| Literature DB >> 31480206 |
Gi Ppeum Han1, Kyu-Chan Lee2, Hwan Ku Kang3, Han Na Oh2, Woo Jun Sul2, Dong Yong Kil1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As laying hens become aged, laying performance and egg quality are generally impaired. One of the practical methods to rejuvenate production and egg quality of aged laying hens with decreasing productivity is a forced molting. However, the changes in intestinal microbiota after forced molting of aged hens are not clearly known. The aim of the present study was to analyze the changes in excreta bacterial communities after forced molting of aged laying hens.Entities:
Keywords: Aged Laying Hen; Excreta Bacterial Community; Forced Molting; High-throughput 16S rRNA Sequencing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31480206 PMCID: PMC6817773 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.19.0180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Relative abundance [1] of top 9 bacterial taxa in the excreta between pre-molting and immediate post-molting hens
| Group | Phylum (%) | Class (%) | Order (%) | Family (%) | Genus (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-molting | Bacteroidetes (9.51±6.0) | Bacteroidia (9.44±6.0) | Bacteroidales (9.44±6.0) | Bacteroidaceae (3.97±2.5) | |
| Prevotellaceae (1.18±0.7) | |||||
| Unclassified (1.39±0.9) | Unclassified (1.39±0.9) | ||||
| Firmicutes (84.96±6.9) | Bacilli (68.60±8.1) | Lactobacillales (66.89±8.2) | Enterococcaceae (4.10±2.1) | ||
| Lactobacillaceae (62.32±8.3) | |||||
| Turicibacterales (1.63±0.5) | Turicibacteraceae (1.63±0.5) | ||||
| Clostridia (15.93±4.2) | Clostridiales (15.93±4.2) | Clostridiaceae (3.61±1.8) | |||
| Peptostreptococcaceae (7.49±3.7) | Unclassified (7.30±3.7) | ||||
| Proteobacteria (3.90±3.3) | Gammaproteobacteria (3.57±3.3) | Pseudomanadales (3.46±3.3) | Moraxellaceae (3.44±3.3) | ||
| Post-molting | Bacteroidetes (12.81±5.8) | Bacteroidia (12.72±5.8) | Bacteroidales (12.72±5.8) | Bacteroidaceae (5.48±2.6) | |
| Paraprevotellaceae (2.47±1.2) | Unclassified (2.30±1.1) | ||||
| Firmicutes (75.17±7.2) | Bacilli (53.20±7.9) | Lactobacillales (49.53±7.7) | Enterococcaceae (22.26±5.9) | ||
| Lactobacillaceae (25.00±6.0) | |||||
| Turicibacterales (3.50±0.7) | Turicibacteraceae (3.50±0.7) | ||||
| Clostridia (21.41±3.2) | Clostridiales (21.41±3.2) | Clostridiaceae (4.60±1.4) | |||
| Lachnospiraceae (4.20±1.4) | |||||
| Peptostreptococcaceae (5.88±1.8) | Unclassified (5.36±1.6) | ||||
| Proteobacteria (11.3±4.4) | Gammaproteobacteria (11.12±4.4) | Enterobacteriales (10.85±4.4) | Enterobacteriaceae (10.85±4.4) |
Relative abundance indicated as mean percentages±standard error (SE).
Figure 1Phylogenetic trees constructed using the neighbor-joining method based on the nucleotide sequences of 14 pathogens. Operational taxonomic units sequences were assigned to (a) Enterococcus cecorum and (b) Escherichia coli. The phylogenetic tree was constructed from MEGA 7.0.
Figure 2Alpha diversity: Choa1, PD whole tree, observed operational taxonomic units, and simpson indices in the excreta of pre-molting and immediate post-molting hens. For all 4 indices, higher values correspond to greater diversity. p-values were estimated by Wilcoxon test, indicating * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Figure 3Jaccard distance based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of pre-molting and immediate post-molting. The divergence of forced molting on excreta bacterial community was statistically tested by analysis of similarity (ANOSIM; permutations = 999; ANOSIM’s r = 0.236, p<0.001). Percentages on the axes indicate variation explained by the principal coordinates of the jaccard distance and each symbol represents the bacterial community of each individual hen. Standard error ellipses represent 75% confidence areas.
Figure 4Heat map and logarithmic linear discriminant analysis scores of the differentially abundant bacteria between pre-molting and immediate-post molting hens determined by LEfSe analysis (α<0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). LEfSe, linear discriminant analysis effect size.
Excreta bacterial community differences between pre-molting and immediate post-molting hens using linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe)
| Group | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Species | LDA score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-molting | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | 5.16 | ||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | 4.16 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Enterococcaceae | 3.68 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | 3.29 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | 3.25 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | 3.14 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | 3.11 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | 3.10 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | 3.01 | |||
| Post-molting | Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Paraprevotellaceae | 3.74 | ||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Bacteroidaceae | 3.61 | |||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Prevotellaceae | 3.55 | |||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Paraprevotellaceae | 3.47 | |||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Bacteroidaceae | 3.39 | |||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | S24_7 | 3.39 | |||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Porphyromonadaceae | 3.30 | |||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Porphyromonadaceae | 3.16 | |||
| Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Bacteroidaceae | 3.05 | |||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | 3.96 | |||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Clostridiaceae | 3.71 | |||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | 3.49 | |||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Veillonellaceae | 3.44 | |||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | 3.42 | |||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | 3.34 | |||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | 3.17 | |||
| Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | 3.16 | |||
| Firmicutes | Erysipelotrichi | Erysipelotrichales | Erysipelotrichaceae | 3.14 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Enterococcaceae | 4.98 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Leuconostocaceae | 3.74 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | 3.68 | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Turicibacterales | Turicibacteraceae | 3.96 | |||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | 4.73 |
Logarithmic linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores of each discriminant bacterium (LDA>3.0).