| Literature DB >> 34831683 |
Noelia Durán-Gómez1, Jorge Guerrero-Martín1, Demetrio Pérez-Civantos2, Casimiro Fermín López-Jurado1, Jesús Montanero-Fernández3, Macarena C Cáceres1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shift working is associated with a profound desynchronization of circadian rhythm and in particular, night-shift work disrupts normal circadian physiology. Sleep deprivation affects the functioning of certain brain areas and thus impairs cognitive performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the night shift on cognitive performance and cerebral oxygenation/haemodynamics.Entities:
Keywords: anxiety; cerebral blood flow; cognitive; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; near-infrared spectroscopy; night; nurses; performance; shift; sleep
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34831683 PMCID: PMC8623720 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211930
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Sociodemographic data and characteristics of the sample.
| Variable | Categories | N (%) | M ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Males | 11 (14.9) | 38.3 ± 6.0 |
| Marital status | Married | 43 (58.1) | |
| Childcare or elderly | Yes | 53 (71.6) | |
| Relaxation | Yes | 38 (51.4) | |
| Type | Sport | 22 (29.7) | |
| Smokes | Yes | 20 (27.0) | |
| Coffee | Yes | 57 (77.0) | |
| Management | Yes | 25 (33.8) | |
| Time worked in ICU | 11.1 ± 8.3 | ||
| Total time worked | 17.4 ± 7.8 | ||
| Availability of enough time to perform job in one shift | Yes | 47 (63.5) | |
| Future prospect of continuing in the unit | Yes | 42 (56.8) | |
| Intention to leave or change ICU | Yes | 30 (40.5) | |
| Number of hours of sleep during night shift | 0 | 49 (66.2) | |
| Number of night shifts per month | 4 | 10 (13.5) |
Abbreviations: M, mean; SD, standard deviation.
Relationship between number of hours of sleep and the main variables measured in NS condition.
| NS Condition | Nº Hours Asleep during Night Shift | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (N = 49) | 1 (N = 17) | 2 (N = 8) | ||
| M ± S.D. | M ± S.D. | M ± S.D. * | ANOVA | |
| STAI score | 17.51 a * ± 9.19 | 15.82 a ± 10.01 | 29.00 b ± 6.23 | |
| VFT | 45.96 a ± 9.00 | 44.47 a ± 10.03 | 36.50 b ± 4.72 | |
| Average rSO2-NS Left side | 65.87 a ± 8.01 | 63.13 a ± 3.19 | 70.87 b ± 4.84 | |
| Average rSO2-NS Right side | 67.58 a ± 9.16 | 64.10 a ± 3.65 | 73.17 b ± 4.40 | |
| CBlpb | 36.63 a ± 15.00 | 42.11 a,b ± 21.34 | 55.70 b ± 14.25 | |
| CBIwb | 39.49 a ± 14.94 | 43.06 a ± 13.90 | 47.75 a ± 17.71 | |
| CBIcb | 28.13 a ± 15.30 | 31.35 a ± 16.92 | 50.00 b ± 12.20 | |
Abbreviations: M, mean; SD, standard deviation. * a,b in table indicate that there is a significant difference between the two groups according to Tukey’s method only if they do not have any letters in common.
Evolution of rSO2 measures.
| Measures (N = 66) | Left Side | Right Side | Both Sides | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ± S.D. a | Correlation b | M ± S.D. a | Correlation b | R-L: M ± S.D. c | Correlation d | |
| rSO2-NR1 | 62.64 ± 7.18 | - | 63.94 ± 8.02 | - | 1.30 ± 4.95, | r = 0.802, |
| rSO2-NR2 | 66.36 ± 7.25, | r = 0.928, | 67.92 ± 8.32, | r = 0.928, | 1.56 ± 4.42, | r = 0.847, |
| rSO2-NR3 | 66.50 ± 7.88, | r = 0.918, | 68.18 ± 9.18, | r = 0.894, | 1.68 ± 4.84, | r = 0.849, |
| rSO2-NS1 | 59.08 ± 7.96, | r = 0.603, | 62.15 ± 9.04, | r = 0.693, | 3.08 ± 8.01, | r = 0.553, |
| rSO2-NS2 | 62.03 ± 7.97, | r = 0.929, | 64.00 ± 9.28, | r = 0.959, | 1.97 ± 8.21, | r = 0.555, |
| rSO2-NS3 | 61.76 ± 8.77, | r = 0.946, | 64.45 ± 9.86, | r = 0.958, | 2.70 ± 8.97, | r = 0.542, |
| M rSO2-NR | 65.17 ± 7.17 | - | 66.68 ± 8.22 | - | 1.52 ± 4.21, | r = 0.859, |
| M rSO2-NS | 60.95 ± 8.01, | r = 0.725, | 63.54 ± 9.24, | r = 0.673, | 2.58 ± 8.16, | r = 0.560, |
Abbreviations: M, mean; SD, standard deviation. a p-value corresponds to mean comparison with previous stage in the same side according to t-paired test. b p-value corresponds to correlation with previous stage in the same side according to Pearson’s correlation test. c p-value corresponds to mean comparison between both sides (right–left) at the same stage according to t-paired test. d p-value corresponds to correlation between both sides at the same stage according to Pearson’s correlation test.
Figure 1Evolution of average rSO2 scores.
Figure 2Relationship between the STAI score in NS condition and decrease rSO2 in the left side.