Literature DB >> 14662098

Imaging of ventricular function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Vikas K Rathi1, Robert W W Biederman.   

Abstract

Over the past 15 years, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has vaulted to the forefront as the ideal diagnostic modality for the evaluation of both left and right ventricular function. The accumulated literature supports this contention for the left ventricle. However, for the right ventricle, typically poorly visualized accurately by traditional imaging techniques, CMR has emerged as the test of choice. Although earlier CMR sequences have become even more robust, resulting in further improvements in spatial and temporal resolution, CMR has avidly remained the gold standard. Yet, these attributes that have so benefited investigations of the systole need not be so constrained. In this review, we discuss recent applications of CMR to the study of lusitropy, demonstrating the potential for further advances in our understanding of diastole.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14662098     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-004-0065-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  38 in total

1.  Diastolic dysfunction precedes myocardial hypertrophy in the development of hypertension.

Authors:  B C Aeschbacher; D Hutter; J Fuhrer; P Weidmann; E Delacrétaz; Y Allemann
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L R Dilworth; A M Aisen; G B Mancini; I Lande; A J Buda
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Cine MR determination of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  J A Utz; R J Herfkens; J A Heinsimer; T Bashore; R Califf; G Glover; N Pelc; A Shimakawa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis.

Authors:  P M Pattynama; H J Lamb; E A van der Velde; E E van der Wall; A de Roos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Block regional interpolation scheme for k-space (BRISK): a rapid cardiac imaging technique.

Authors:  M Doyle; E G Walsh; G G Blackwell; G M Pohost
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Left ventricular volumes measured by MR imaging.

Authors:  R B Rehr; C R Malloy; N G Filipchuk; R M Peshock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Noninvasive measurement of shortening in the fiber and cross-fiber directions in the normal human left ventricle and in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  G A MacGowan; E P Shapiro; H Azhari; C O Siu; P S Hees; G M Hutchins; J L Weiss; F E Rademakers
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Impact of arterial elastance as a measure of vascular load on left ventricular geometry in hypertension.

Authors:  P S Saba; A Ganau; R B Devereux; R Pini; T G Pickering; M J Roman
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Human heart: tagging with MR imaging--a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion.

Authors:  E A Zerhouni; D M Parish; W J Rogers; A Yang; E P Shapiro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Utility of transthoracic echocardiography to estimate severity of right ventricular dysfunction: an MRI comparison study.

Authors:  Suraj Kapa; Richard Elias; Heidi J Connolly; Imran S Syed; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Functional parameters of the left ventricle: comparison of cardiac MRI and cardiac CT in a large population.

Authors:  A Palumbo; E Maffei; C Martini; G Messalli; S Seitun; R Malagò; A Aldrovandi; E Emiliano; A Cuttone; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.

Authors:  Martin Heuschmid; Julia K Rothfuss; Stephen Schroeder; Michael Fenchel; Norbert Stauder; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas Franow; Ronald S Kuzo; Axel Kuettner; Stephan Miller; Claus D Claussen; Andreas F Kopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diagnostic efficacy of 2-shot compressed sensing cine sequence cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular function.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Xiao Li; Lu Lin; Jing-Wen Dai; Michaela Schmidt; Christoph Forman; Jing An; Zheng-Yu Jin; Yi-Ning Wang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-06

5.  Left and right ventricle assessment with Cardiac CT: validation study vs. Cardiac MR.

Authors:  Erica Maffei; Giancarlo Messalli; Chiara Martini; Koen Nieman; Onofrio Catalano; Alexia Rossi; Sara Seitun; Andrea I Guaricci; Carlo Tedeschi; Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Compressed sensing real-time cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance: accurate assessment of left ventricular function in a single-breath-hold.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kido; Teruhito Kido; Masashi Nakamura; Kouki Watanabe; Michaela Schmidt; Christoph Forman; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Comparative assessment of motion averaged free-breathing or breath-held cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocols in a porcine myocardial infarction model.

Authors:  Dinesh Selvakumar; Tejas Deshmukh; Sheryl L Foster; Naeim N Sanaei; Anthea L L Min; Stuart M Grieve; Faraz Pathan; James J H Chong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kido; Kuniaki Hirai; Ryo Ogawa; Yuki Tanabe; Masashi Nakamura; Naoto Kawaguchi; Akira Kurata; Kouki Watanabe; Michaela Schmidt; Christoph Forman; Teruhito Mochizuki; Teruhito Kido
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.364

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.