Literature DB >> 33039375

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Refractive Lens Exchange With a Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Emmetropic Presbyopic Patients.

Javier L Fernández-García1, Andrea Llovet-Rausell2, Julio Ortega-Usobiaga3, Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig4, Fernando Llovet-Osuna4, Vasyl Druchkiv5, Alfonso Arias-Puente6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes and patient satisfaction between unilateral and bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in emmetropic patients with presbyopia.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series.
METHODS: This is a multicenter, multisurgeon study of emmetropic presbyopes who underwent refractive lens exchange (RLE) followed by an implantation of FineVision IOL (PhysIOL). Inclusion criteria were emmetropic eyes, with a sphere between -0.25 and +0.50 diopters (D), cylinder of less than 0.75 D and spherical equivalent (SE) between -0.25 and +0.25 D. In addition, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) had to be Snellen >0.9 in each eye. A total of 171 eyes of 122 patients were evaluated. This sample was divided into 2 groups depending on whether they have been operated monocularly or binocularly. Visual and refractive performance, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence were evaluated.
RESULTS: UDVA and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) remained almost unchanged after monocular and binocular surgery. Binocular uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) were better in those operated binocularly (0.3±0.12 vs 0.22±0.06, P < .063, and 0.09±0.08 vs 0.04±0.05, P < .027, respectively). Predictability and efficacy were higher in the binocular group, whereas safety was better in the monocular group. Visual dysphotopsia was worse and spectacle independence for all distances was higher in binocular group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our research shows that RLE with binocular implantation of a trifocal diffractive IOL in presbyopic emmetropic patients is more successful in UNVA than monocular implantation. However, no significant differences were observed in UDVA, UIVA, and patient satisfaction.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33039375     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  5 in total

1.  Binocular visual function after unilateral versus bilateral implantation of segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yiyun Liu; Qianqian Lan; Tong Sun; Chuhao Tang; Tingting Yang; Hongyu Duan; Rongjun Liu; Hong Qi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  SMILE for the Treatment of Residual Refractive Error After Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Faruk Semiz; Anita Syla Lokaj; Njomza Hima Musa; Ceren Ece Semiz; Zekeriya Alp Demirsoy; Olcay Semiz
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-05-28

3.  Exploration of the Visual Function after the Implantation of Continuous Visual Range Human Cocrystal Micromonocular Vision in Both Eyes of the Patient.

Authors:  Fangrong Cai; Xiaoli Wang; Zhihui Deng; Lina Bai
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Visual performance, safety and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic patients without cataract.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández; José F Alfonso Sánchez; Mark Nieradzik; Beatriz Valcárcel; Noemí Burguera; Alexander Kapp
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Partial monovision achieved by unilateral implantation of a multifocal add-on lens with bilateral pseudophakia: evaluation and results.

Authors:  Vitus André Knecht; Horaţiu Alexandru Colosi; Andrea Hassenstein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.535

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.