Literature DB >> 31890746

Detecting mammographically occult cancer in women with dense breasts using deep convolutional neural network and Radon Cumulative Distribution Transform.

Juhun Lee1, Robert M Nishikawa1.   

Abstract

We have applied the Radon Cumulative Distribution Transform (RCDT) as an image transformation to highlight the subtle difference between left and right mammograms to detect mammographically occult (MO) cancer in women with dense breasts and negative screening mammograms. We developed deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as classifiers for estimating the probability of having MO cancer. We acquired screening mammograms of 333 women (97 unilateral MO cancer) with dense breasts and at least two consecutive mammograms and used the immediate prior mammograms, which radiologists interpreted as negative. We used fivefold cross validation to divide our dataset into a training and independent test sets with ratios of 0.8:0.2. We set aside 10% of the training set as a validation set. We applied RCDT on the left and right mammograms of each view. We applied inverse Radon transform to represent the resulting RCDT images in the image domain. We then fine-tuned a VGG16 network pretrained on ImageNet using the resulting images per each view. The CNNs achieved mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve of 0.73 (standard error, SE = 0.024) and 0.73 (SE = 0.04) for the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views, respectively. We combined the scores from two CNNs by training a logistic regression classifier and it achieved a mean AUC of 0.81 (SE = 0.032). In conclusion, we showed that inverse Radon-transformed RCDT images contain information useful for detecting MO cancers and that deep CNNs could learn such information.
© 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radon Cumulative Distribution Transform; computer-aided diagnosis; deep learning; dense breast; occult breast cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31890746      PMCID: PMC6929683          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.4.044502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  11 in total

1.  The Radon Cumulative Distribution Transform and Its Application to Image Classification.

Authors:  Soheil Kolouri; Se Rim Park; Gustavo K Rohde
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  Deep learning in medical imaging and radiation therapy.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Aria Pezeshk; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Xiaosong Wang; Karen Drukker; Kenny H Cha; Ronald M Summers; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quantifying masking in clinical mammograms via local detectability of simulated lesions.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Olivier Alonzo-Proulx; Roberta A Jong; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends.

Authors:  Azam Hamidinekoo; Erika Denton; Andrik Rampun; Kate Honnor; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Olivier Alonzo-Proulx; Taghreed I Alshafeiy; James T Patrie; Jennifer A Harvey; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  2 in total

1.  Identifying Women With Mammographically- Occult Breast Cancer Leveraging GAN-Simulated Mammograms.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Supervised two-dimensional functional principal component analysis with time-to-event outcomes and mammogram imaging data.

Authors:  Shu Jiang; Jiguo Cao; Bernard Rosner; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 1.701

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.