| Literature DB >> 34848790 |
Shikai Zhang1,2, Wang Zhan3, Anran Sun1,2, Ying Xie1,2, Zhiming Han1,2, Xibin Qu3, Jiayi Wang3, Laifu Zhang3, Mingshun Tian3, Xuhong Pang3, Jinbao Zhang3, Xiyang Zhao4,5.
Abstract
The red color formation of Acer mandshuricum leaves is caused by the accumulation of anthocyanins primarily, but the molecular mechanism researches which underlie anthocyanin biosynthesis in A. mandshuricum were still lacking. Therefore, we combined the transcriptome and metabolome and analyzed the regulatory mechanism and accumulation pattern of anthocyanins in three different leaf color states. In our results, 26 anthocyanins were identified. Notably, the metabolite cyanidin 3-O-glucoside was found that significantly correlated with the color formation, was the predominant metabolite in anthocyanin biosynthesis of A. mandshuricum. By the way, two key structural genes ANS (Cluster-20561.86285) and BZ1 (Cluster-20561.99238) in anthocyanidin biosynthesis pathway were significantly up-regulated in RL, suggesting that they might enhance accumulation of cyanidin 3-O-glucoside which is their downstream metabolite, and contributed the red formation of A. mandshuricum leaves. Additionally, most TFs (e.g., MYBs, bZIPs and bHLHs) were detected differentially expressed in three leaf color stages that could participate in anthocyanin accumulation. This study sheds light on the anthocyanin molecular regulation of anthocyanidin biosynthesis and accumulation underlying the different leaf color change periods in A. mandshuricum, and it could provide basic theory and new insight for the leaf color related genetic improvement of A. mandshuricum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34848790 PMCID: PMC8633053 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02607-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Phenotypes of A. mandshuricum. Green (GL), half red leaf (HRL), red leaves (RL) on front (A) and back (B).
Figure 2Heatmap of anthocyanidin expression level in different groups.
Figure 3Metabolite expression level analysis of A. mandshuricum in different leaf sample groups. (A–D) DAMs in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway between four comparative groups of samples of A. mandshuricum. These DAMs were analyzed by KEGG enrichment analysis (C, GL vs HRL; D, GL vs HRL_RL; E, GL vs RL; F, HRL vs RL). (E) Venn diagram of metabolites between three compared groups of leaf samples.
Figure 4Differentially expressed genes between different colored leaves of A. mandshuricum. (A–C) Volcano plots were used to display the down-regulated, no-regulated and up-regulated genes between GL vs HRL, GL vs RL and HRL vs RL. (D) Venn map showing the common and respective DEGs between the three compared groups of leaf samples.
Figure 5Six classes of co-expressed genes and their kinetic patterns. (A) Six classes of co-expressed genes. (B) Transcription factors (TFs) were encoded by these genes in class 6.
Figure 6Modulation of phenylpropanoid, flavonoid, and anthocyanidin biosynthesis pathway genes during leaf color change in A. mandshuricum. Reconstruction of the phenylpropanoid, flavonoid and anthocyanidin biosynthetic pathways with differentially expressed structural genes. The heat map displays down-regulated and up-regulated structural genes.
Figure 7Metabolite accumulation level in anthocyanin synthesis pathways.
Figure 8Verification of phenylpropanoid, flavonoid, and anthocyanidin biosynthesis-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).