Literature DB >> 26282889

A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.

Stephen Burgess1, Dylan S Small2, Simon G Thompson1.   

Abstract

Instrumental variable analysis is an approach for obtaining causal inferences on the effect of an exposure (risk factor) on an outcome from observational data. It has gained in popularity over the past decade with the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables, known as Mendelian randomization. An instrumental variable is associated with the exposure, but not associated with any confounder of the exposure-outcome association, nor is there any causal pathway from the instrumental variable to the outcome other than via the exposure. Under the assumption that a single instrumental variable or a set of instrumental variables for the exposure is available, the causal effect of the exposure on the outcome can be estimated. There are several methods available for instrumental variable estimation; we consider the ratio method, two-stage methods, likelihood-based methods, and semi-parametric methods. Techniques for obtaining statistical inferences and confidence intervals are presented. The statistical properties of estimates from these methods are compared, and practical advice is given about choosing a suitable analysis method. In particular, bias and coverage properties of estimators are considered, especially with weak instruments. Settings particularly relevant to Mendelian randomization are prioritized in the paper, notably the scenario of a continuous exposure and a continuous or binary outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Instrumental variable; Mendelian randomization; causal inference; comparison of methods; finite-sample bias; weak instruments

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26282889      PMCID: PMC5642006          DOI: 10.1177/0962280215597579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  64 in total

1.  Estimation of bias in nongenetic observational studies using "mendelian triangulation".

Authors:  Leonelo E Bautista; Liam Smeeth; Aroon D Hingorani; Juan P Casas
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Re: Estimation of bias in nongenetic observational studies using "Mendelian triangulation" by Bautista et al.

Authors:  Duncan C Thomas; Debbie A Lawlor; John R Thompson
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Studying noncollapsibility of the odds ratio with marginal structural and logistic regression models.

Authors:  Menglan Pang; Jay S Kaufman; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 5.  Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Commentary: Interpretation and sensitivity analysis for the localized average causal effect curve.

Authors:  Dylan S Small
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  An integrated approach to the meta-analysis of genetic association studies using Mendelian randomization.

Authors:  Cosetta Minelli; John R Thompson; Martin D Tobin; Keith R Abrams
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Mendelian randomisation and causal inference in observational epidemiology.

Authors:  Nuala A Sheehan; Vanessa Didelez; Paul R Burton; Martin D Tobin
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Testing for non-linear causal effects using a binary genotype in a Mendelian randomization study: application to alcohol and cardiovascular traits.

Authors:  Richard J Silverwood; Michael V Holmes; Caroline E Dale; Debbie A Lawlor; John C Whittaker; George Davey Smith; David A Leon; Tom Palmer; Brendan J Keating; Luisa Zuccolo; Juan P Casas; Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  204 in total

1.  Using Mendelian Randomization studies to Assess Causality and Identify New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Jung-Jin Lee; Asif Rasheed; Danish Saleheen
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2016-09-10

2.  Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.

Authors:  Camelia C Minică; Conor V Dolan; Dorret I Boomsma; Eco de Geus; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Mendelian Randomization and the Environmental Epigenetics of Health: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria Grau-Perez; Golareh Agha; Yuanjie Pang; Jose D Bermudez; Maria Tellez-Plaza
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-03

4.  No Association Between Vitamin D Status and Risk of Barrett's Esophagus or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Jing Dong; Puya Gharahkhani; Wong-Ho Chow; Marilie D Gammon; Geoffrey Liu; Carlos Caldas; Anna H Wu; Weimin Ye; Lynn Onstad; Lesley A Anderson; Leslie Bernstein; Paul D Pharoah; Harvey A Risch; Douglas A Corley; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Prasad G Iyer; Brian J Reid; Jesper Lagergren; Nicholas J Shaheen; Thomas L Vaughan; Stuart MacGregor; Sharon Love; Claire Palles; Ian Tomlinson; Ines Gockel; Andrea May; Christian Gerges; Mario Anders; Anne C Böhmer; Jessica Becker; Nicole Kreuser; Rene Thieme; Tania Noder; Marino Venerito; Lothar Veits; Thomas Schmidt; Claudia Schmidt; Jakob R Izbicki; Arnulf H Hölscher; Hauke Lang; Dietmar Lorenz; Brigitte Schumacher; Rupert Mayershofer; Yogesh Vashist; Katja Ott; Michael Vieth; Josef Weismüller; Markus M Nöthen; Susanne Moebus; Michael Knapp; Wilbert H M Peters; Horst Neuhaus; Thomas Rösch; Christian Ell; Janusz Jankowski; Johannes Schumacher; Rachel E Neale; David C Whiteman; Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Taller height as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism: a Mendelian randomization meta-analysis.

Authors:  N S Roetker; S M Armasu; J S Pankow; P L Lutsey; W Tang; M A Rosenberg; T M Palmer; R F MacLehose; S R Heckbert; M Cushman; M de Andrade; A R Folsom
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Effectiveness of a computerized motivational intervention on treatment initiation and substance use: Results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Lerch; Scott T Walters; Liansheng Tang; Faye S Taxman
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-07-06

7.  Conducting a Reproducible Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using the R Analytic Statistical Environment.

Authors:  Danielle Rasooly; Chirag J Patel
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2019-01-15

8.  Associations of obesity and circulating insulin and glucose with breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Shu; Lang Wu; Nikhil K Khankari; Xiao-Ou Shu; Thomas J Wang; Kyriaki Michailidou; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Joe Dennis; Roger L Milne; Marjanka K Schmidt; Paul D P Pharoah; Irene L Andrulis; David J Hunter; Jacques Simard; Douglas F Easton; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Associations of Circulating Protein Levels With Lipid Fractions in the General Population.

Authors:  Sylwia M Figarska; Stefan Gustafsson; Johan Sundström; Johan Ärnlöv; Anders Mälarstig; Sölve Elmståhl; Tove Fall; Lars Lind; Erik Ingelsson
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  Elevated Platelet Count Appears to Be Causally Associated with Increased Risk of Lung Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Yongyue Wei; Ruyang Zhang; Xuesi Dong; Sipeng Shen; Yang Zhao; Jianling Bai; Demetrius Albanes; Neil E Caporaso; Maria Teresa Landi; Bin Zhu; Stephen J Chanock; Fangyi Gu; Stephen Lam; Ming-Sound Tsao; Frances A Shepherd; Adonina Tardon; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Guillermo Fernandez-Tardon; Chu Chen; Matthew J Barnett; Jennifer Doherty; Stig E Bojesen; Mattias Johansson; Paul Brennan; James D McKay; Robert Carreras-Torres; Thomas Muley; Angela Risch; Heunz-Erich Wichmann; Heike Bickeboeller; Albert Rosenberger; Gad Rennert; Walid Saliba; Susanne M Arnold; John K Field; Michael P A Davies; Michael W Marcus; Xifeng Wu; Yuanqing Ye; Loic Le Marchand; Lynne R Wilkens; Olle Melander; Jonas Manjer; Hans Brunnström; Rayjean J Hung; Geoffrey Liu; Yonathan Brhane; Linda Kachuri; Angeline S Andrew; Eric J Duell; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Erik Hfm van der Heijden; Aage Haugen; Shanbeh Zienolddiny; Vidar Skaug; Kjell Grankvist; Mikael Johansson; Penella J Woll; Angela Cox; Fiona Taylor; Dawn M Teare; Philip Lazarus; Matthew B Schabath; Melinda C Aldrich; Richard S Houlston; John McLaughlin; Victoria L Stevens; Hongbing Shen; Zhibin Hu; Juncheng Dai; Christopher I Amos; Younghun Han; Dakai Zhu; Gary E Goodman; Feng Chen; David C Christiani
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.