Literature DB >> 34854477

Supervised two-dimensional functional principal component analysis with time-to-event outcomes and mammogram imaging data.

Shu Jiang1, Jiguo Cao2, Bernard Rosner3, Graham A Colditz1.   

Abstract

Screening mammography aims to identify breast cancer early and secondarily measures breast density to classify women at higher or lower than average risk for future breast cancer in the general population. Despite the strong association of individual mammography features to breast cancer risk, the statistical literature on mammogram imaging data is limited. While functional principal component analysis (FPCA) has been studied in the literature for extracting image-based features, it is conducted independently of the time-to-event response variable. With the consideration of building a prognostic model for precision prevention, we present a set of flexible methods, supervised FPCA (sFPCA) and functional partial least squares (FPLS), to extract image-based features associated with the failure time while accommodating the added complication from right censoring. Throughout the article, we hope to demonstrate that one method is favored over the other under different clinical setups. The proposed methods are applied to the motivating data set from the Joanne Knight Breast Health cohort at Siteman Cancer Center. Our approaches not only obtain the best prediction performance compared to the benchmark model, but also reveal different risk patterns within the mammograms.
© 2021 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional partial least squares; functional principal component analysis; image analysis; risk prediction; survival analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34854477      PMCID: PMC9160217          DOI: 10.1111/biom.13611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   1.701


  19 in total

1.  Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data.

Authors:  E Graf; C Schmoor; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999 Sep 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Partial Cox regression analysis for high-dimensional microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Hongzhe Li; Jiang Gui
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Inverse probability weighting in nested case-control studies with additional matching--a simulation study.

Authors:  Nathalie C Støer; Sven Ove Samuelsen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Impact of adding breast density to breast cancer risk models: A systematic review.

Authors:  Bolette Mikela Vilmun; Ilse Vejborg; Elsebeth Lynge; Martin Lillholm; Mads Nielsen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Jonathan Frederik Carlsen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Deviance residuals-based sparse PLS and sparse kernel PLS regression for censored data.

Authors:  Philippe Bastien; Frédéric Bertrand; Nicolas Meyer; Myriam Maumy-Bertrand
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  The performance of risk prediction models.

Authors:  Thomas A Gerds; Tianxi Cai; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Detecting mammographically occult cancer in women with dense breasts using deep convolutional neural network and Radon Cumulative Distribution Transform.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-12-24

8.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Functional Principal Component Analysis and Randomized Sparse Clustering Algorithm for Medical Image Analysis.

Authors:  Nan Lin; Junhai Jiang; Shicheng Guo; Momiao Xiong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer: A Life-Table Model.

Authors:  Nora Pashayan; Steve Morris; Fiona J Gilbert; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  1 in total

1.  Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort at Siteman Cancer Center.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Debbie L Bennett; Jennifer Tappenden; Courtney Beers; Nicole Ackermann; Ningying Wu; Jingqin Luo; Sarah Humble; Erin Linnenbringer; Kia Davis; Shu Jiang; Adetunji T Toriola
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.506

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.