| Literature DB >> 34847175 |
Yi-Hsuan Lin1,2, Jeng-Min Chiou3, Ta-Fu Chen4, Liang-Chuan Lai5, Jen-Hau Chen6,7, Yen-Ching Chen6,8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and successful aging among community-dwelling older adults.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34847175 PMCID: PMC8631634 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The definitions of successful aging.
Characteristics of the study population at baseline (2011–2013).
| No MetS | MetS |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| n = 284 (60.8%) | n = 183 (39.2%) | ||
| Age years, mean (SD) | 72.9 (5.5) | 73.0 (5.5) | 0.92 |
| Women, n (%) | 143 (50.1) | 113 (61.8) | 0.02 |
| Married, n (%) | 231 (81.3) | 144 (78.7) | 0.48 |
| Cigarette smoking | 36 (12.7) | 34 (18.6) | 0.08 |
| Alcohol consumption | 57 (20.1) | 36 (19.7) | 0.92 |
| Physical activity (MET), mean (SD) | 1749.6 (1406.9) | 1561.2 (1425.2) | 0.06 |
| Years of education, mean (SD) | 13.9 (3.6) | 13.0 (4.0) | 0.01 |
| MoCA-T | 26.5 (3.0) | 25.8 (3.7) | 0.15 |
| Diet quality-mAHEI score | 37.6 (7.6) | 34.8 (8.0) | 0.001 |
| Daily calories (kcal), mean (SD) | 1600.8 (370.0) | 1522.3 (391.6) | 0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 23.0 (2.5) | 25.5 (3.0) | <0.001 |
| Follow-up years, mean (SD) | 4.7 (2.1) | 4.0 (2.5) | 0.01 |
| Depressive symptoms | 23 (8.1) | 26 (14.2) | 0.04 |
| Annual disposable income > $33,333 USD | 135 (47.5) | 81 (44.3) | 0.49 |
| CRP (mg/dl), mean (SD) | 0.18 (0.69) | 0.22 (0.28) | <0.001 |
| IL-6 (pg/ml), mean (SD) | 2.30 (2.19) | 2.63 (2.22) | 0.03 |
| History of chronic disease | |||
| Hypertension, n (%) | 112 (39.4) | 127 (69.4) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 13 (4.6) | 52 (28.4) | <0.001 |
| Hyperlipidemia, n (%) | 103 (36.3) | 122 (66.7) | <0.001 |
| Cardiac disease, n (%) | 64 (22.5) | 60 (32.8) | 0.01 |
| Stroke, n (%) | 5 (1.8) | 4 (2.2) | 0.74 |
| Parkinson’s disease | 3 (1.1) | 1 (0.6) | 1.00 |
| COPD, n (%) | 26 (9.2) | 22 (12.0) | 0.32 |
| Arthritis, n (%) | 86 (30.3) | 63 (34.4) | 0.35 |
| Osteoporosis, n (%) | 97 (34.2) | 54 (29.5) | 0.29 |
Abbreviations: MetS, metabolic syndrome; SD, standard deviation; y/n, yes or no; MET, metabolic equivalent of task; MoCA-T, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Taiwanese version; mAHEI, modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index; BMI, body mass index; USD, United States dollar; CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin 6; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression.
a Smoking and alcohol consumption indicated ever or current users.
b Participants with MoCA-T score ≥ 24 were categorized as normal cognition.
c mAHEI score (ranging from 0–70) includes seven food components (i.e., fruits, vegetables, soy protein, fish/(meat + eggs), whole grain, fried foods, and alcohol). Nuts were removed from the component “nuts and soy protein” because nuts are not constantly consumed by older Taiwanese adults [29].
d Depressive symptoms (yes/no) were defined as at least one of the following three factors: self-reported diagnosis, use of anti-depressive agents, or CES-D score ≥ 16.
e Annual disposable income greater than $33,333 USD indicates financially security in Taiwan.
Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables.
Mann-Whitney U tests were used for continuous variables.
The associations between MetS and successful aging over six years (n = 467).
| Variables | Overall successful aging | Domains of successful aging | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physiological | Psychological | Sociological and economic | ||||||
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| |
|
| ||||||||
| No MetS | 2.71 (1.67–4.39) | <0.001 | 5.03 (3.04–8.34) | <0.001 | 1.67 (1.06–2.65) | 0.03 | 0.95 (0.62–1.44) | 0.80 |
| No MetS×time | 1.00 (0.90–1.12) | 0.95 | 0.96 (0.84–1.10) | 0.55 | 0.94 (0.84–1.05) | 0.29 | 1.09 (0.98–1.21) | 0.13 |
|
| ||||||||
| No abdominal obesity | 1.31 (0.80–2.13) | 0.28 | 1.65 (1.02–2.67) | 0.04 | 1.15 (0.71–1.84) | 0.57 | 1.63 (1.04–2.56) | 0.03 |
| No hyperglycemia | 1.25 (0.76–2.06) | 0.38 | 1.68 (1.03–2.76) | 0.04 | 1.08 (0.66–1.75) | 0.77 | 1.17 (0.75–1.82) | 0.50 |
| No reduced HDL-C | 1.41 (0.86–2.32) | 0.17 | 2.21 (1.34–3.63) | 0.002 | 0.96 (0.56–1.55) | 0.85 | 0.68 (0.43–1.06) | 0.09 |
| No elevated triglycerides | 1.56 (0.82–2.98) | 0.17 | 1.30 (0.66–2.56) | 0.44 | 1.95 (1.02–3.74) | 0.04 | 0.76 (0.44–1.30) | 0.31 |
| No hypertension | 1.81 (1.06–3.08) | 0.03 | 2.76 (1.67–4.58) | <0.001 | 1.66 (0.98–2.79) | 0.06 | 1.10 (0.68–1.78) | 0.69 |
| No abdominal obesity×time | 1.01 (0.90–1.14) | 0.82 | 0.95 (0.85–1.07) | 0.38 | 1.00 (0.89–1.11) | 0.98 | 0.91 (0.82–1.01) | 0.08 |
| No hyperglycemia×time | 1.04 (0.94–1.16) | 0.46 | 0.96 (0.85–1.07) | 0.47 | 1.01 (0.90–1.13) | 0.87 | 1.06 (0.94–1.19) | 0.34 |
| No reduced HDL-C×time | 1.01 (0.90–1.14) | 0.87 | 1.02 (0.89–1.17) | 0.74 | 1.04 (0.93–1.17) | 0.47 | 1.04 (0.93–1.16) | 0.54 |
| No elevated triglycerides×time | 0.90 (0.77–1.05) | 0.18 | 1.05 (0.86–1.27) | 0.64 | 0.84 (0.71–0.98) | 0.03 | 1.07 (0.92–1.26) | 0.38 |
| No hypertension×time | 0.98 (0.88–1.10) | 0.76 | 0.98 (0.87–1.11) | 0.79 | 0.94 (0.84–1.04) | 0.21 | 0.99 (0.89–1.11) | 0.90 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MetS, metabolic syndrome; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; T, tertile; GLMM, generalized linear mixed model.
a The cutoff point of the successful aging score (range: -24.76 to 9.12) was based on the tertiles of the study participants. Participants in the highest tertile were defined as the successful aging group (T3: score ≥ 2.33).
The analyses were conducted by GLMM.
Model 1 and Model 2 were adjusted for time, age, sex, years of education, alcohol consumption and MetS×time interaction.
Fig 2Adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for the association between MetS status and successful aging.
Abbreviations: MetS, metabolic syndrome; Ref., reference; GLMM, generalized linear mixed model. GLMM model: Successful aging~ MetS status+ Age+ Sex+ Years of education+ Alcohol+ Time+ MetS status×time. The p values compared the differences across MetS status [no MetS, pre-MetS, and MetS (ref.)].
The associations of hypertension and HDL-C with physiological successful aging over six years stratified by important variables (baseline age, CRP, and IL-6).
| Status of MetS components | Physiological successful aging | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Physiological successful aging | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Hypertension | 62/139 | Ref. | 24/122 | Ref. | <0.001 |
| No hypertension | 55/46 | 2.55 (1.44–4.52) | 9/10 | 4.12 (1.20–14.22) | |
|
|
| ||||
| Hypertension | 60/165 | Ref. | 26/96 | Ref. | 0.36 |
| No hypertension | 48/41 | 2.51 (1.39–4.51) | 16/15 | 3.98 (1.32–11.99) | |
|
|
| ||||
| Hypertension | 54/171 | Ref. | 32/90 | Ref. | 0.25 |
| No hypertension | 48/37 | 3.89 (2.13–7.13) | 16/19 | 1.39 (0.52–3.68) | |
|
|
| ||||
| Reduced HDL-C | 32/95 | Ref. | 8/70 | Ref. | 0.89 |
| No reduced HDL-C | 85/95 | 1.92 (1.05–3.52) | 25/62 | 3.49 (1.19–10.19) | |
|
|
| ||||
| Reduced HDL-C | 24/100 | Ref. | 16/65 | Ref. | 0.60 |
| No reduced HDL-C | 84/106 | 2.16 (1.17–3.99) | 26/46 | 2.58 (1.02–6.55) | |
|
|
| ||||
| Reduced HDL-C | 30/99 | Ref. | 10/66 | Ref. | 0.05 |
| No reduced HDL-C | 72/109 | 1.65 (0.89–3.06) | 38/43 | 4.41 (1.75–11.15) |
Abbreviations: HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin 6; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; T, tertile; GLMM, generalized linear mixed model.
a The cutoff point of the physiological successful aging score (range: -15.92 to 3.50) was based on the tertiles of the study participants. Participants in the highest tertile were defined as the physiological successful aging group (T3: score ≥ 1.26).
bHigh-level CRP (≥ 0.14 mg/dl) and high-level IL-6 (≥ 2.2 pg/ml) indicated the highest tertile (T3) of CRP and IL-6 level at baseline; Low-level CRP and low-level IL-6 indicated the lower tertiles (T1+T2) of CRP and IL-6 level at baseline.
GLMM models were adjusted for MetS components, time (follow-up years), age, sex, years of education, alcohol consumption and interaction term with time for each MetS components.
Pinteractions< 0.1 was considered as statistically significant.
Sensitivity analysis for the associations between MetS and successful aging over six years (n = 467) using the biomedical model of successful aging.
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|
| No MetS | 6.38 (2.02–20.18) | 0.002 |
| No MetS×time | 0.93 (0.66–1.31) | 0.67 |
| Age (years) | 0.93 (0.87–0.99) | 0.02 |
| Women | 0.78 (0.40–1.53) | 0.47 |
| Education (years) | 1.03 (0.93–1.13) | 0.57 |
| Alcohol consumption | 0.56 (0.22–1.42) | 0.22 |
| Time (Follow-up years) | 0.95 (0.80–1.13) | 0.57 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MetS, metabolic syndrome; ADL, activity of daily living; GLMM, generalized linear mixed model.
In the biomedical model, successful aging was defined as the absence of chronic diseases, disability of ADL, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms.
The analyses were conducted by GLMM.