Literature DB >> 26359996

Efficacy and Safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study.

Martina Kerscher1, Berthold Rzany, Welf Prager, Catriona Turnbull, Patrick Trevidic, Christopher Inglefield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treating upper facial lines (UFL)-a combination of glabellar frown lines (GFL), horizontal forehead lines (HFL), and lateral periorbital lines (LPL)-is a common aesthetic practice.
OBJECTIVE: To provide the first placebo-controlled evidence of the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA for UFL.
METHODS: Healthy subjects (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe GFL, HFL, and LPL on the Merz Aesthetics Scales (MAS) at maximum contraction were randomized to incobotulinumtoxinA or placebo. For incobotulinumtoxinA, 54 to 64 U were administered (GFL, 20 U; HFL, 10-20 U; LPL, 24 U). Investigator-assessed MAS scores were evaluated for each area at maximum contraction on Day 30, both separately (responder = score of "none" [0] or "mild" [1]) and combined (UFL; sum score ≤3). Adverse events were recorded until 120 ± 7 days after treatment.
RESULTS: Overall, 156 subjects were treated (incobotulinumtoxinA: 105; placebo: 51). On Day 30 at maximum contraction, a significant (p ≤ .0001) effect of incobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo for GFL (84.5% vs 0.0%, respectively), HFL (70.9% vs 2.1%), LPL (64.1% vs 2.1%), and UFL combination (55.3% vs 0.0%) was demonstrated for investigator-assessed "none" or "mild" scores. Two cases of mild eyelid ptosis occurred with incobotulinumtoxinA.
CONCLUSION: IncobotulinumtoxinA demonstrated significant efficacy in treating GFL, HFL, and LPL separately and combined, as well as a good safety profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26359996     DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  6 in total

Review 1.  [New botulinum toxins for aesthetic dermatology : A comprehensive review].

Authors:  A Patil; M Kassir; U Wollina; M Goldust
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Evaluating the Effect of Incobotulinumtoxin A for Glabellar, Forehead, and Crow's Feet Lines Using A High Dilution.

Authors:  Sheila C Barbarino; Jani A J van Loghem; Cheryl M Burgess; Niamh Corduff
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-01

3.  Optimizing Facial Rejuvenation with a Combination of a Novel Topical Serum and Injectable Procedure to Increase Patient Outcomes and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sabrina G Fabi; Lisa Zaleski-Larsen; Joanna Bolton; Rahul C Mehta; Elizabeth T Makino
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Tailored botulinum toxin type A injections in aesthetic medicine: consensus panel recommendations for treating the forehead based on individual facial anatomy and muscle tone.

Authors:  Javier Anido; Daniel Arenas; Cristina Arruabarrena; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil; Carlos Fajardo; Mar Mira; Javier Murillo; Natalia Ribé; Helga Rivera; Sofia Ruiz Del Cueto; Helder Silvestre; Marisa Tirado
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2017-10-19

5.  Botulinum toxin type A for facial wrinkles.

Authors:  Cristina Pires Camargo; Jun Xia; Caroline S Costa; Rolf Gemperli; Maria Dc Tatini; Max K Bulsara; Rachel Riera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-05

Review 6.  Facial aesthetic injections in clinical practice: Pretreatment and posttreatment consensus recommendations to minimise adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Greg J Goodman; Steven Liew; Peter Callan; Sarah Hart
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 2.875

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.