OBJECTIVE: Rituximab has emerged as an efficacious option for drug-resistant myasthenia gravis (MG). However, reports published only describe the short-term follow-up of patients treated and little is known about their long-term clinical and immunologic evolution. Our objective was to report the clinical and immunologic long-term follow-up of 17 patients (6 MuSK+MG and 11 AChR+MG) and compare the response between AChR+MG and MuSK+MG patients. METHODS: Myasthenia Gravis Foundation America postintervention status and changes in treatment and antibody titers were periodically determined. Lymphocyte subpopulations, total immunoglobulin, immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-MuSK subclasses, and anti-tetanus toxoid IgG before and after treatment were also studied. RESULTS: After a mean post-treatment period of 31 months, 10 of the AChR+MG patients improved but 6 of them needed reinfusions. In contrast, all MuSK+MG patients achieved a remission (4/6) or minimal manifestations (2/6) status and no reinfusions were needed. Consequently, in the MuSK+MG group, prednisone doses were significantly reduced and concomitant immunosuppressants could be withdrawn. Clinical improvement was associated with a significant decrease in the antibody titers only in the 6 MuSK+MG patients. At last follow-up MuSK antibodies were negative in 3 of these patients and showed a decrease of over 80% in the other 3. CONCLUSION: In view of the long-lasting benefit observed in MuSK+MG patients, we recommend to use rituximab as an early therapeutic option in this group of patients with MG if they do not respond to prednisone. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that IV rituximab improves the clinical and immunologic status of patients with MuSK+MG.
OBJECTIVE:Rituximab has emerged as an efficacious option for drug-resistant myasthenia gravis (MG). However, reports published only describe the short-term follow-up of patients treated and little is known about their long-term clinical and immunologic evolution. Our objective was to report the clinical and immunologic long-term follow-up of 17 patients (6 MuSK+MG and 11 AChR+MG) and compare the response between AChR+MG and MuSK+MG patients. METHODS:Myasthenia Gravis Foundation America postintervention status and changes in treatment and antibody titers were periodically determined. Lymphocyte subpopulations, total immunoglobulin, immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-MuSK subclasses, and anti-tetanus toxoid IgG before and after treatment were also studied. RESULTS: After a mean post-treatment period of 31 months, 10 of the AChR+MG patients improved but 6 of them needed reinfusions. In contrast, all MuSK+MG patients achieved a remission (4/6) or minimal manifestations (2/6) status and no reinfusions were needed. Consequently, in the MuSK+MG group, prednisone doses were significantly reduced and concomitant immunosuppressants could be withdrawn. Clinical improvement was associated with a significant decrease in the antibody titers only in the 6 MuSK+MG patients. At last follow-up MuSK antibodies were negative in 3 of these patients and showed a decrease of over 80% in the other 3. CONCLUSION: In view of the long-lasting benefit observed in MuSK+MG patients, we recommend to use rituximab as an early therapeutic option in this group of patients with MG if they do not respond to prednisone. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that IV rituximab improves the clinical and immunologic status of patients with MuSK+MG.
Authors: Lauren Gluck; Amanda L Hernandez; Sarah F Wesley; Robert K Fulbright; Erin E Longbrake; Panos Stathopoulos Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Jason A Vander Heiden; Panos Stathopoulos; Julian Q Zhou; Luan Chen; Tamara J Gilbert; Christopher R Bolen; Richard J Barohn; Mazen M Dimachkie; Emma Ciafaloni; Teresa J Broering; Francois Vigneault; Richard J Nowak; Steven H Kleinstein; Kevin C O'Connor Journal: J Immunol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Raffi Topakian; Fritz Zimprich; Stephan Iglseder; Norbert Embacher; Michael Guger; Karl Stieglbauer; Dieter Langenscheidt; Jakob Rath; Stefan Quasthoff; Philipp Simschitz; Julia Wanschitz; David Windisch; Petra Müller; Dierk Oel; Günther Schustereder; Stefan Einsiedler; Christian Eggers; Wolfgang Löscher Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 4.849