Gianvito Masi1,2, Kevin C O'Connor1,2. 1. Department of Neurology. 2. Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent insights into the immunopathogenesis of autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG). Mechanistic understanding is presented according to MG disease subtypes and by leveraging the knowledge gained through the use of immunomodulating biological therapeutics. RECENT FINDINGS: The past two years of research on MG have led to a more accurate definition of the mechanisms through which muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies induce pathology. Novel insights have also emerged from the collection of stronger evidence on the pathogenic capacity of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 autoantibodies. Clinical observations have revealed a new MG phenotype triggered by cancer immunotherapy, but the underlying immunobiology remains undetermined. From a therapeutic perspective, MG patients can now benefit from a wider spectrum of treatment options. Such therapies have uncovered profound differences in clinical responses between and within the acetylcholine receptor and MuSK MG subtypes. Diverse mechanisms of immunopathology between the two subtypes, as well as qualitative nuances in the autoantibody repertoire of each patient, likely underpin the variability in therapeutic outcomes. Although predictive biomarkers of clinical response are lacking, these observations have ignited the development of assays that might assist clinicians in the choice of specific therapeutic strategies. SUMMARY: Recent advances in the understanding of autoantibody functionalities are bringing neuroimmunologists closer to a more detailed appreciation of the mechanisms that govern MG pathology. Future investigations on the immunological heterogeneity among MG patients will be key to developing effective, individually tailored therapies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent insights into the immunopathogenesis of autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG). Mechanistic understanding is presented according to MG disease subtypes and by leveraging the knowledge gained through the use of immunomodulating biological therapeutics. RECENT FINDINGS: The past two years of research on MG have led to a more accurate definition of the mechanisms through which muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies induce pathology. Novel insights have also emerged from the collection of stronger evidence on the pathogenic capacity of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 autoantibodies. Clinical observations have revealed a new MG phenotype triggered by cancer immunotherapy, but the underlying immunobiology remains undetermined. From a therapeutic perspective, MG patients can now benefit from a wider spectrum of treatment options. Such therapies have uncovered profound differences in clinical responses between and within the acetylcholine receptor and MuSK MG subtypes. Diverse mechanisms of immunopathology between the two subtypes, as well as qualitative nuances in the autoantibody repertoire of each patient, likely underpin the variability in therapeutic outcomes. Although predictive biomarkers of clinical response are lacking, these observations have ignited the development of assays that might assist clinicians in the choice of specific therapeutic strategies. SUMMARY: Recent advances in the understanding of autoantibody functionalities are bringing neuroimmunologists closer to a more detailed appreciation of the mechanisms that govern MG pathology. Future investigations on the immunological heterogeneity among MG patients will be key to developing effective, individually tailored therapies.
Authors: Benison Keung; Kimberly R Robeson; Daniel B DiCapua; Jennifer B Rosen; Kevin C O'Connor; Jonathan M Goldstein; Richard J Nowak Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Gianvito Masi; Yingkai Li; Tabitha Karatz; Minh C Pham; Seneca R Oxendine; Richard J Nowak; Jeffrey T Guptill; Kevin C O'Connor Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 3.221
Authors: Vera Bril; Michael Benatar; Henning Andersen; John Vissing; Melissa Brock; Bernhard Greve; Peter Kiessling; Franz Woltering; Laura Griffin; Peter Van den Bergh Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 9.910