| Literature DB >> 34831896 |
Xuemei Fan1, Ziyue Nan1, Yuanhang Ma1, Yingdan Zhang1, Fei Han1.
Abstract
Environmental factors in time and space play a critical role in advancing the sustainable development of the fresh agricultural product supply chain. This paper, availing the panel data of 31 Chinese provinces from 2008 to 2019, constructs a system of indicators assessing the development of the fresh agricultural product supply chain, and obtains the comprehensive development level in the Entropy Weight Method (EWM). Furthermore, it establishes a comparison between optimal solutions generated by the Instrumental Variables Method (IVM) and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) over the endogeneity issue of variables, creates the comparison between the weighted regression methods of Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) and Multi-scale Geographic Weighted Regression (MGWR), and obtains the relationship among the 14 environmental factors in their spatio-temporal impacts on the development of the fresh agricultural product supply chain. The results indicate that: (1) the environmental influencing factors in this paper have significant endogenous problems and various environmental factors impact on the fresh agricultural product supply chain in different trends and to different degrees. (2) With different bandwidths, the environmental factors could impact the fresh agricultural product supply chain to greatly varied degrees, demonstrating a strong attribute of regional correlation.Entities:
Keywords: China; endogenous problems; environmental factors; multi-scale geographic weighted regression (MGWR); sustainable development of the fresh agricultural product supply chain
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34831896 PMCID: PMC8621798 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Development assessment indicators for the FAPSC.
| Primary Indicators | Secondary Indicators | Unit | Nature | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development of the FAPSC | Output of fresh agricultural products | 10,000 tons | + | [ |
| Producer Price Index (PPI) of agricultural products | -- | − | [ | |
| Value addition of investment in | RMB 100 mn | + | [ | |
| Transaction volume of fresh agricultural products | RMB 10,000 | + | [ | |
| Number of booths in the fresh agricultural | -- | + | [ | |
| Number of multi-functional markets selling fresh | -- | + | [ | |
| Average retail price index of fresh | -- | − | [ | |
| Average Consumer Price Index (CPI) of fresh | -- | + | [ |
Indicators of the influencing factors of the development of the FAPSC.
| Primary Indicators | Secondary Indicators | Unit | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social | Number of Internet users (NIU) | 10,000 people | [ |
| Number of employed persons in the primary | 10,000 people | [ | |
| Total sown areas of farm crops (TSAFC) | 1000 hectares | [ | |
| Population (POP) | 10,000 people | [ | |
| Total number of chain retail enterprises (TNCRE) | -- | [ | |
| Economic | GDP per capita (GDPPC) | RMB | [ |
| Value addition of primary industry (VAPI) | RMB 100 mn | [ | |
| Investment in fixed assets of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery (IAFAHF) | RMB 100 mn | [ | |
| Per capita disposable income of urban households (FCDIUH) | RMB | [ | |
| Natural | Average temperature (AT) | °C | [ |
| Average relative humidity (ARH) | % | [ | |
| Precipitation (PRE) | mm | [ | |
| Sunshine hours (SH) | h | [ | |
| Total water resources (TWR) | 100 mn m3 | [ |
Weighting coefficients of indicators of the FAPSC.
| Primary Indicators | Secondary Indicators | Weighting Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| Development of the FAPSC | Output of fresh agricultural products | 0.1252 |
| Producer Price Index (PPI) of | 0.0237 | |
| Value addition of investment in | 0.0923 | |
| Transaction volume of fresh | 0.2162 | |
| Number of booths in the fresh | 0.2693 | |
| Number of multifunctional markets selling fresh agricultural products | 0.1839 | |
| Average retail price index of fresh agricultural products | 0.0446 | |
| Average Consumer Price Index (CPI) of fresh agricultural products | 0.0448 |
Figure 1Average values of development indicators of various provinces.
Average values of development indicators of various provinces’ FAPSC.
| Region | Average Value | Region | Average Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 0.1718 | Hubei | 0.2485 |
| Tianjin | 0.1325 | Hunan | 0.2446 |
| Hebei | 0.6286 | Guangdong | 0.4203 |
| Shanxi | 0.1241 | Guangxi | 0.1811 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.1551 | Hainan | 0.0709 |
| Liaoning | 0.2539 | Chongqing | 0.1799 |
| Jilin | 0.1127 | Sichuan | 0.2125 |
| Heilongjiang | 0.1385 | Guizhou | 0.1161 |
| Shanghai | 0.1732 | Yunnan | 0.1608 |
| Jiangsu | 0.4850 | Tibet | 0.0788 |
| Zhejiang | 0.5286 | Shaanxi | 0.1656 |
| Anhui | 0.1994 | Gansu | 0.1232 |
| Fujian | 0.2083 | Qinghai | 0.0622 |
| Jiangxi | 0.1570 | Ningxia | 0.1085 |
| Shandong | 0.8841 | Xinjiang | 0.1596 |
| Henan | 0.3346 |
Figure 2Specific administrative division of China.
Hausman test results.
| Hausman Test | |
|---|---|
| F-statistic | 8.7816 |
| Prob | 0.0000 |
Multiple linear regression of NEPPI.
| Variable | Coef. | Std.Error | t-Statistic | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POP | 0.1962 | 0.0055 | 35.4027 | 0.0000 |
| GDPPC | −0.0090 | 0.0005 | −16.9733 | 0.0000 |
| IAFAHF | 0.0059 | 0.0020 | 2.9252 | 0.0037 |
| AT | 2.1044 | 3.0313 | 0.6942 | 0.4880 |
| _cons | 430.5831 | 46.8276 | 9.1951 | 0.0000 |
Multiple linear regression of TNCRE.
| Variable | Coef. | Std.Error | t-Statistic | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POP | 1.2360 | 0.0914 | 13.5284 | 0.0000 |
| GDPPC | 0.1207 | 0.0087 | 13.8223 | 0.0000 |
| IAFAHF | −0.0687 | 0.0331 | −2.0745 | 0.0387 |
| AT | 289.0761 | 49.9811 | 5.7837 | 0.0000 |
| _cons | −8565.7950 | 772.1033 | −11.0941 | 0.0000 |
Multiple linear regression of VAPI.
| Variable | Coef. | Std.Error | t-Statistic | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POP | 0.4138 | 0.0127 | 32.5275 | 0.0000 |
| GDPPC | 0.0015 | 0.0012 | 1.2654 | 0.2065 |
| IAFAHF | 0.0066 | 0.0046 | 1.4401 | 0.1507 |
| AT | −18.1926 | 6.9598 | −2.0614 | 0.0093 |
| _cons | 104.3503 | 107.5151 | 0.9706 | 0.3324 |
Regression analysis with two-stage least squares (2SLS).
| Variable | Coef. | Std.Error | t-Statistic | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIU | 6.26 × 10−6 | 8.49 × 10−6 | 0.74 | 0.461 |
| NEPPI | 1.00 × 10−4 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 0.001 |
| TSAFC | −1.87 × 10−6 | 6.26 × 10−6 | −0.30 | 0.766 |
| TNCRE | 1.67 × 10−5 | 3.15 × 10−6 | 5.30 | 0.000 |
| VAPI | 3.23 × 10−5 | 2.78 × 10−5 | 1.16 | 0.245 |
| PCDIUH | −2.50 × 10−6 | 1.40 × 10−6 | −1.78 | 0.075 |
| ARH | −8.80 × 10−3 | 8.00 × 10−4 | −10.41 | 0.000 |
| PRE | 1.00 × 10−4 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 0.000 |
| SH | 4.94 × 10−7 | 3.11 × 10−6 | 0.16 | 0.874 |
| TWR | −5.18 × 10−5 | 6.89 × 10−6 | −7.52 | 0.000 |
| _cons | 0.57 | 0.05 | 10.48 | 0.000 |
| R-squared | 0.6629 | |||
| F-statistic | 727.83 | |||
GMM regression analysis.
| Variable | Coef. | Std.Error | t-Statistic | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIU | 5.19 × 10−6 | 9.04 × 10−6 | 0.570 | 0.566 |
| NEPPI | 1.12 × 10−4 | 0.00 | 3.910 | 0.000 |
| TSAFC | −4.43 × 10−6 | 4.18 × 10−6 | −1.060 | 0.289 |
| TNCRE | 1.53 × 10−5 | 3.18 × 10−6 | 4.800 | 0.000 |
| VAPI | 3.93 × 10−5 | 2.21 × 10−5 | 1.780 | 0.075 |
| PCDIUH | −1.88 × 10−6 | 1.23 × 10−6 | −1.520 | 0.128 |
| ARH | −8.90 × 10−3 | 1.04 × 10−3 | −8.550 | 0.000 |
| PRE | 1.00 × 10−4 | 0.00 | 4.960 | 0.000 |
| SH | 5.81 × 10−7 | 1.14 × 10−6 | 0.510 | 0.611 |
| TWR | −1.00 × 10−4 | 6.39 × 10−6 | −8.280 | 0.000 |
| _cons | 0.56 | 0.06 | 9.590 | 0.000 |
| R-squared | 0.6743 | |||
| F-statistic | 423.53 | |||
Results of the weak instrumental variable test.
| Variable | R-Squared | Adjusted | Robust | Prob > F |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEPPI | 0.9145 | 0.9119 | 350.03 | 0.000 |
| TNCRE | 0.7472 | 0.7394 | 96.71 | 0.000 |
| VAPI | 0.9064 | 0.9064 | 317.1 | 0.000 |
Results of the over identification test.
| Over Identification Test | |
|---|---|
| F-statistic | 1.0917 |
| Prob | 0.2961 |
Model indicators of GWR and MGWR.
| Model Indicators | GWR | MGWR |
|---|---|---|
| R2 | 0.788 | 0.916 |
| AIC | 725.466 | 278.836 |
| AICc | 634.428 | 313.321 |
| Obs. | 373 | 373 |
| Effective number of parameters | 73.9981 | 70.378 |
MGWR bandwidth.
| Indicator | MGWR Bandwidth | GWR Bandwidth |
|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 90 | 160 |
| NIU | 193 | 160 |
| NEPPI | 53 | 160 |
| TSAFC | 53 | 160 |
| POP | 53 | 160 |
| TNCRE | 53 | 160 |
| GDPPC | 361 | 160 |
| VAPI | 90 | 160 |
| IAFAHF | 361 | 160 |
| PCDIUH | 361 | 160 |
| AT | 67 | 160 |
| ARH | 53 | 160 |
| PRE | 53 | 160 |
| SH | 161 | 160 |
| TWR | 90 | 160 |
Summary statistics of MGWR parameter estimates.
| Indicator | Mean | STD | Min | Median | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −0.097 | 0.097 | −0.278 | −0.108 | 0.067 |
| NIU | 0.255 | 0.017 | 0.218 | 0.259 | 0.281 |
| NEPPI | −0.197 | 0.574 | −1.226 | 0.155 | 0.328 |
| TSAFC | −0.674 | 0.414 | −1.469 | −0.573 | −0.163 |
| POP | 2.361 | 1.963 | 0.472 | 1.674 | 5.786 |
| TNCRE | 0.134 | 0.559 | −1.618 | 0.073 | 0.449 |
| GDPPC | 0.273 | 0.004 | 0.269 | 0.272 | 0.287 |
| VAPI | −0.606 | 0.190 | −0.915 | −0.609 | −0.338 |
| IAFAHF | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| PCDIUH | −0.117 | 0.005 | −0.121 | −0.119 | −0.100 |
| AT | −0.714 | 1.188 | −3.142 | −0.098 | 0.139 |
| ARH | −0.228 | 0.307 | −0.638 | −0.058 | 0.217 |
| PRE | 0.247 | 0.555 | −0.512 | 0.049 | 1.517 |
| SH | 0.593 | 0.319 | −0.001 | 0.593 | 1.089 |
| TWR | 0.375 | 0.268 | 0.056 | 0.290 | 0.921 |
Figure 3Spatial patterns of coefficients in the MGWR. (a) Number of Internet users, (b) total sown areas of farm crops, (c) population, (d) total number of chain retail enterprises, (e) GDP per capita, (f) value addition of primary industry, (g) investment in fixed assets of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, (h) per capita disposable income of urban households, (i) average relative humidity. (j) precipitation, and (k) total water resources.