Literature DB >> 34824623

Factors associated with unmet supportive care needs of oncology patients at Dessie Referral Hospital, 2020.

Husniya Yasin Amane1, Asressie Molla Tessema1, Kemal Ahmed Seid1, Anissa Mohammed Hassen1, Hussien Endris Assen2, Zinet Abegaz Asfaw1, Salih Mohamed Endrie3, Foziya Mohammed Hussien1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of supportive care needs for cancer patients and identifying factors affecting these needs is important for the implementation of supportive care programmes, as the burden of cancer is increasing in Ethiopia.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and associated factors of unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients at Dessie Referral Hospital, Dessie, South Wollo, North East Ethiopia, 2020.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was implemented among 405 cancer patients from February to 30 July 2020, at Dessie Referral Hospital. The data were collected using a validated supportive care needs survey questionnaire through face to face interview and data extraction tools. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used and bi-variable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to describe the association between dependent and independent variables. Thus, a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULT: From the total 405 participants, 275 (67.5%) were females with a mean age of (mean ± standard deviation) 48.6 ± 15.4 years. Unmet supportive care needs were higher among psychological needs (81.0%, 95% (confidence interval) CI = 77.0-84.9) and physical needs (74.6%, 95% CI = 70.1-79.0). Old age was associated with unmet physical and psychological needs domain than young age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06), (AOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.09), respectively. High household income was significantly associated with health information needs (AOR = 2.22; 95% CI: 1.33-13.93), remission status (AOR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.62) was associated with patient/supportive care needs, late stage cancer was also significantly associated with physical, psychological and health information needs of patients (AOR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.18-4.06), (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.18-4.57) and (AOR = 2:95%; CI: 1.03-3.86), respectively. Besides, source of information had a statistically significant association with psychological, health information and patient care needs domain (AOR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.15-5.93), (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.65-5.82) and (AOR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.25-3.87), respectively. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: This study shows that the prevalence of unmet supportive care needs in cancer patients is high in each domain. Age, income, cancer stage, cancer site, treatment option, time since diagnosis and sources of information were associated across one or more unmet supportive care needs domains. Therefore, the government and health professionals should work together to improve the unmet needs of cancer patients. © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dessie; oncology; supportive care; unmet need

Year:  2021        PMID: 34824623      PMCID: PMC8580717          DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience        ISSN: 1754-6605


Introduction

In the past few decades, most countries have experienced a health transition that resulted in a dramatic shift in the disease burden from communicable and nutrition-related diseases to non-communicable diseases [1]. Among the global deaths in 2018, 63% were attributed to non-communicable diseases, and the toll is expected to increase further with the ageing of the population, urbanisation and globalisation of risk factors [2]. The global burden of cancer statistics has estimated 7.7 billion new cancer cases and 9.9 billion deaths in 2020 [3]. From the whole cancer data, Europe accounts for 23.4% of the global cancer cases and 20.3% of the cancer deaths, but it has only 9.0% of the worldwide population. On the other hand, the Americas have 13.3% of the global population and account for 21.0% of incidence and 14.4% of mortality worldwide. In contrast to other world regions, the proportions of cancer deaths in Asia and Africa are 57.3% and 7.3%, respectively [2]. In Ethiopia, cancer is the second top non-communicable disease next to cardiovascular disorders and its burden is aggravated by lack of early detection and timely treatment [4, 5]. The supportive care need is a broad term covering psychological, health system, physical or daily living, patient care or support, and sexuality needs [6]. Due to the disease’s progressive nature, supportive care is more important for cancer patients compared with patients with other non-communicable diseases. Various studies have shown that early initiation of supportive care significantly improves the survival and quality of life of cancer patients [7]. ‘Unmet needs’ roughly represents the deficiencies in every area of patients’ lives, that arises due to having to deal with a diagnosis of a cancer diagnosis, which lack the level of service or support an individual perceives is necessary to achieve optimal well-being [8]. These needs can develop at any stage in the disease course, from diagnosis to the completion of treatment or death. Assessing the unmet supportive care need of cancer patients has a lot of advantages for both the patient and the government. It helps to prioritise the service to allocate resources depending on the urgency of the need and identify patient subgroups with higher-level needs for prevention or at least reduce problems through appropriate early intervention [9, 10]. According to different research conducted at general cancer population, 27%–60.2% of patients had a low to a high level of unmet supportive care needs [11-13]. Similarly, a study done in the United Kingdom stated that one-quarter of the patients reported unmet supportive care needs [14]. According to a survey done in Africa, nearly 46% of the participants indicated supportive care unmet needs [15]. Unmet needs have been categorised into these major domains: physical, psychological, informational, patient care and sexual needs [16]. Different researchers have found that the largest unmet needs are related to the psychological needs domain [17-19], and in much lesser frequency is found in patient care and sexual domains [20, 21]. A systematic review in Asia and Africa showed that psychological, physical and healthcare service/information domains were the three most commonly reported domains of unmet needs for cancer patients [15, 18]. A study conducted at the university of Gondar revealed that the overall mean score level of unmet need was 3.49, with health system and information need being the highest unmet needs [22]. The unmet needs of cancer patients and the level of satisfaction with the overall care were found to influence health related quality of life. Therefore, addressing the unmet needs of cancer patients and ensuring a higher satisfaction rate are recommended to maintain adequate health-related quality of life [23]. Predictors of unmet supportive care needs include younger age, advanced disease, lengthy cancer experience and anticancer treatments. Patients suffer from various problems, such as physical, psychological, emotional and practical issues [24]. Currently, the Ethiopian government has made efforts to prevent, control and manage cancer by implementing the Ethiopian National Cancer Control Plan in 2015 for the period of 2016–2020. In addition, the Ministry of Health set up five specialised cancer treatment centres in Gondar, Hawassa, Jimma, Tigray and Southern Nation and Nationality. However, the supportive care of cancer patients has not been considered a health priority and little is known about the supportive care need of oncology patients [25, 26]. Besides there has been only one study conducted in Ethiopia [22]; therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence and associated factors of unmet supportive care needs of oncology patients at Dessie referral Hospital (DRH) in the only oncology Centre in North East Ethiopia.

Methods

Study design and setting

An institution-based cross-sectional study design was implemented on all cancer patients seen at DRH, Dessie, South Wollo Zone, Ethiopia from February to April 2020. DRH is one of the referral hospitals in the Amhara region with about 9 million catchment populations who came from more than 200 km away and is used as a teaching hospital for health science students. According to the Centre’s cancer registry, the hospital oncology centre started chemotherapy treatment for cancer patients in December 2018 and treated approximately 160 cancer patients per month.

Data collection procedure and participants

The study populations were all patients diagnosed with cancer on any form of treatment for their disease at Dessie Referral Hospital. Patients who were severely ill and unable to communicate during the data collection period were excluded. Psychological needs, health information needs, physical or daily living, patient care and sexuality needs were the dependent variables. In contrast, socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, educational status, marital status, employment status, residences, income, health insurances), information related factors (sources of information and informational status) and clinical variables (type of cancer, type of treatment, stage of cancer, time since diagnosis, recurrence history of chronic illness, remission status) were independent variables. Those cancer patients who came for any type of treatment related to cancer during the data collection period were interviewed using a structured questionnaire adapted from different literatures and supportive care needs survey (SCNS) validated tool (See Appendix 1). The questions include the socio-demographic characteristics, informational status, clinical characteristics and patient’s supportive health care needs. Informational status was assessed as a total score composed of 10 different questions, which are basic information received on their diagnosis, prognosis, treatment is taken, medication benefit and side effects, duration of medication, a sequence of treatment, medical and tests a patient undergo the value might range from 0 to 10 maximum response [27, 28]. Data regarding patient’s clinical related factors were extracted from a patient card using a chart extraction checklist. The original SCNS-short form (SF) 34 assesses cancer-specific perceived needs across five domains: Physical and daily living needs, psychological needs, health system information-needs, patient care and support needs and sexuality-needs. The participants were asked to indicate the level of their needs for the last month based on a 5-point Likert scale, The SCNS-SF has been validated at Hawassa referral hospital consisting of 25 items, which had overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.933, ranging from 0.755 to 0.994 for the five domains [29]. For each item, participants could choose either ‘not applicable’ or ‘satisfied’ under the heading ‘no need’, or ‘low’, ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ need under the heading ‘some need’. The data were collected by two BSc nurses working at DRH other than the oncology unit. The quality of data was maintained by giving training to data collectors about the questionnaire’s content, collecting data, study design, the significance of the study and the ethics of the research. Continuous monitoring and supervision were conducted by the principal investigator every day for completeness of the data. The questionnaire was translated to Amharic and then translated back to English for consistency. Besides, before the actual data were collected, a pre-test was conducted on 5% of the sample size for clarity and applicability of the tool, and feedback about the questionnaire.

Data analysis procedure

The data were entered and coded into EpiData 4.2 software then exported to SPSS V26 software for analysis. Descriptive statistics and numerical summary measures were presented using frequencies distribution tables and graphs to describe the study population about relevant variables. For continuous variables, we use mean and median if the distribution is normal and skewed, respectively. The outcome variable, supportive health care needs, was recoded into ‘no needs’ and ‘some needs’. If a patient is reported as having at least one low to high need in a domain considered ‘unmet needs’ in that specific domain, and if a patient reports no need in all items to a single domain, it is considered as ‘no needs’ [30]. Bivariable logistic regression analysis with the help of odds ratio (OR) along with their 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the degree of association between dependent and independent variables and variables whose (p < 0.25) was a candidate for multivariable logistic regression. Four independent models for each of the SCNS 25 domains were used to determine the association between independent variables and each of the domains (psychological, physical or daily living, health system, supportive needs domain). The statistical significance level was declared at a p-value < 0.05.

Ethical consideration

This study was approved by the research and ethical committee of Wollo University College of Medicine and Health Science. Informed written consent was also secured from every study participant before the start of the study after telling them about the study’s objective. To ensure the confidentiality of the study participant’s information, anonymous typing was applied. So, the name of the participant and any identification of participants were not written on the questionnaire. All interviews were taken in a place that keeps privacy, and respondents chose the interview time.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants

Out of 423 cancer patients seen at DRH during the data collection period, a total of 405 cancer patients aged 18 years or older were enrolled in the study giving a response rate of 95.7%. Of which 275 (67.9%) were females, and 268 (66.2%) were married. The mean age was 48.6 years (standard deviation (SD): 15.4) with a minimum of 18 and a maximum of 92 years. Two hundred eleven (52.1%) were unable to read and write, and 218 (53.8%) were jobless. More than half (54.1%) were from an urban area and 233 (57.3%) had health insurances coverage for their medical expenses. More than one third of diagnosed cancer cases were breast cancer cases accounting for 138 (34.1%), followed by cervical cancer cases 77 (19.0%). Chemotherapy was found to be the leading treatment given for cancer patients accounting for 59.3%. Three hundred five (75.30%) were late-stage cancer cases. Eighty-nine (22%) had a history of remission, and 316 (99%) had recurrences. Furthermore, eighty-nine (22%) participants had a history of co-existing disease (Table 1).
Table 1.

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristic of oncology patients at Dessie Referral Hospital, Dessie, Ethiopia, 2020.

VariablesCategoryNumber of participants n (%)
Mean age (±SD)48.6 ± 15.4
Sex of the patientMale130 (32.1)
Female275 (67.9)
Educational statusUnable to read and write211 (52.1)
Primary education97 (24.0)
Secondary education46 (11.4)
College and above51 (12.6)
Occupational statusEmployed54 (13.3)
Merchant119 (29.4)
Jobless/housewife218 (53.8)
Retired14 (3.5)
Marital statusSingleMarriedDivorcedWidowed41 (10.1)268 (66.2)34 (8.4)62 (15.3)
ResidenceRuralUrban186 (45.9)219 (54.1)
Health insuranceYes233 (57.5)
No172 (42.5)
Household income≤1,500155 (38.3)
1,501–2,00091 (22.5)
2,001–2,70060 (14.8)
>2,70099 (24.4)
First cancer siteBreast138 (34.1)
Colon39 (9.6)
Prostate36 (8.9)
Lung37 (9.1)
Skin30 (7.4)
Cervical83 (19.0)
Lipoma42 (8.1)
Treatment options of the patientsChemotherapy240 (59.3)
Surgery84 (20.7)
Analgesia81 (20.0)
Stage of cancerStage I14 (3.5)
Stage II86 (21.2)
Stage III162 (40.0)
Stage IV143 (35.3)
Remission of the diseaseYes89 (22.0)
Recurrence of the diseaseYes387 (99.5)
Co-existing diseaseYes89 (22.0)
Median ± IQR, time since diagnosis (months)4.0 ± 10

SD, Standard deviation; IQR, Interquartile range

Information about diagnosis and related factors

Of the total patients, 344 (84.9%) have got information about their diagnosis. Two hundred six (50.9%) were informed about their current status of a disease. More than half 217 (53.6%) and 247 (61%) were informed about their possible cause of the disease and the medical test diagnosis of their disease, respectively. Three hundred sixteen (78%) and 349 (86.2%) were informed about their medical test and medical result, respectively. Three hundred forty-nine (86.2%) patients claimed that they were informed about the medical treatment they have taken, and 287 (70.9%) of patients had information about sequences of treatment they have received. Three hundred four (75.1%) were informed about the expected benefit, duration and possible side effects of the treatment. More than half 249 (59.5%) of patients received information from health professionals, and the rest were from health professionals and self-reading. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of patient informational status was 7 ± 1.6.

The magnitude of the supportive care needs of participants

The most frequent need of patients was from the psychological domain accounting for 81% followed by physical or daily living needs 302 (74.6%). Finally, health system need was the least unmet supportive care need by patients accounting 87 (21.5%) (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Magnitude of unsupportive care needs of an oncological patient, at Dessie Referral Hospital, Dessie, Ethiopia, 2020.

Factors associated with physical/daily living need domain

Binary and multivariable logistic regression analysis had been performed to assess the association between the dependent variable (physical needs domain) and independent variables by controlling the confounding variables. In the binary logistic regression, age, occupational status, marital status, health insurances, household income, cancer site, cancer stage, treatment option, recurrences of diseases and coexisting diseases and informational status were significantly associated with the physical domain; hence further explored in the multivariable logistic analysis. As a result, age, cancer site, treatment option and stage of cancer become important predictors of physical need (p < 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2.

Binary and multivariable logistic regression of variables associated with physical need domain among oncology patients at DRH, Dessie, Ethiopia, 2020.

VariablesPhysical need domain
No needSome needCOR (CI)AOR (CI)p value
Age 1.04 (1.01–1.05)1.03 (1.01–1.06)<0.001a
Occupational status
Employed15 (14.6)39 (12.9)11
Paid work32 (31.1)87 (28.8)1.04 (0.51–2.15)1.33 (0.56–3.18)0.903
Jobless55 (53.4)94 (54.0)1.14 (0.58-2.22)1.67 (0.66–4.3)0.701
Retired1 (1.0)13 (4.3)5.0 (0.6–41.63)2.62 (0.22–30.9)0.137
Marital status
Single12 (11.7)29 (9.6)11
Married76 (73.8)192 (63.6)1.04 (0.51–15)0.75 (0.30–1.87)0.904
Divorced4 (3.9)30 (9.9)3.1 (0.89–10.7)1.75 (0.41–7.51)0.074
Widowed11 (10.7)51 (16.9)1.92 (0.75–4.89)0.92 (0.25–3.34)0.173
Health insurance
Yes69 (67.0)164 (54.3)11
No34 (33.0)138 (45.7)0.58 (0.36–0.93)0.75 (0.43–1.34)0.095
Monthly household income
0–1,50050 (48.5)105 (34.8)11
1,501–2,00022 (21.4)69 (22.8)1.49 (0.83–2.68)1.82 (0.85–3.9)0.18
2,001–2,7009 (8.7)51 (16.9)2.7 (1.23–5.91)2.95 (1.19–7.3)0.013a
>2,70022 (21.4)77 (25.5)1.66 (0.93–2.98)1.92 (0.77–4.8)0.085
Informational status -1.18 (1.03–1.36)1.17 (0.98–1.38)0.074
Cancer site
Breast52 (50.5)86 (28.5)11
Colon10 (9.7)29 (9.6)1.75 (0.79–3.89)1.23 (0.49–3.06)0.167
Prostate3 (2.9)33 (10.9)6.6 (1.94–22.02)9.1 (2.34–35.74)0.003a
Lung2 (1.9)35 (11.6)10.58 (2.44–45.8)8.15 (1.76–37.6)0.002a
Skin7 (6.8)23 (7.6)1.98 (0.79–4.95)1.67 (0.6–4.63)0.141
Cervical18 (17.5)65 (21.5)2.18 (1.16–4.08)2.23 (1.06–4.67)0.014a
Lipoma11 (10.7)31 (10.3)1.7 (0.79–3.67)1.36 (0.54–3.44)0.174
Treatment type
Chemotherapy75 (72.8)165 (54.6)11
Surgery9 (8.7)75 (24.8)3.7 (1.8–7.96)6.92 (2.95–16.2)<0.001a
Analgesia19 (18.4)62 (20.8)1.48 (0.83–2.65)1.28 (0.64–2.57)0.184
Cancer stage
Early stage (I, II)38 (36.9)62 (20.5)11
Late stage (III, IV)65 (63.1)240 (79.5)2.2 (1.39–3.69)2.19 (1.18–4.06)<0.001a
Recurrence
No2 (1.9)16 (5.3)11
Yes101 (98.1)286 (94.7)0.35 (0.08–1.56)0.57 (0.11–2.82)0.171
Coexisting diseases
No88 (85.4)228 (75.5)11
Yes15 (14.6)74 (24.5)1.9(1.04–3.49)1.41 (0.7–2.86)0.088

COR, Crude odds ratio; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval

Statistically significant at p < 0.05

For every 1-year increment in age, the odds of physical unmet needs increases by 3% (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01–1.06). The odds of physical needs were nine times more in patients with prostate and eight times more in lung cancer patients than breast cancer patients (AOR = 9.1; 95% CI: 2.34–35.34) and (AOR = 8.15; 95% CI: 1.76–37.6), respectively. Similarly, the odds of unmet physical needs were six times more in patients undergoing surgery compared with patients taking chemotherapy in the last 1 month (AOR = 6.92; 95% CI: 2.95–16.2). The odds of unmet physical needs were two times more in patients with end-stage cancer than patients who had early-stage cancer (AOR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.18–4.06) (Table 2).

Factors associated with psychological need domain

Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that, age sex, educational level, occupational status, presence of health insurance, household income, sources of information and informational status, cancer site, stage of cancer, treatment option, and time since diagnosis, remission and recurrences of disease were important candidates for the final model. However, only age, cancer site, stage of cancer and source of information become significant predictors in the multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 3).
Table 3.

Binary and multivariable logistic regression of variables associated with psychological need domain among oncology patients at DRH, Dessie, Ethiopia, 2020.

VariablesPsychological need
No needSome needCOR (CI)AOR (CI)p value
Age 1.04 (1.02–1.06)1.02 (1.01–1.03–1.09)<0.001
Sex
Female217 (66.2)58 (75.3)11
Male111 (33.8)19 (24.7)1.56 (0.88–2.75)0.96 (0.46–1.98)0.123
Educational status
Unable to read and write36 (46.8)175 (53.4)11
Primary education29 (37.7)68 (20.7)0.48 (0.28–0.84)0.73 (0.34–1.56)0.071
Secondary education6 (7.8)40 (12.2)1.37 (0.54–3.47)2.12 (0.59–7.53)0.506
College and above6 (7.8)45 (13.7)1.54 (0.61–3.89)1.72 (0.39–7.51)0.358
Household monthly income
0–1,50036 (46.8)119 (36.3)11
1,501–200020 (26.0)71 (21.6)1.07 (0.58–1.99)1.37 (0.63–2.97)0.822
2,001–2,7006 (7.8)54 (16.5)2.7 (1.08–6.84)2.23 (0.75–6.63)0.077
>2,70015 (19.5)84 (25.6)1.69 (0.87–3.29)1.4 (0.49–4.03)0.120
Health insurance
Yes52 (67.5)181 (55.2)11
No25 (32.5)147 (44.8)0.59 (0.35–1.00)1.08 (0.55–2.09)0.592
Source of information
Physician50 (64.9)191 (58.2)11
Physician and reading13 (16.9)85 (25.9)1.71 (0.88–3.31)2.61 (1.15–5.93)0.011a
Cancer site
Breast39 (50.6)99 (30.2)11
Colon3 (3.9)36 (11.0)4.7 (1.37–16.25)1.86 (0.48–7.23)0.064
Prostate2 (2.6)34 (10.4)6.6 (1.53–29.22)7.17 (1.3–39.6)0.011a
Lung5 (6.5)32 (9.8)2.56 (0.91–6.94)1.29 (0.39–4.22)0.074
Skin4 (5.2)26 (7.9)2.56 (0.84–7.81)1.86 (0.52–6.63)0.099
Cervical14 (18.2)69 (21.0)1.94 (0.98–3.85)1.05 (0.44-2.5)0.057
Lipoma10 (13.0)32 (9.8)1.26 (0.56–2.81)0.76 (0.27–2.13)0.571
Treatment option
Chemotherapy53 (68.8)187 (57.0)11
Surgery10 (13.0)74 (22.6)2.09 (1.01–4.34)2.18 (0.92–5.21)0.046
Analgesia14 (18.2)67 (20.4)1.35 (0.71–2.6)0.43 (0.18–4.57)0.359
Cancer stage
Early stage (I, II)30 (39.0)70 (21.3)11
Late stage (III, IV)47 (61.0)258 (78.7)2.35 (1.38–3.99)2.32 (1.18–4.57)0.023a
Recurrence
No1 (1.3)17 (5.2)11
Yes76 (98.7)311 (94.8)0.24 (0.03–1.83)0.3 (0.032–2.95)
Time since diagnosis 0.98 (0.96–1.00)0.98 (0.95–1.01)0.067
Remission
No10 (13.0)159 (48.5)11
Yes67 (87.0)169 (51.5)0.16 (0.08–0.32)0.089 (0.036–0.22)<0.001a

COR, Crude odds ratio; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval

Statistically significant at p < 0.05

For every year increment in age, the odds of unmet psychological needs increased by 6% (AOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03–1.09). The unmet psychological needs were seven times greater in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer when compared with patients diagnosed with breast cancer (AOR = 7.1; 95% CI: 1.3–39.6). Similarly, late-stage cancer patients had 2.3 times unmet psychological needs than early-stage cancer patients (AOR = 2.32; 95% CI: 1.18–4.57). Patients who had sources of information from both health professionals and self-reading had 2.6 times unmet psychological needs than those who had information only from health professionals (AOR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.15–5.93). However, the unmet psychological needs were 0.09 times less among patients with a history of remission than no history of remission (AOR = 0.089; 95% CI: 0.036–0.22) (Table 3).

Factors associated with health system information need

Variables significantly associated in the binary logistic regression were age, occupational status, monthly household income, cancer site, treatment option, stage of cancer, recurrences of diseases and time since diagnosis. However, in the multivariable logistic regression, only treatment option, stage of cancer, higher income and sources of information were significantly associated with health system information needs (Table 4).
Table 4.

Binary and multivariable logistic regression of variables associated with health system information need domain among oncology patients at DRH, Dessie, Ethiopia, 2020.

VariablesHealth system information need
No needSome needCOR (CI)AOR (CI)p value
Age 1.01 (0.99–1.03)1.01 (0.88–1.04)0.876
Occupational status
Employed44 (13.8)10 (11.5)11
Paid work95 (30.2)23 (26.4)1.05 (0.46–2.4)1.32 (0.52–3.33)0.900
Jobless169 (53.1)49 (56.3)1.27 (0.59–2.72)1.66 (0.58–4.76)0.528
Retired9 (2.8)5 (5.7)2.44 (0.67–8.89)2.62 (0.55–12.4)0.175
Household income
0–1,500112 (35.2)43 (49.4)11
1,501–2,00078 (24.5)13 (14.9)1.8 (1.29–5.86)0.59 (1.27–5.27)0.002
2,001–2,70053 (16.7)7 (8)2.0 (1.14–6.81)1.5 (1.15–4.01)0.003
>2,70075 (23.6)24 (27.6)2.56 (2.46–9.49)2.2 (1.33–13.93)0.001
Source of information
Physician207 (65.1)34 (39.1)11
Physician and reading65 (20.4)33 (37.9)3.09 (1.78–5.38)3.06 (1.63–5.76)<0.001a
Cancer site
Breast106 (33.3)32 (36.8)11
Colon31 (9.7)8 (9.2)0.85 (0.35–2.04)0.94 (0.36–2.41)0.724
Prostate25 (7.9)11 (12.6)1.45 (0.65–3.28)1.49 (0.57–3.83)0.363
Lung29 (9.1)8 (9.2)0.91 (0.38–2.2)0.9 (0.35–2.32)0.840
Skin23 (7.2)7 (8.0)1.00 (0.39–2.56)0.94 (0.34–2.6)0.986
Cervical67 (21.1)16 (18.4)0.79 (0.4–1.55)1.26 (0.58–2.74)0.495
Lipoma37 (11.6)5 (5.7)0.48 (0.16–1.23)0.46 (0.15–1.37)0.120
Treatment option
Chemotherapy187 (58.8)53 (60.9)11
Surgery57 (17.9)27 (17.9)1.67 (0.96–2.89)1.88 (0.98–3.52)0.067
Analgesia74 (23.3)7 (8.0)0.33 (0.14–0.77)0.3 (0.12–0.77)0.01a
Cancer stage
Early stage (I, II)83 (26.1)17 (19.5)11
Late stage (III, IV)235 (73.9)70 (80.5)1.45 (0.81–2.61)2 (1.03–3.86)<0.001a
Recurrence
No10 (3.1)8 (9.2)11
Yes308 (96.9)79 (90.8)0.32 (0.12–0.84)0.38 (0.13–1.12)0.170

COR, Crude odds ratio; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval

Statistically significant at p < 0.05

The unmet health information needs were 68% less likely in patients who take analgesia than those taking chemotherapy (AOR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.13–0.82). Similarly, unmet health information needs were two times more in patients who had end-stage cancer than patients who had early-stage cancer (AOR = 2; 95% CI: 1.03–3.86). In addition, patients who had household income of ≥2,700 ETB per month had 2.2 times unmet health system need. Moreover, patients who had sources of information from health professionals and self-reading had three times unmet health information needs than those who had information from only health professionals (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.65–5.82) (Table 4).

Factors associated with patient care or supportive need

First cancer site, remission status, time since diagnosis and sources of information were significant predictors of patient or supportive care needs. The unmet patient care/supportive care needs were 63% less likely in patients who had a history of remission when compared with patients who had no history of remission (AOR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22–0.62). For every 1 month increase of time since diagnosis, the unmet patient care/supportive needs increased by 2% (AOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00–1.04). Patients who had sources of information from health professionals and reading had more than two times unmet needs than patients who had sources of information only from health professionals (AOR = 2.2;95% CI: 1.25–3.87). Patients with skin cancer had three times unmet supportive needs than breast cancer patients (AOR = 2.53; 95% CI: 1.04–6.17) (Table 5).
Table 5.

Binary and multivariable logistic regression of variables associated with patient/supportive need domain among oncology patients at DRH, Dessie, Ethiopia, 2020.

VariablesPatient care/supportive need
No needSome needCOR (CI)AOR (CI)p value
Educational status
Unable to read and write135 (53.4)76 (50.0)11
Secondary not completed61 (24.1)36 (23.7)1.05 (0.63–1.72)1.23 (0.67–2.28)0.853
Secondary education29 (11.5)17 (11.2)1.04 (0.54–2.01)0.74 (0.31–1.79)0.905
College and above28 (11.1)23 (15.1)1.46 (0.78–2.71)0.87 (0.32–2.37)0.232
Marital status
Single26 (10.3)15 (9.9)11
Married173 (68.4)95 (62.5)0.95 (0.48–1.88)0.91 (0.40–2.08)0.887
Divorced16 (6.3)18 (11.8)0.95 (0.77–4.92)1.5 (0.50–4.47)0.157
Widowed38 (15.0)24 (15.8)1.09 (0.48–2.47)1.03 (0.35–3.0)0.828
Health insurance
Yes157 (62.1)76 (50.0)11
No96 (37.9)76 (50.0)0.61 (0.41–0.92)0.78 (0.8–1.25)0.058
Household income
0–1,50096 (37.9)59 (38.8)11
1,501–2,00066 (26.1)25 (16.4)0.61 (0.35–1.08)0.65 (0.35–1.21)0.092
2,001–2,70036 (14.2)24 (15.8)1.08 (0.59–1.99)1.14 (0.56–2.33)0.794
>2,70055 (21.7)44 (28.9)1.3 (0.78–2.17)1.31 (0.61–2.79)0.313
Sources of information
Physician159 (62.8)82 (53.9)11
Physician and reading48 (19.0)50 (32.9)2.02 (1.05–3.25)2.2 (1.25–3.87)0.004a
Mixed46 (18.2)20 (13.2)0.84 (0.47–1.52)0.99 (0.51–1.91)0.570
Cancer site
Breast96 (37.9)42 (27.6)11
Colon25 (9.9)14 (9.2)1.28 (0.6–2.7)1.09 (0.48–2.5)0.518
Prostate19 (7.5)17 (11.2)2.04 (0.97–4.322.07 (0.88–4.87)0.061
Lung19 (7.5)17 (11.2)1.74 (0.82–3.671.72 (0.75–3.91)0.144
Skin21 (8.3)16 (10.5)2.0 (0.89–4.46)2.53 (1.04–6.17)0.011a
Cervical50 (19.8)33 (21.7)1.51 (0.85–2.67)1.61 (0.82–3.14)0.157
Lipoma26 (10.3)16 (10.5)1.41 (0.68–2.89)1.62 (0.71–3.68)0.353
Treatment option
Chemotherapy154 (60.9)86 (56.6)11
Surgery45 (17.8)39 (25.7)1.55 (0.94–2.57)1.36 (0.76–2.43)0.087
Analgesia54 (21.3)27 (17.8)0.89 (0.52–1.52)0.61 (0.32–1.17)0.684
Remission status
No89 (35.2)80 (52.6)11
Yes164 (64.8)72 (47.4)0.49 (0.32–0.73)0.37 (0.22–0.62)0.001a
Recurrence
No6 (2.4)12 (7.9)11
Yes247 (97.6)140 (92.1)0.28 (0.1–0.77)0.34 (0.11–1.03)0.0174
Time since diagnosis 1.01 (0.99–1.03)1.02 (1.00–1.04)0.042a

COR. Crude odds ratio; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval

Statistically significant at p < 0.05

Discussion

The study assesses the prevalence and associated factors of unmet supportive care needs of oncology patients at Dessie Referral Hospital. The study revealed that unmet psychological and physical needs were the most unmet supportive care needs domains accounting 81.0% (95% CI = 77–84.9) and 74.6% (95% CI = 70.1–79.0), respectively. In addition, old age and household income, cancer site, treatment option, cancer stage, remission, time since diagnosis and sources of information were associated with one or more domains of unmet supportive care need. The highest unmet supportive care need was recorded under the psychological and physical/daily living domain. Concerns about being able to feel about themselves, anxiety, feelings of sadness and fears about cancer spreading were paramount among unmet needs experienced by patients. The finding is comparable with other studies conducted in Nigeria, United Kingdom, Australia and United Arab Emirates [11, 19, 31, 32]. Emphasising sustained focus on Psycho-oncology treatment and the normal treatment for cancer patients will reduce the unmet needs of cancer patients. The second top unmet need domain was related to the physical domain, accounting about 74.6%. This is similar to the Iranian study [33]. However, studies conducted in Indonesia and Denmark states as the first top unmet needs accounting (80.4%) and (40%), respectively [21, 34]. The explanation could be that cancer treatments, i.e. chemotherapy and surgery have serious side effects like tiredness, vomiting and unable to do normal activities. As a result, this makes them have high physical unmet needs. The least unmet need was related to the sexuality domain. This is in line with studies conducted in Iran [35], Nigeria [32] and Malaysia [36]. However, a study conducted in the United States revealed that the sexuality domain was the most unmet needs of patients [17]. The discrepancy might be due to the cultural, religious and ethical differences of the two countries. Most of the patients in our country are culturally conservative and not ready to disclose information related to sexual behaviour. As a result, further qualitative study is needed to explore the actual sexual needs of the patients. Another reason may be patients may not consider sexual needs as important as other needs like psychological and physical needs. Our study found that for every increment of age by 1 year, the odds of unmet psychological and physical needs increased by 6% and 3%, respectively. This is in line with studies conducted in Chicago and England stating older patients had the high unmet needs in physical/daily living and psychological need domain [37, 38]. On the contrary, other researches conducted in the UK and the USA claimed that young age was more prone to unmet supportive health care needs [11, 39]. This discrepancy could be explained by old patients are easily fatigued; they cannot resist the side effect of complex and long-term chemotherapy and surgery treatments. As a result, they may develop the unmet physical/psychological needs. The study also showed high-income patients had high unmet health information needs. Contrary to this, a study done in Athens revealed that high income was less associated with unmet supportive care needs [40]. Economically stable patients may need better treatment options as they can afford the medical fee of private hospitals. However, as the treatment is available at public hospitals, high-income patients may be disappointed by the service delivery compared to private hospitals. Besides, patients who have sources of information from both physician and self-reading have unmet health information need. According to Ethiopia’s medical ethical book on Article 27 states, ‘On legitimate grounds, left to the discretion of the doctor, information about serious diagnoses and/or prognosis may be withheld unless the patient demands it’ [41]. As a result, physicians may hold necessary information related to a disease. So, a patient who had sources of information besides a physician will better understand the prognosis and unfavourable outcome of a disease, and they may develop unmet health system need. Another possibility could be the increasing number of oncology patients leading them to short consultation time with physicians to address all the patients’ questions resulting from unmet health information needs. The current study revealed that prostate cancer patients were more likely to have unmet needs in the physical and psychological domains (AOR = 9.1; 95% CI: 2.34–35.7) and AOR = 7.17; 95% CI: 1.3–39.6) than breast cancer patients, respectively. Contrarily, a study done in Latin shows that breast cancer survivors reported greater unmet needs compared to both prostate and colorectal cancer survivors (OR 2.33–5.86) [42]. This may be related to most prostate cancer patients having tumour or pain around the gentile area. This makes them psychologically discomfort and unable to move freely to work their normal activities. As a result, patients may need support from another person. Late-stage cancer patients were two times more likely to have an unmet physical, psychological and health information needs. Similarly in a study done in Malaysia, cancer survivors with an advanced-stage diagnosis had greater physical and psychological needs [43]. This may be related to patients with advanced disease who will have complicated and long-term treatment. The unexpected side effect and struggle for complex and length treatment lead them to have physical and psychological unmet needs. Besides, patients with late-stage cancer will have less survival probability. This finding implies early intervention, and rehabilitation treatment has great clinical importance for cancer patients. The other variable significantly associated with psychological and patient care/supportive needs is the remission status. Patients with remission were less likely to develop unmet patient care needs (p < 0.001). This finding is similar with a Danish population-based study [34]. Patients with remission may adapt to the condition of the diseases and hospital environment. Besides, suppose a patient has repeated visits to the hospital. In that case, they may have access to get information and understand their disease condition, making a patient be psychologically ready and decrease their patient care/supportive needs. Current study states that for every increase of time since diagnosis by 1 month, the odds of the unmet patient care and supportive needs increase by 2%. Similar findings have been reported in an Australian study [44]. The possible reason could be when the time since diagnosis is prolonged, the disease will progress late-stage increasing the severity of the illness. Thus, patients will develop to the verity of the disease increases leading them to develop patient care needs. Generally, patients treated at DRH had high unmet supportive care needs, especially in psychological, physical and health information needs. Hence, different services and supports that address these needs should be prioritised to fulfil these needs by the patients.

Strengths and limitations

This is the first study conducted at the only oncology centre of North-East Ethiopia to determine factors associated with unmet supportive care needs of oncology patients. As a result, its representativeness is high in the region. However, due to the study’s cross-sectional nature, the study could not show a cause and effect relationship. Besides, excluding patients who are unable to respond due to illness during the data collection may underestimate the specific need of those patients.

Conclusion

This study revealed that the unmet supportive care needs of a patient within each domain are significantly high. Physical/daily living, psychological and health information/system were the topmost unmet need of cancer patients. In addition, age, income, education status, cancer site, treatment option, stage of cancer, remission and sources of information were associated with increased occurrences of unmet supportive care needs. Thus, the supportive care of cancer patients should be incorporated in the cancer treatment protocol. Furthermore, longitudinal and qualitative researches are better to measure the unmet need of cancer patients at different levels and exploring the unmet need of patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All the necessary data are available in the main manuscript document and its supporting information file.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

Wollo University.

Author’s contributions

AM, HY, AM and KA were involved in initiating the idea, write up of the proposal, data collection, data entry, data analysis and final manuscript write up. In contrast, FM, ZA, HE and SE were involved in the final manuscript editing and write up. Finally, all authors were involved in the approval of the final manuscript.
Q.NOQUESTIONNARIESRESPONSE
01Age____________
02Sex

male

Femalle

03Marital status

single

married

Divorced/separated

Widowed

Never married/single

04Educational Level

anable to write and read

Secondary not completed

Secondary completed

Trade/certificate/diploma

Tertiary completed

05occupation

employment

Paid work

Not working

Retired

06Income______________
07Resident

Urban

Rural

07Primary cancer site

Breast

Colon and rectum

Prostate

Lung

Skin/melanoma

Don’t know

Other

08Treatment received in last month

Chemotherapy

Radiotherapy

Surgical removal of cancer

Immunotherapy

Hormone treatment

Bone marrow treatment

Othe

09Time since diagnosis------------------
010Remission

yes

no

011Another illness other than cancer

yes

no

012Type of diseases
012Stage of cancer at time of diagnosis

I

II

III

IV

Unknown

013Fear of recurrences

yes

no

014Treatment side effect

yes

no

NoQuestionsCoding categoriesSkip
During your current disease or treatment, have you received information on:
01The diagnosis of your disease?

yes

no

02The extent (spread) of your disease?

yes

no

03The possible causes of your disease?

yes

no

04The purpose of any medical tests you have had or may undergo

yes

no

05The procedures of the medical tests?

yes

no

06The medical treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery or other treatment modality)?

yes

no

07The sequence of the medical treatments?

yes

no

08The expected benefit of the treatment?

yes

no

09The possible side-effects of your treatment?

yes

no

010Where did you inform about the duration of your treatments?

yes

no

011From whom did you hear about your diagnosis?Record all mentioned

health professional

from a family member

other patients

other

Physical need domain (5 items)Coding category
No needUnmet need
No Not applicable satisfied Low need Moderat need High need
1Pain12345
2Lack of energy/tiredness12345
3Feeling unwell most of the time12345
4Work around the home12345
5Not being able to do the thing you used to do12345
ተ.ቁጥያቄወችመለስ
01የተቀሙ ስም
02እድሜ____________
03ፆታ1.ወንድ2.ሴት
04የጋብቻ ሁኔታ1. ያላገባ2. ያገባ3. የተፋታ 4. ባለቤትዋ የሞተባት/የሞተበት5. አግብቶ የማያቅ/አግብታ የማታውቅ
05የትም/ት ደረጃ1.ማንበብና መፃፍ የማይችል2.ሁለተኛ ደረጃ ትም/ት ያላጠናቀቀ3. .ሁለተኛ ደረጃ ትም/ት ያጠናቀቀ4.ሰርቲፊኬት/ድፕሎማ5.ድግሪ ወይም ከዚያ በላይ
06የስራ ሁኔታ1.ቅጥር2.የግል ስራ 3.ስራ አጥ 4.በጡረታ የወጣ
07የገቢ ሁኔታ______________
08የመኖሪያ ቦታ1.ገጠር2.ከተማ
08የጤና መድህን አለወት1.አዋ2.
09ካንሰሩ በቅድሚያ የጀመረበት የሰውነት ክፍል1.ጡት2.አንጀት 3.የዘር ፍሬ 4.ሳምባ5.ቆዳ6.አይታወቅም7.ሌላ
010በባለፈው አንድ ወር ያገኘው የህክምና ሁኔታ1.ኬሞ ቴራፒ2.ራዲወ ቴራፒ 3.የቀዶ ህክምና 4.ኢሚኒየዎ ቴራፒ 5.የሆርሞን ህክምና 6.የቦን ማሮው ህክምና 7.ሌሎች
011በሽታው የታወቀበት ጊዜ---------------
012የመሻል ሁኔታ1.አወ2.አይደለም
013ሌሎች ተያያዥ በሽታወች አሉ1.አዋ2.የለም
014አው ካሉ ምን ምን
015በሽታው በታወቀበት ጊዜ የነበርው የካንሰሩ ደረጃ1.I2.II3.III04.IV5.አያታወቅም
016በሽታ ው መልሶ የመከሰት እድል1.አለው2.የለውም
017ህክምናው የጎንዮሽ ጉዳት አለው1.አዋ2.የለዉም
ተ.ቁጥያቄዎችመልሶችናየኮድመደቦች
01ህመምዎምን እንደሆን ተነግሮዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
02የህመምዎን ደረጃ እና ሁኔታ ተነግሮዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
03የህመምዎ መንስኤ ምን ሊሆን እንደሚችልተነግሮዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
04እስካሁን ያደረጉት የጤና ምርመራዎች ወይም ከዚህ በኃላየሚያደርጉትለምን እንደሆነ ተነግሮዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
05የጤና ምርመራዎቹ እንዴት እንደ ሚካሄዱ ተነግዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
06ለአርሰዎ ህመም ሊሆኑ የሚችሉ የህክምና አይነቶች እነማንእንደሆኑ ተነግሮዎታል? (ጨረር፤የቀዶ ጥገና ወይም ሌላህክምና አይነቶች)1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
07አንዱን ህክምና ሲጨርሱ የትኛውን ህክምናእንደሚቀጥሉስተነግሮዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
08ህክምናዎቹ የሚሰጡት ጥቅሞች ተነግሮዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
09በህክምናዎቹ ምክንያት ስሊኖሩ የሚችሉ የጎንዮሽ ጉዳቶችስ ተነግሮዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
010ህክምናው ለምን ያክል ጊዜ ሊቆይ እንደሚችል ተነግሮዎታል?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
011ስለ ህመመዎ እና አጠቃላይ ሁኔታ መረጃውችን ከየት ነው የሚያገኙት?1. አዎ 2. አልተነገረኝም
ተ.ቁየአካልና የቀንከቀን ኑሮላይያለሁኔታ(5 ጥያቄዎች)የኮድ መደቦች
ፍላጎት ያለ መኖርፍላጎት መኖር
ይሄችግርየለኝምፍላጎቴተሞልቶልትንሽፍላጎትአለኝመጠነኛፍላጎትአለኝከፍተኛፍላጎትአለኝ
1ህመም12345
2የጉልበት ማጣት12345
3የደህንነት ስሜት ማጣት12345
4በቤት አካባቢ ስራ መስራት12345
5መስራት የሚፍልጉትን አለመስራት12345
ሰነ-አይምሮ (10 ጥያቄዎች)ፍላጎት ያለ መኖርፍላጎት መኖር
ይሄችግርየለኝምፍላጎቴተሞልቶልትንሽፍላጎትአለኝመጠነኛፍላጎትአለኝከፍተኛፍላጎትአለኝ
1ፍርሀት12345
2የበታችነት ወይም የድብርት ስሜት12345
3የመከፋት ስሜት12345
4ወደሌላ ቦታ ይዛመትብኛል የሚል ፍርሃት12345
5ህክምናወ ለውጥ አያመጣም ብሎ መጨነቅ12345
6የተስፋ መቁረጥ ስሜት12345
7በሥታው ከአቅሜ በላይ ነው ብሎ መጨነቅ12345
8እድናለሁ ብሎ ማሰብ12345
9እሞታለሁ ብሎ ማሰብ1245
10ስለተፈጠረው ነገር አብዝቶ መጨነቅ12345
ህመምተኛውን ስለ መንከባከብና እገዛ (3ጥያቄዎች)ፍላጎት ያለ መኖርፍላጎት መኖር
ይሄችግርየለኝምፍላጎቴተሞልቶልትንሽፍላጎትአለኝመጠነኛፍላጎትአለኝከፍተኛፍላጎትአለኝ
1በህክምና ቡድኑ መተማማን12345
2የሆስፒታሉ ስታፎች ቅንነትና ትብብር12345
3የሆስፒታሉ ስታፎች ቤተሰባዊ ድጋፍና ቅርበት12345
ከጤና ጋርየተገናኘ መረጃ (4 ጥያቄዎች)ፍላጎት ያለ መኖርፍላጎት መኖር
ይሄችግርየለኝምፍላጎቴተሞልቶልትንሽፍላጎትአለኝመጠነኛፍላጎትአለኝከፍተኛፍላጎትአለኝ
1አንዲብራራሎት ስለሚፈልጉት የማርመራ አይነት ማብራሪያ አግንተዋል12345
2የህክምናው አይነት ከመምረጥዋ በፊት ስለ ጥቅምና ተጓዳኝ ችግሮች ተነገርዎታል12345
3ስለ ምርመራ ውጤትዋ መግለጫ ተሰጥተዋል12345
4የታከሙበት ሀኪም ቤት የሚቻለውን ያክል አካዊ አርካታ የሚያኙበት ነበር12345
ስለሰነ-ጾታ (3 ጥያቄዎች)ፍላጎት ያለ መኖርፍላጎት መኖር
ይሄችግርየለኝምፍላጎቴተሞልቶልትንሽፍላጎትአለኝመጠነኛፍላጎትአለኝከፍተኛፍላጎትአለኝ
1ከፍቅር አጋር ጋር ያለ ስሜት መቀነስ12345
2የግብረስጋ ግንኙነት ፍላጎት መቀነስ12345
3ስለ ፆታዊ ግንኙነት መረጃ አግኝተዋል12345
  32 in total

Review 1.  Supportive care for cancer patients.

Authors:  M Fitch
Journal:  Hosp Q       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Supportive care needs of parents of children with cancer: transition from diagnosis to treatment.

Authors:  Laura M J Kerr; Margaret B Harrison; Jennifer Medves; Joan Tranmer
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Unmet supportive care needs in Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors: prevalence and associations with patient-provider communication, satisfaction with cancer care, and symptom burden.

Authors:  Patricia I Moreno; Amelie G Ramirez; Sandra L San Miguel-Majors; Leopoldo Castillo; Rina S Fox; Kipling J Gallion; Edgar Munoz; Ryne Estabrook; Arely Perez; Thomas Lad; Courtney Hollowell; Frank J Penedo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  B Bonevski; R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; L Burton; P Cook; A Boyes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Assessing the unmet information, support and care delivery needs of men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eric W Boberg; David H Gustafson; Robert P Hawkins; Kenneth P Offord; Courtney Koch; Kuang-Yi Wen; Kendra Kreutz; Andrew Salner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-03

6.  Assessing the unmet supportive care needs of newly diagnosed patients with cancer.

Authors:  G Sutherland; D Hill; M Morand; M Pruden; S-A McLachlan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tsion Afework; Abigiya Wondimagegnehu; Natnael Alemayehu; Eva Johanna Kantelhardt; Adamu Addissie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The cancer burden and cancer control in developing countries.

Authors:  Paola Pisani
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Does the cancer patient want to know? Results from a study in an Indian tertiary cancer center.

Authors:  Shekhawat Laxmi; Joad Anjum Khan
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2013-04

Review 10.  Epidemiology of major non-communicable diseases in Ethiopia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Awoke Misganaw; Damen Haile Mariam; Ahmed Ali; Tekebash Araya
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.