Literature DB >> 18663757

The performance of risk prediction models.

Thomas A Gerds1, Tianxi Cai, Martin Schumacher.   

Abstract

For medical decision making and patient information, predictions of future status variables play an important role. Risk prediction models can be derived with many different statistical approaches. To compare them, measures of predictive performance are derived from ROC methodology and from probability forecasting theory. These tools can be applied to assess single markers, multivariable regression models and complex model selection algorithms. This article provides a systematic review of the modern way of assessing risk prediction models. Particular attention is put on proper benchmarks and resampling techniques that are important for the interpretation of measured performance. All methods are illustrated with data from a clinical study in head and neck cancer patients. (c) 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18663757     DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200810443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  75 in total

1.  External validity of risk models: Use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients.

Authors:  Yvonne Vergouwe; Karel G M Moons; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Validation of the high-dose heparin confirmatory step for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Nicole L Whitlatch; David F Kong; Ara D Metjian; Gowthami M Arepally; Thomas L Ortel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  A Roadmap for the Development of Applied Computational Psychiatry.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus; Quentin J M Huys; Tiago V Maia
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-09

Review 4.  Prediction models for risk classification in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Predicting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtype Using Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms for Breast Cancer Risk and Several Variable Selection Methods.

Authors:  Lothar Häberle; Alexander Hein; Matthias Rübner; Michael Schneider; Arif B Ekici; Paul Gass; Arndt Hartmann; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Wing-Yee Lo; Werner Schroth; Hiltrud Brauch; Peter A Fasching; Marius Wunderle
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 6.  Multidimensionality of microarrays: statistical challenges and (im)possible solutions.

Authors:  Stefan Michiels; Andrew Kramar; Serge Koscielny
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Prediction of coronary artery disease risk based on multiple longitudinal biomarkers.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Menggang Yu; Sujuan Gao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  The Wally plot approach to assess the calibration of clinical prediction models.

Authors:  Paul Blanche; Thomas A Gerds; Claus T Ekstrøm
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  The validation and assessment of machine learning: a game of prediction from high-dimensional data.

Authors:  Tune H Pers; Anders Albrechtsen; Claus Holst; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Thomas A Gerds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.