| Literature DB >> 34828373 |
Tongyu Zhang1, Yu Chen2, Junhui Wen1, Yaxiong Jia3, Liang Wang2, Xueze Lv2, Weifang Yang2, Changqing Qu4, Haiying Li5, Huie Wang6, Lujiang Qu1, Zhonghua Ning1.
Abstract
Molting in birds provides us with an ideal genetic model for understanding aging and rejuvenation since birds present younger characteristics for reproduction and appearance after molting. Forced molting (FM) by fasting in chickens causes aging of their reproductive system and then promotes cell redevelopment by providing water and feed again. To reveal the genetic mechanism of rejuvenation, we detected blood hormone indexes and gene expression levels in the hypothalamus and ovary of hens from five different periods during FM. Three hormones were identified as participating in FM. Furthermore, the variation trends of gene expression levels in the hypothalamus and ovary at five different stages were found to be basically similar using transcriptome analysis. Among them, 45 genes were found to regulate cell aging during fasting stress and 12 genes were found to promote cell development during the recovery period in the hypothalamus. In addition, five hub genes (INO80D, HELZ, AGO4, ROCK2, and RFX7) were identified by WGCNA. FM can restart the reproductive function of aged hens by regulating expression levels of genes associated with aging and development. Our study not only enriches the theoretical basis of FM but also provides insights for the study of antiaging in humans and the conception mechanism in elderly women.Entities:
Keywords: aging; forced molting; hens; rejuvenation; transcriptome analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34828373 PMCID: PMC8621152 DOI: 10.3390/genes12111767
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Feather appearance phenotypes in hens of five different growth periods during FM. Period 1 (A), Period 2 (B), Period 3 (C), Period 4 (D), Period 5 (E).
Description of chicken population information before and after molting in five different sampling periods.
| Period | Days of Age | Egg Production | Numbers of Hens | Egg-Laying Rate | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 224 | 41,460 | 44,079 | 0.941 | first peak of egg production |
| 2 | 456 | 31,180 | 40,228 | 0.774 | preparation period for molting |
| 3 | 469 | 99 | 39,992 | 0.002 | cessation of stress period |
| 4 | 500 | 18,770 | 39,752 | 0.472 | recovery period of molting |
| 5 | 527 | 34,630 | 39,677 | 0.873 | second peak of egg production |
Figure 2Transcriptome analysis of hypothalamus and ovary in 5 periods during FM. Overall profiles of mRNA expression in the hypothalamus (A) and ovary (B). DEGs between any two different periods in the hypothalamus (C) and ovary (D). Venn diagram shows the DEGs from the 1-vs-2, 2-vs-3, and 3-vs-5 comparisons in the hypothalamus (E) and ovary (F).
Figure 3The KEGG pathways of three groups of DEGs in hypothalamus and ovary during FM. Significant KEGG pathways of DEGs (p < 0.05) from the comparison of Ⅰ vs. Ⅱ, Ⅱ vs. Ⅲ, and Ⅲ vs. Ⅴ in the hypothalamus (A) and ovary (B).
Figure 4All the DEGs in the hypothalamus and ovary of the 3 groups were analyzed by Short Time-Series Expression Miner (STEM). STEM clustering of the numbers of DEGs at 19 profiles in the hypothalamus (A). The number on the top right corner represents the cardinality of each cluster, and the number on the bottom left represents the adjusted p-value; all significant profiles based on p values of the numbers of genes (B). Expression patterns of profiles 1 (C) and 13 (D). GO analysis (BP, CC, and MF) and KEGG pathways of genes clustered in profiles 1 (E) and 13 (F).
Figure 5The data of all genes expressed in the hypothalamus and ovary in 5 periods were analyzed by WGCNA. Gene dendrogram obtained based on a dissimilarity measure (1-TOM) (A). Relationships of module eigengenes vs. period and tissue (B). Scatterplots of gene significance (GS) vs. module membership (MM) in the brown module (C). Visualization of modules: the hub genes in the modules are highlighted in red and yellow (D).