Robert Nash1, Sofia Otero2, Jeremy Lavy1. 1. a Cochlear Implant Department , Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital , London , UK. 2. b Radiology Department , Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital , London , UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: It is recognised that CT can be used to determine the cochlear duct length (CDL) when selecting an electrode for cochlear implantation. It is the practice of our institution to routinely use MRI as the sole modality of pre-operative imaging in the assessment of children referred for consideration of cochlear implantation. We therefore wanted to determine whether MRI could be reliably used to determine cochlear duct length. METHODS: An analysis of 40 ears that had undergone MRI and CT of the temporal bones was undertaken. The diameter of the basal turn was independently measured for each ear using the two modalities, and CDL was then calculated. RESULTS: The mean error of measurement was 0.26 mm (range 0-0.8 mm), leading to a difference in calculated CDL of 0.96 mm (range 0-2.92 mm). CDL did not predict full insertion of 28 mm cochlear implant electrodes in 30 ears. CONCLUSIONS: MRI can be used to reliably determine cochlear duct length.
OBJECTIVES: It is recognised that CT can be used to determine the cochlear duct length (CDL) when selecting an electrode for cochlear implantation. It is the practice of our institution to routinely use MRI as the sole modality of pre-operative imaging in the assessment of children referred for consideration of cochlear implantation. We therefore wanted to determine whether MRI could be reliably used to determine cochlear duct length. METHODS: An analysis of 40 ears that had undergone MRI and CT of the temporal bones was undertaken. The diameter of the basal turn was independently measured for each ear using the two modalities, and CDL was then calculated. RESULTS: The mean error of measurement was 0.26 mm (range 0-0.8 mm), leading to a difference in calculated CDL of 0.96 mm (range 0-2.92 mm). CDL did not predict full insertion of 28 mm cochlear implant electrodes in 30 ears. CONCLUSIONS: MRI can be used to reliably determine cochlear duct length.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cochlea; Cochlear implantation; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Johannes Taeger; Franz Tassilo Müller-Graff; Lukas Ilgen; Phillip Schendzielorz; Rudolf Hagen; Tilman Neun; Kristen Rak Journal: OTO Open Date: 2021-09-24
Authors: Emily S Hollis; Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Andrea L Bucker; Sarah A Dillon; Allison Young; Kristen Quinones; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell; Kevin D Brown Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 2.619
Authors: Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi; Theresa Marie Raiser; Ria Maxine Rühl; Virginia Lee Flanagin; Peter Zu Eulenburg Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: David P Herrmann; Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff; Stefan Kaulitz; Mario Cebulla; Anja Kurz; Rudolf Hagen; Tilmann Neun; Kristen Rak Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Lena Weber; Pingling Kwok; Erin M Picou; Christina Wendl; Christopher Bohr; Steven C Marcrum Journal: HNO Date: 2022-08-15 Impact factor: 1.330