Literature DB >> 34840655

Evaluating the Effect of Incobotulinumtoxin A for Glabellar, Forehead, and Crow's Feet Lines Using A High Dilution.

Sheila C Barbarino1,2,3,4, Jani A J van Loghem1,2,3,4, Cheryl M Burgess1,2,3,4, Niamh Corduff1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As aesthetic preferences have evolved and patients wish their muscles to be relaxed, but not frozen, a higher dilution of incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) has allowed for increased spread using fewer units, yet no studies to date have investigated the efficacy, longevity, and safety of hyperdiluted INCO.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) in glabellar, forehead, and lateral periorbital lines using a high dilution.
METHODS: Subjects with moderate-to-severe upper facial lines at rest according to the Merz Aesthetics Scales™ (Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) received 15U of INCO to the glabellar (n=4 injection sites), 10U to the rest of the forehead (n=10 injection sites), and 5U to the lateral periorbital lines (n=3 injection sites/eye). Primary outcomes were physician- and subject-rated improvement at one month using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and changes in line severity using the Merz Aesthetics Scales™.
RESULTS: The study included 15 women aged 35 to 65 years. At one month, physician GAIS scores indicated 91.2% of subjects were very much improved and 8.8% were much improved; 91.5%, 78.0%, and 57.6% of participants remained at least improved at four, five, and six months, respectively. Subject GAIS scores at one month were in agreement with physician scores. At one month, an improvement of at least one point in Merz Aesthetics Scales™ scores in glabellar, forehead, and lateral periorbital lines was reported in 88.9%, 98.3%, and 94.8% of participants, respectively. Subject satisfaction was high throughout the study. No treatment-related adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSION: Hyperdilute INCO was effective at improving overall appearance and reducing line severity in individuals with moderate-to-severe upper facial lines. Patient satisfaction was maintained up to six months and treatment was well tolerated.
Copyright © 2021. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IncobotulinumtoxinA; glabellar lines; horizontal forehead lines; hyperdiluted; lateral periorbital lines

Year:  2021        PMID: 34840655      PMCID: PMC8570655     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol        ISSN: 1941-2789


  29 in total

1.  Effect of volume and concentration on the diffusion of botulinum exotoxin A.

Authors:  T S Jeffrey Hsu; Jeffrey S Dover; Kenneth A Arndt
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2004-11

2.  Validated assessment scales for the upper face.

Authors:  Timothy C Flynn; Alastair Carruthers; Jean Carruthers; Thorin L Geister; Roman Görtelmeyer; Bhushan Hardas; Silvia Himmrich; Martina Kerscher; Maurício de Maio; Cornelia Mohrmann; Rhoda S Narins; Rainer Pooth; Berthold Rzany; Gerhard Sattler; Larry Buchner; Ursula Benter; Constanze Fey; Derek Jones
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.398

3.  Dilution volume of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of glabellar rhytides: does it matter?

Authors:  Alastair Carruthers; Jean Carruthers; Joel Cohen
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 4.  Botulinum toxin: description of injection techniques and examination of controversies surrounding toxin diffusion.

Authors:  E C-H Lim; R C S Seet
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.209

Review 5.  The five D's of botulinum toxin: doses, dilution, diffusion, duration and dogma.

Authors:  Ana Paula de Sa Earp; Ellen S Marmur
Journal:  J Cosmet Laser Ther       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.247

6.  FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Jonathan A Schwitzer; Amie M Scott; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Pilot study comparing the diffusion of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A in patients with forehead hyperhidrosis.

Authors:  Ada R Trindade de Almeida; Elisa Marques; Janete de Almeida; Thais Cunha; Rosana Boraso
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.398

8.  Efficacy and Safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study.

Authors:  Martina Kerscher; Berthold Rzany; Welf Prager; Catriona Turnbull; Patrick Trevidic; Christopher Inglefield
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.398

9.  Noninferiority of incobotulinumtoxinA, free from complexing proteins, compared with another botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines.

Authors:  Gerhard Sattler; Michael J Callander; Doris Grablowitz; Torsten Walker; Eva K Bee; Berthold Rzany; Timothy Corcoran Flynn; Alastair Carruthers
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.398

10.  Multicenter, randomized, phase III study of a single dose of incobotulinumtoxinA, free from complexing proteins, in the treatment of glabellar frown lines.

Authors:  Alastair Carruthers; Jean Carruthers; William P Coleman; Lisa Donofrio; Timothy Flynn; Michael Gold; Moritz Heinz; Laura Harrington; Derek Jones; David McDaniel; Thomas Rohrer; Andrea Schlöbe; Nowell Solish; Robert A Weiss
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.