Yiyun Liu1, Qianqian Lan1, Tong Sun1, Chuhao Tang1, Tingting Yang1, Hongyu Duan1, Rongjun Liu1, Hong Qi2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, 49 North Garden Road, BeijingBeijing, 100191, China. doctorqihong@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate binocular visual function after unilateral and bilateral implantation of segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs). METHODS: This prospective comparative pilot study included patients who underwent SBL-3 (Lenstec; + 3.00 D) implantation at Peking University Third Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups (monocular or binocular surgery). Thirty-two patients with emmetropic presbyopic contralateral eyes and 49 patients with bilateral SBL-3 implantation within a week between eyes were included in the unilateral SBL-3 and bilateral groups, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, the main outcomes were binocular uncorrected distant, intermediate, and near visual acuity (UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA). Secondary outcomes included binocular best-corrected visual acuity at all distances, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena, spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) score. The essential perceptual phenomena constituting binocular vision, simultaneous perception, fusion, and stereopsis were also evaluated. RESULTS: Both groups showed similar binocular UDVA and UIVA, but UNVA was significantly better in the bilateral group (0.07 ± 0.07 versus 0.12 ± 0.07, P = 0.008). Better binocular defocus curve at intermediate to near focal points, higher percentage of spectacle independence at near distance, and NEI-VFQ-25 near activity scores were observed in the bilateral group. No significant differences in contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena, overall satisfaction, other NEI-VFQ-25 subscales, fusional amplitude, and stereoacuity were found between groups. CONCLUSION: Unilateral implantation of segmented refractive MIOL provided desirable distant visual acuity and high patient satisfaction, but inferior intermediate and near visual outcomes compared with bilateral implantation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate binocular visual function after unilateral and bilateral implantation of segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs). METHODS: This prospective comparative pilot study included patients who underwent SBL-3 (Lenstec; + 3.00 D) implantation at Peking University Third Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups (monocular or binocular surgery). Thirty-two patients with emmetropic presbyopic contralateral eyes and 49 patients with bilateral SBL-3 implantation within a week between eyes were included in the unilateral SBL-3 and bilateral groups, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, the main outcomes were binocular uncorrected distant, intermediate, and near visual acuity (UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA). Secondary outcomes included binocular best-corrected visual acuity at all distances, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena, spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) score. The essential perceptual phenomena constituting binocular vision, simultaneous perception, fusion, and stereopsis were also evaluated. RESULTS: Both groups showed similar binocular UDVA and UIVA, but UNVA was significantly better in the bilateral group (0.07 ± 0.07 versus 0.12 ± 0.07, P = 0.008). Better binocular defocus curve at intermediate to near focal points, higher percentage of spectacle independence at near distance, and NEI-VFQ-25 near activity scores were observed in the bilateral group. No significant differences in contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena, overall satisfaction, other NEI-VFQ-25 subscales, fusional amplitude, and stereoacuity were found between groups. CONCLUSION: Unilateral implantation of segmented refractive MIOL provided desirable distant visual acuity and high patient satisfaction, but inferior intermediate and near visual outcomes compared with bilateral implantation.
Authors: Deric W de Wit; Jose Diaz; Tara C B Moore; Salissou Moutari; Jonathan E Moore Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Javier L Fernández-García; Andrea Llovet-Rausell; Julio Ortega-Usobiaga; Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig; Fernando Llovet-Osuna; Vasyl Druchkiv; Alfonso Arias-Puente Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Brien A Holden; Timothy R Fricke; S May Ho; Reg Wong; Gerhard Schlenther; Sonja Cronjé; Anthea Burnett; Eric Papas; Kovin S Naidoo; Kevin D Frick Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2008-12
Authors: Seth R Flaxman; Rupert R A Bourne; Serge Resnikoff; Peter Ackland; Tasanee Braithwaite; Maria V Cicinelli; Aditi Das; Jost B Jonas; Jill Keeffe; John H Kempen; Janet Leasher; Hans Limburg; Kovin Naidoo; Konrad Pesudovs; Alex Silvester; Gretchen A Stevens; Nina Tahhan; Tien Y Wong; Hugh R Taylor Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 26.763