jon W Yankey2, Liz Uribe2, Michael Shy20, Anthony A Amato21, Robin Conwit22, Kevin C O'Connor18, David A Hafler18, Merit E Cudkowicz23, Richard J Barohn4,24.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rituximab is safe and potentially beneficial, warranting further investigation in an efficacy trial for acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized MG (AChR-Ab+ gMG).
METHODS: The B-Cell Targeted Treatment in MG (BeatMG) study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase-2 trial that utilized a futility design. Individuals 21-90 years of age, with AChR-Ab+ gMG (MG Foundation of America Class II-IV) and receiving prednisone ≥15 mg/day were eligible. The primary outcome was a measure of steroid-sparing effect, defined as the proportion achieving ≥75% reduction in mean daily prednisone dose in the 4-weeks prior to week 52 and with clinical improvement or no significant worsening as compared to the 4-week period prior to randomization. The co-primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included MG-specific clinical assessments. Fifty-two individuals were randomized (1:1) to either a two-cycle rituximab/placebo regimen, with follow-up through 52-weeks.
RESULTS: Of the 52 participants included, mean (±SD) age at enrollment was 55.1 (±17.1) years; 23 (44.2%) were female, and 31 (59.6%) were MGFA Class II. The mean (±SD) baseline prednisone dose was 22.1 (±9.7) mg/day. The primary steroid-sparing outcome was achieved in 60% of those on rituximab vs. 56% on placebo. The study reached its futility endpoint (p=0.03) suggesting that the pre-defined clinically meaningful improvement of 30% due to rituximab over placebo was unlikely to be achieved in a subsequent, larger trial. No safety issues identified.
CONCLUSIONS: While rituximab was safe and well-tolerated, these results suggest that there is a low probability of observing the defined clinically meaningful steroid-sparing effect over a 12-month period in a phase-3 trial of mild-moderately symptomatic AChR-Ab+ gMG. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for mild-to-moderate AChR-Ab+ gMG, compared with placebo, rituximab is safe but unlikely to reduce steroid use by an absolute difference of at least 30% at 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02110706.
© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34857535      PMCID: PMC8793103          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   11.800


  18 in total

Review 1.  B-cell targeting: a novel approach to immune intervention today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Thomas Dörner; Peter E Lipsky
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.388

2.  Response of patients with refractory myasthenia gravis to rituximab: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Richard J Nowak; Daniel B Dicapua; Nazlee Zebardast; Jonathan M Goldstein
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 3.  CD20-depleting therapy in autoimmune diseases: from basic research to the clinic.

Authors:  F Perosa; M Prete; V Racanelli; F Dammacco
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Long-lasting treatment effect of rituximab in MuSK myasthenia.

Authors:  J Díaz-Manera; E Martínez-Hernández; L Querol; R Klooster; R Rojas-García; X Suárez-Calvet; J L Muñoz-Blanco; C Mazia; K R Straasheijm; E Gallardo; C Juárez; J J Verschuuren; I Illa
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Rituximab treatment of myasthenia gravis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rup Tandan; Michael K Hehir; Waqar Waheed; Diantha B Howard
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 6.  A review: the use of rituximab in neuromuscular diseases.

Authors:  Homam Ibrahim; Mazen M Dimachkie; Aziz Shaibani
Journal:  J Clin Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2010-12

7.  Successful treatment of refractory generalized myasthenia gravis with rituximab.

Authors:  C Lebrun; V Bourg; N Tieulie; P Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.089

8.  Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jonathan C W Edwards; Leszek Szczepanski; Jacek Szechinski; Anna Filipowicz-Sosnowska; Paul Emery; David R Close; Randall M Stevens; Tim Shaw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  An international, phase III, randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  D B Sanders; I K Hart; R Mantegazza; S S Shukla; Z A Siddiqi; M H V De Baets; A Melms; M W Nicolle; N Solomons; D P Richman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Clinical characteristics of refractory myasthenia gravis patients.

Authors:  Joome Suh; Jonathan M Goldstein; Richard J Nowak
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2013-06-13
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Novel pathophysiological insights in autoimmune myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Gianvito Masi; Kevin C O'Connor
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.283

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab for New-Onset Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: The RINOMAX Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fredrik Piehl; Ann Eriksson-Dufva; Anna Budzianowska; Amalia Feresiadou; William Hansson; Max Albert Hietala; Irene Håkansson; Rune Johansson; Daniel Jons; Ivan Kmezic; Christopher Lindberg; Jonas Lindh; Fredrik Lundin; Ingela Nygren; Anna Rostedt Punga; Rayomand Press; Kristin Samuelsson; Peter Sundström; Oskar Wickberg; Susanna Brauner; Thomas Frisell
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 29.907

3.  Heterogeneity of Acetylcholine Receptor Autoantibody-Mediated Complement Activity in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis.

Authors:  Abeer H Obaid; Chryssa Zografou; Douangsone D Vadysirisack; Bailey Munro-Sheldon; Miriam L Fichtner; Bhaskar Roy; William M Philbrick; Jeffrey L Bennett; Richard J Nowak; Kevin C O'Connor
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 4.  Pharmacotherapy of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis with Special Emphasis on Newer Biologicals.

Authors:  Deepak Menon; Vera Bril
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 5.  Corticosteroid Treatment-Resistance in Myasthenia Gravis.

Authors:  Henry J Kaminski; Jordan Denk
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Knowledge mapping of targeted immunotherapy for myasthenia gravis from 1998 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Yue Su; Zhe Ruan; Rui Wang; Sijia Hao; Yonglan Tang; Xiaoxi Huang; Ting Gao; Zhuyi Li; Ting Chang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 7.  Current Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis.

Authors:  Mohammed K Alhaidar; Sumayyah Abumurad; Betty Soliven; Kourosh Rezania
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.