Literature DB >> 26898558

Most prevalent unmet supportive care needs and quality of life of breast cancer patients in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.

Zobaida Edib1, Verasingam Kumarasamy2, Norlia Binti Abdullah3, A M Rizal4, Sami Abdo Radman Al-Dubai5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Addressing breast cancer patients' unmet supportive care needs in the early stage of their survivorship have become a prime concern because of its significant association with poor quality of life (QOL), which in turn increases healthcare utilization and costs. There is no study about unmet supportive care needs of breast cancer patients in Malaysia. This study aims to assess the most prevalent unmet supportive care needs of Malaysian breast cancer patients and the association between QOL and patients' characteristics, and their unmet supportive care needs.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Surgery and Oncology Clinic between May 2014 and June 2014 in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. A total of 117 patients out of 133 breast cancer patients recruited by universal sampling were interviewed using a structured questionnaire consisted of three parts: participants' socio-demographic and disease characteristics, Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
RESULTS: The highest unmet supportive care needs were observed in the psychological domain (Mean 53.31; SD ± 21.79), followed by physical domain (Mean 38.16; SD ± 27.15). Most prevalent unmet supportive care needs were uncertainty about the future (78.6 %), fears about the cancer spreading (76.1 %), feelings of sadness (69.2 %), feelings about death and dying (68.4 %), concerns about those close to the patient (65.0 %) and feeling down or depressed (65.0 %). Multivariate linear analysis showed that early breast cancer survivors diagnosed at an advanced stage and with greater physical and psychological needs were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with poorer QOL.
CONCLUSION: Most prevalent unmet needs among Malaysian breast cancer patients were found in the psychological domain. Early breast cancer survivors with late stage diagnosis who had more unmet needs in psychological and physical domains were more likely to have a poor QOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26898558      PMCID: PMC4762172          DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0428-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes        ISSN: 1477-7525            Impact factor:   3.186


Background

Worldwide the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women is the cancer of breast [1]. About half of the breast cancer cases and 60 % of the deaths are estimated to occur in economically developing countries [2]. The breast cancer incidence rates in Malaysia has increased during last three decades at an alarming rate and become an inevitable threat to women. It is estimated that one in 19 women in Malaysia are at lifetime risk, compared to one in 8 in Europe and the United States [2]. Increased awareness, early detection, combination treatment of chemotherapy, irradiation, hormone therapy and advancement of target therapies, as well as better characterization of prognostic factors have remarkably improved the survival rate of women with breast cancer worldwide [3, 4]. The five-year survival rate in the west is 70 to 90 %, in developing countries 57 % and globally 61 % [5, 6]. In Malaysia, the five-year survival rate for breast cancer is 49 % with median interval of 68.1 months and is continuing to escalate every year [7]. Cancer survivorship is an unremitting struggle as the consequence of complex treatment process and it’s multitude of residual and late emerging side effects that have significant impact on physical, psychological, sexual, social and sometimes financial disturbances throughout the post-treatment phase [8-11]. This is considered to be a major aspect that gives rise to multiple unmet needs for breast cancer survivors [12]. Supportive care helps a cancer patient cope with the disease throughout the process of diagnosis, treatment and post-treatment phases [13]. Supportive care is defined as rendering essential services that satisfy cancer patients’ physical, psychological, social, informational and spiritual needs over the entire illness trajectory [14, 15]. Although it is acknowledged as an essential service, 1–93 % of cancer patients’ supportive needs have been consistently unmet [15, 16]. There is growing evidence that the needs perceived by breast cancer patients and the support being provided by the healthcare professionals are diverse [8, 17, 18]. Hence, it is found that the breast cancer patients mostly suffer from physical, emotional, social, financial and psychological disturbances to a greater extent and unmet needs were highest in the post-treatment phase compared to the other phases of cancer continuum [10, 15, 19, 20]. Supportive care is an essential buffering component of cancer patients that helps to regain emotional stability, social adjustment, cognitive function, body image, future perspective and physical strength [21-24]. Understanding the full impact of unmet needs of the breast cancer patients on their QOL is crucial and clinically of prime importance throughout their continuum of survivorship to offer timely effective interventions. Many studies have found that most unmet needs were in the early stage of cancer survivorship that had detrimental effects on QOL of cancer patients [25-27]. However, several studies suggesting that greater supportive care was associated with long survival and better QOL [27-29]. Thus improving the QOL of breast cancer patients requires addressing the unmet supportive care needs of the breast cancer patients [30]. Assessing needs also offer a direct measure of the patients’ support preference and service gaps [31]. Studying the perception of the breast cancer patients’ unmet supportive care needs clarifies where actions and resource allocation are necessary in healthcare setting to help the patients to overcome their difficulties. Effective high quality management in healthcare setting is accounted as more than just delivery of anti-cancer therapy [22, 32]. However, it focuses on identification of unsatisfied needs of cancer patients that provides the opportunity to enhance the QOL, which in turn also reduces health care utilization and costs [33-37]. Evaluating these unmet supportive care needs of the breast cancer patients enables healthcare providers to identify those which lack the level of service or support they perceive essential to achieve the optimal quality of life (QOL). In this context, addressing breast cancer patients’ unmet needs in the early stage of their survivorship provides rationale to enhance their QOL and guidance for new strategies in healthcare setting that could potentially reduce the burden of this disease and treatment in the long run and thereby improve their QOL. Existing knowledge on unmet supportive care needs of the breast cancer patients and QOL is predominantly from the western countries. However, there is no evidence of addressing unmet supportive care needs of breast cancer patients and how it is associated with QOL in Malaysia. This study aims to assess the most prevalent unmet supportive care needs of breast cancer patients and the association between QOL and these patients’ characteristics, and their unmet supportive care needs in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.

Methods

Study design and sample

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Surgery and Oncology Clinic on Clinic Day in University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC) between May 2014 and June 2014 among breast cancer patients. Inclusion criteria for recruiting the patients were: female primary and recurrent breast cancer patients of all ages and with any stages, who had survived at least one year after being diagnosed by a registered physician, must be Malaysian and who can speak either English or Malay. Excluded from this study were those who had secondary breast cancer and were terminally ill and those who were not able to speak.

Instruments

A structured questionnaire was used in this study which consisted of the following parts: participants’ socio-demographic and disease characteristics, Supportive Care Needs Survey -Short Form (SCNS-SF 34) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). SCNS-SF34 is a standardised instrument for measuring cancer patients’ perceived needs across a range of domains. A total number of 34-items are divided into five domains: physical/daily living (5 items), psychological (10 items), sexuality (3 items), patient care and support (5 items) and health system and information needs (10 items). Internal consistency was high with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the five domains ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 [38]. A five-point rating scale (1 = no need/not applicable, 2 = no need/satisfied, 3 = low need, 4 = moderate need and 5 = high need) is used to rate the levels of need over the past month. Standardised likert summated score was used to score SCNS-SF34 according to Supportive Care Needs Survey scoring manual. The score has possible values ranging from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more unmet needs [39]. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a standardized questionnaire which was constructed by the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group to measure the quality of life of cancer patients. The linear transformation of the raw score of the global QOL was done according to EORTC scoring manual to standardize the raw score so that it ranges from 0 to100 [40]. The correlation coefficient for global QOL was 0.85 [41]. The Malay version of the questionnaire was prepared for the participants who cannot speak English. The questionnaire was translated into Malay language by an independent language expert who was not associated with this study. This Malay version of the questionnaire was then back-translated into English by another independent language expert not associated with this study. This second English version of the questionnaire was then re-translated into Malay by another independent language expert not associated with this study. Both the two sets of English and Malay version were subsequently compared with the original version by the Breast and Reconstructive Surgeons for the conceptual equivalence of the items. Then the final questionnaire was verified by the Surgery Department of UKMMC and the Community Medicine Department of International Medical University. Minor modifications were made wherever applicable to the translated questionnaires to remove discrepancies. Pre-testing was done on a sample of eight breast cancer patients at the Surgery Clinic of UKMMC to assess the acceptance and time management.

Ethical consideration

The study was approved by Medical Ethics Committee of International Medical University (Project Number: M.ScPHI01/2014(01) and Research Ethics Committee of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (Approval Number: 1.5.3.5/244/FF-2014-255).

Procedure

A convenience sample of 133 breast cancer patients defined by the sampling criteria were recruited from the Surgery and Oncology out-patient clinic of UKMMC. The study was conducted on a voluntary basis where the selected participants voluntarily agreed to take part in this study. Out of total 133 breast cancer patients, 117 patients voluntarily agreed to take part in the study and gave their written informed consent. Participants were well informed about the purpose of the study and reassured that all the personal information will be kept confidential, and they could withdraw their consent anytime without giving any reason. In addition to that, briefing on the questionnaire in both English and Malay was conducted to ensure the accuracy of collecting information. The participants were allowed to enquire any questions related to the questionnaire. Data were obtained through interviewer-administered questionnaire to ensure the quality of collected information and reduce the refusal rate. Two trained interviewers were assigned for the briefing of the study, securing written informed consent and for conducting the interviews under the direct supervision of the researcher. However, the interviewers and the researcher had no relation with the participants.

Data analysis

Data were tabulated and analysed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analysis was used for demographic and disease characteristics as well as supportive care needs items. Mean, median scores and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for supportive care needs’ domains. Univariate analyses of the relationship between the global QOL and domains of supportive care needs, and participants’ socio-demographic and disease characteristics were examined by the means of independent t-test, one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation coefficient, as appropriate. All variables with p value < 0.25 in univariate analyses were chosen for multiple linear regression to determine the variables that were independently associated with global QOL. All tests of significance were two-sided and with p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic and disease characteristics of the participants

Total 117 patients were agreed to participate in this study out of 133 breast cancer patients defined by the inclusion and exclusion criteria (response rate = 88.0 %). A summary of the participants’ socio-demographic and disease characteristics are provided in the Table 1. More than half of the participants aged 50 years and above (61.6 %). The majority were Malay (58.1 %), followed by Chinese (29.9 %) and Indian (12.0 %). About 13 % of the participants reported that they had no formal education and 16.3 % had only primary education, while almost one-third (31.6 %) had a tertiary level of education. The majority of the participants were married (77.8 %). Of the total participants, half of them were housewife (53.8 %) followed by employed (31.6 %) and retired (14.5 %). Among the participants 41.0 % had a household income between RM2000 and RM4000.
Table 1

Socio-demographic and disease characteristics of participants (n = 117)

Socio-demographic and disease characteristicsTotal sample (117)
N%
Age
  < 40 years1613.7
 40–49 years2924.8
   > 50 years7261.6
Ethnicity
 Malay6858.1
 Chinese3529.9
 Indian1412.0
Educational level
 No formal education1512.8
 Primary1916.3
 Secondary4639.3
 Tertiary3731.6
Marital status
 Unmarried43.4
 Married9177.8
 Divorced/widowed2218.8
Employment status
 Housewife6353.8
 Employed3731.6
 Retired1714.5
Household income (RM)
 Less than 20004135.1
 2000 ─ 40004841.0
 More than 40002823.9
Time since diagnosis
  < 2 years5042.7
 2–5 years5042.7
  > 5 years1714.6
Stage at diagnosis
 Stage 086.8
 Stage I2420.5
 Stage II4336.8
 Stage III2823.9
 Stage IV1412.0
Type of surgery
 Breast conserving surgery3731.6
 Mastectomy8068.4
Radiotherapy
 Yes9480.3
 No2319.7
Chemotherapy
 Yes8471.8
 No3328.2
Hormone therapya
 Yes9279.3
 No2420.7
Immune therapya
 Yes2622.6
 No8977.4

aNumber of participants less than 117 (total respondents) due to non-response

Socio-demographic and disease characteristics of participants (n = 117) aNumber of participants less than 117 (total respondents) due to non-response About 43.0 % of the participants had been diagnosed with breast cancer less than 2 years ago. More than one-third of the participants (36.8 %) were diagnosed at stage II, followed by 23.9 % at stage III. While 20.5 % was diagnosed with stage I and others in stage IV. Regarding the treatment modalities, the majority of the participants (68.4 %) underwent mastectomy, 80.3 % received radiotherapy, 71.8 % had chemotherapy and 79.3 % had hormone therapy.

Most common unmet supportive care needs

The most commonly reported unmet supportive care needs were found all in the psychological domain, followed by physical domain. Table 2 represents the percentages of some unmet supportive care needs of individual items of SCNS-SF 34 among the participants. Most prevalent unmet supportive care needs in the psychological domain were uncertainty about the future (78.6 %), followed by fears about the cancer spreading (76.1 %), feelings of sadness (69.2 %), feelings about death and dying (68.4 %), concerns about the worries of those close to the patient (65.0 %), worries that the results of treatment are beyond control (65.0 %) and feeling down or depressed (65.0 %). Most prevalent unmet supportive care needs in the physical domain were feeling unwell a lot of the time (58.1 %), followed by lack of energy/tiredness (57.3 %) and pain (55.6 %). In the sexuality domain the most prevalent unmet supportive care need was changes in sexual relationships (35.0 %). In the patient care domain and health system information domain, the percentage of some unmet supportive care needs was very low except the choices about specialists the patients see (45.3 %).
Table 2

Some unmet supportive care needs of individual item of SCNS-SF 34 among the study sample

Some unmet supportive care needsN (%)
Physical
 Pain65 (55.6)
 Lack of energy/tiredness67 (57.3)
 Feeling unwell a lot of the time68 (58.1)
 Work around the home45 (38.5)
 Not being able to do the things you used to do43 (36.8)
Psychological
 Anxiety65 (55.6)
 Feeling down or depressed76 (65.0)
 Feelings of sadness81 (69.2)
 Fears about the cancer spreading89 (76.1)
 Worry that the results of treatment are beyond your control76 (65.0)
 Uncertainty about the future92 (78.6)
 Learning to feel in control of your situation55 (47.0)
 Keeping a positive outlook60 (51.3)
 Feelings about death and dying80 (68.4)
 Concerns about the worries of those close to you76 (65.0)
Sexuality
 Changes in sexual feelings40 (34.2)
 Changes in your sexual relationships41 (35.0)
 Being given information about sexual relationships25 (21.4)
Patient Care
 More choice about which cancer specialists you see53 (45.3)
 More choice about which hospital you attend42 (35.9)
 Reassurance by medical staff that the way you feel is normal38 (32.5)
 Hospital staff attending promptly to your physical needs35 (29.9)
 Hospital staff acknowledging, and showing sensitivity to, your feelings and emotional needs45 (38.5)
Health System Information
 Being given written information about the important aspects of your care14 (12.0)
 Being given information (written, diagrams, drawings) about aspects of managing your illness and side-effects at home32 (27.4)
 Being given explanations of those tests for which you would like explanations35 (29.9)
 Being adequately informed about the benefits and side-effects of treatments before you choose to have them27 (23.1)
 Being informed about your test results as soon as feasible14 (12.0)
 Being informed about cancer which is under control or diminishing (that is, remission)24 (20.5)
 Being informed about things you can do to help yourself to get well21 (17.9)
 Having access to professional counselling (e.g. psychologist, social worker, counsellor, nurse specialist) if you, family or friends need it17 (14.5)
 Being treated like a person not just another case25 (21.4)
 Being treated in a hospital or clinic that is as physically pleasant as possible20 (17.1)
 Having one member of hospital staff with whom you can talk to about all aspects of your condition, treatment and follow-up16 (13.7)
Some unmet supportive care needs of individual item of SCNS-SF 34 among the study sample Table 3 summarizes the mean and median score of the supportive care needs scale of SCNS-SF 34 among the participants. Among all the supportive care needs domain of SCNS-SF 34, psychological needs were observed to have the highest mean (53.31 ± 21.79), followed by physical needs (38.16 ± 27.15). The lowest mean score domain was observed in sexuality (27.78 ± 21.91). The mean score for the patient care needs was 37.65 (±16.45) and for health information needs was 31.53 (±12.17).
Table 3

Mean and median score of supportive care needs scale of SCNS-SF 34 among the study population

VariablesMean (+SD)Median (Range)
Physical needs38.16 (27.15)40 (0–100)
Psychological needs53.31 (21.79)52.50 (10–92.50)
Sexuality needs27.78 (21.91)25 (0–91.67)
Patient care needs37.65 (16.45)30 (25–85)
Health information needs31.53 (12.17)25 (20.45–77.27)
Mean and median score of supportive care needs scale of SCNS-SF 34 among the study population

Association between global QOL, participants’ characteristics and supportive care needs

Participants’ socio-demographic and disease characteristics as well as their supportive care needs were examined for their association with global QOL (Table 4). Multiple linear regression analyses, using those variables with p values < 0.25 in univariate analyses as candidate variables, revealed that time since diagnosis (β = 0.177; p value = 0.003), stage at diagnosis of breast cancer (β = -0.215; p value = 0.008), physical (β = -0.346; p value = 0.001) and psychological unmet needs (β = -0.218; p value = 0.004) were independently associated with QOL among the breast cancer patients. Early breast cancer survivors with advanced stage diagnosis who had greater physical and psychological needs were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with poor QOL. The adjuste R2 for this model was 0.780 that means 78.0 % variability of the outcome is explained by this model. The regression model was highly significant, p <0.001.
Table 4

Association between global quality of life, participants’ characteristics and supportive care needs

VariablesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysisa
Mean (SD) p valueBSEβ p value
Socio-demographic and disease characteristics
Age−0.2821.647−0.0110.864
  < 40 years79.69 (12.53)
 40–49 years71.26 (18.44)0.004
   > 50 years63.77 (19.08)
Ethnicity−0.0381.452−0.0020.979
 Malay61.15 (18.64)
 Chinese76.19 (14.23)0.001
 Indian77.38 (17.86)
Educational Level2.7851.9120.1460.148
 No formal education44.44 (12.06)
 Primary58.33 (20.41)0.001
 Secondary68.12 (15.34)
 Tertiary81.76 (10.90)
Marital Status0.9412.5920.0220.717
 Unmarried72.92 (15.77)
 Married69.96 (18.54)0.023
 Divorced/widowed57.95 (18.62)
Employment Status−2.7362.256−0.1040.228
 Housewife58.46 (17.74)
 Employed81.30 (11.01)0.001
 Retired73.04 (17.56)
Household Income (RM)3.2312.1760.1300.141
 Less than 200050.61 (13.61)
 RM2000- 400074.48 (15.41)0.001
 More than 400081.55 (11.19)
Time since Diagnosis4.7461.5730.1770.003
  < 2 years62.83 (19.21)
 2–5 years67.00 (18.43)0.001
  > 5 years84.80 (6.06)
Stage at Diagnosis−3.7761.385−0.2150.008
 Stage 079.16 (7.71)
 Stage 177.08 (12.83)
 Stage 270.73 (17.19)0.001
 Stage 365.18 (19.51)
 Stage 441.67 (10.34)
Type of Surgery−1.6682.947−0.0410.573
 Breast conserving surgery74.32 (12.79)0.011
 Mastectomy64.79 (20.54)
 Radiotherapy3.4994.9990.0740.486
 Yes64.45 (19.40)0.001
 No81.52 (7.08)
Chemotherapy−5.3054.173−0.1270.207
 Yes62.79 (19.59)0.001
 No80.55 (8.24)
Hormone therapy3.5024.0200.0750.386
 Yes64.67 (19.43)0.001
 No80.56 (9.41)
Immune therapy−3.3962.963−0.0750.255
 Yes75.96 (17.69)0.013
 No65.54 (18.81)
Unmet Supportive Care NeedsCorrelation coefficient
 Physical Needs−0.760.001−0.2410.070−0.3460.001
 Psychological Needs−0.800.001−0.1910.094−0.2180.004
 Sexuality Needs−0.060.553NSNSNSNS
 Patient’s Care Needs−0.440.001−0.0280.103−0.0240.787
 Health Information Needs−0.160.0920.0090.1220.0060.941

aMultiple linear regression model included 117 participants with complete covariate information

B: Regression coefficient, SE: Standard error of regression coefficient, β: Standardized regression coefficient, NS: Not significant and not being entered into multiple linear regression (p value > 0.25), p value < 0.05 is considered as statistically significant

Association between global quality of life, participants’ characteristics and supportive care needs aMultiple linear regression model included 117 participants with complete covariate information B: Regression coefficient, SE: Standard error of regression coefficient, β: Standardized regression coefficient, NS: Not significant and not being entered into multiple linear regression (p value > 0.25), p value < 0.05 is considered as statistically significant In summary, the most common unmet supportive care needs were found to be in the psychological domain. Early breast cancer survivors, diagnosed at an advanced stage who had greater physical and psychological needs were likely to have a poorer quality of life.

Discussion

This is the first study addressing the supportive care needs of breast cancer patients in Malaysia. It reveals a multitude of unmet supportive care needs of breast cancer patients in all the domains with highest prevalence in the psychological domain, followed by physical, patient care needs, health information and lowest in sexuality domain. The most prevalent unmet psychological needs of the breast cancer patients reported in this study were uncertainty about the future, fears about the cancer spreading, feelings of sadness, feelings about death and dying, concerns about those close to the patient, worry that the results of treatment are beyond control and feeling down or depressed. In western countries unmet needs were highest in psychological domain which is consistent with the findings of this study [36, 42, 43]. Whereas in Asian developing countries unmet needs were mostly related to health system information [17, 44–47]. As a matter of fact, supportive care needs are the product of perspective of culture and interaction of psychology based on cultural context [30]. With the westernization, the perception of cancer and unmet needs of the cancer patients has been changing over few decades in Malaysia [48]. It should also be noted that most of the breast cancer patients in this study had completed their initial course of treatment less than 5 years ago and it is possible that the psychological supportive care needs had not dissipated by the time they participated in the study. It has found that psychological distress of breast cancer patients were higher among those with survival duration of less than 5 years than those with long-term survival more than 5 years [29]. Nevertheless, in Malaysian healthcare settings, providing services of psychosocial components of care for cancer patients are not yet well established [48]. Incorporation of psychosocial components of care in the routine cancer care delivery in healthcare settings is crucial and can be challenging as there is no existing training, guidelines and strategies for the healthcare providers in Malaysia. Studies suggest that addressing psychological needs can have a great role in helping women with breast cancer in the long-term adjustment process and improving their QOL [28, 49, 50]. Particularly amongst various types of physical needs, breast cancer patients had stronger needs in their physical strength and dealing with pain. These could be the residual side effects or late onset symptoms of breast cancer treatment which should be monitored timely to characterize the level of unmet needs over time. There is a growing volume of literatures which support the proposition that lack of physical strength and pain are the critical physical needs among the breast cancer patients throughout the period of treatment and survivorship [8, 51]. The experience of these persistent symptoms and morbidities as well as associated unmet needs could significantly hamper their QOL and successful transition from early to long-term survivorship [4]. These findings have important clinical implication in providing timely and appropriate physical rehabilitation depending on the needs in healthcare setting after the initial course of breast cancer treatment. In Malaysian healthcare system, breast cancer patients have a regular access to healthcare professionals during their therapy and in the post treatment period, which develops confidence over the clinical team concerning the treatment [52]. Therefore, the patient care and health system and information needs might seem to be very low except many had a need to have more choices concerning the cancer specialists they see. A possible explanation could be a divergence between their expectations to have more opinions for the assurance that quickly they would cope up and come back to normal life. Congruent with other studies, it was expected to find sexuality domain as least unmet needs in this study [44, 53]. However, the findings may not reflect the actual status in a conservative society like Malaysia where conservative cultural values consider talking about sexuality is embarrassing [54]. Moreover, this would eventually make patients to perceive that sexuality is a low priority despite having certain sexual problems. Although impairment in sexual functioning has significant negative impact on psychological well-being and QOL [55, 56]. In multivariate analysis, the results showed that early breast cancer survivors diagnosed at an advanced stage with higher levels of physical and psychological unmet needs were more likely to have an overall poor QOL. Breast cancer patients with late stage diagnosis invariably require a lengthy and complicated course of treatment [4, 6, 8]. As seen in other studies, the unanticipated side effects and the struggle through the lengthy and disruptive treatment procedure might give rise to the psychological and physical difficulties to the breast cancer patients [4, 36, 44, 46, 57–59]. It is not unlikely that poor psychological adjustment might enhance physical disability or vice versa [33]. The complicated long-term treatment which led to physical and psychological sufferings makes early breast cancer survivors’ lives miserable. Breast cancer patients certainly need time to get over the burdens of side effects of the long-term treatment [3, 12]. Therefore, continuous and timely psychological support and physical rehabilitation may have contributed to reduce their chronic sufferings, helped them with the adjustment process over and after the course of long-term treatment and could possibly enhance their QOL. This study had several limitations. The research was conducted to the surgery and oncology outpatients of a single large government academic hospital, which limits the applicability of the findings to the breast cancer patients all over Malaysia. The patients were recruited by universal sampling, which led to sampling bias. Several types of response bias may also be possible while collecting data. Acquiescence bias is one of those where participants tend to answer questions affirmatively when they have doubts. Another is a central tendency bias where participants tend to avoid extreme scores and give response towards the centre of the scale range. Questions on sexuality may not have been answered truthfully due to cultural barriers which may cause information bias.

Conclusion

The unmet needs among the breast cancer patients were found predominant in the psychological and physical domain. Hence, most prevalent unmet needs were found in the psychological domain. Early breast cancer survivors with late stage diagnosis, who had greater unmet needs in the physical and psychological domains were more likely to have a poor QOL. The research findings provide comprehensive insight into unmet needs of breast cancer patients across a range of domains for well-directed and effective management in clinical-follow up. However, it emphasizes that rendering timely and appropriate psychological and physical rehabilitation programmes in healthcare setting ought to be the highest priority to support them in the long-term adjustment process and ensure a better QOL.
  49 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients living in urban and rural/regional areas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Phyllis N Butow; Fiona Phillips; Janine Schweder; Kate White; Craig Underhill; David Goldstein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Efficacy and medical cost offset of psychosocial interventions in cancer care: making the case for economic analyses.

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Barry D Bultz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis and survival.

Authors:  Meira Epplein; Ying Zheng; Wei Zheng; Zhi Chen; Kai Gu; David Penson; Wei Lu; Xiao-Ou Shu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Unmet spiritual care needs impact emotional and spiritual well-being in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Michelle J Pearce; April D Coan; James E Herndon; Harold G Koenig; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Breast cancer prevention and control programs in Malaysia.

Authors:  Maznah Dahlui; Sofea Ramli; Awang M Bulgiba
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011

6.  Breast cancer in a multi-ethnic Asian setting: results from the Singapore-Malaysia hospital-based breast cancer registry.

Authors:  Nirmala Bhoo Pathy; Cheng Har Yip; Nur Aishah Taib; Mikael Hartman; Nakul Saxena; Philip Iau; Awang M Bulgiba; Soo Chin Lee; Siew Eng Lim; John E L Wong; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  The cognitive effects of chemotherapy in post-menopausal breast cancer patients: a controlled longitudinal study.

Authors:  Felice A Tager; Paula S McKinley; Freya R Schnabel; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Ying Keun K Cheung; Yixin Fang; Claire R Golden; Margery E Frosch; Ulya Habif; Margaret M Mulligan; Ivy S Chen; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  M J Hjermstad; S D Fossa; K Bjordal; S Kaasa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Assessment of needs, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with care in breast cancer patients to better target supportive care.

Authors:  A Brédart; J-L Kop; A-C Griesser; C Fiszer; K Zaman; B Panes-Ruedin; W Jeanneret; J-F Delaloye; S Zimmers; V Berthet; S Dolbeault
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Supportive care of rural women with breast cancer in Tasmania, Australia: changing needs over time.

Authors:  Melinda Minstrell; Tania Winzenberg; Nicole Rankin; Clarissa Hughes; Judi Walker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  27 in total

1.  Unmet needs in the physical and daily living domain mediates the influence of symptom experience on the quality of life of gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Sun Young Rha; Hyo Jin Lee; Jiyeon Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Personalizing post-treatment cancer care: a cross-sectional survey of the needs and preferences of well survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Y Y Kwan; J Croke; T Panzarella; K Ubhi; A Fyles; A Koch; R Dinniwell; W Levin; D McCready; C Chung; F Liu; J L Bender
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Psychometric testing of the Mandarin version of the 34-item Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey in patients with cancer in mainland China.

Authors:  Yuan Han; Ying Zhou; Jing Wang; Qian Zhao; Huiying Qin; Yuying Fan; Yalan Song; Allison Boyes; Shuzhong Cui
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  The Factors for Success and Lack of Success in the Breast Cancer Patient Care Pathway: A Qualitative Study From the Health Care Staff Perspective.

Authors:  Eija Metsälä; Tanja Schroderus-Salo; Kjersti Straume; Bergliot Strom; Laurent Marmy; Mona Øynes; José A Pires Jorge; Liis Randle; Siret Kivistik
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Effect of chemotherapy counseling by pharmacists on quality of life and psychological outcomes of oncology patients in Malaysia: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Ummavathy Periasamy; Sherina Mohd Sidik; Lekhraj Rampal; Siti Irma Fadhilah; Mehrnoosh Akhtari-Zavare; Rozi Mahmud
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 6.  Pattern and Predictors of Unmet Supportive Care Needs in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Paul T Okediji; Omolola Salako; Olamijulo O Fatiregun
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-09

Review 7.  Health-related quality of life in Asian patients with breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peh Joo Ho; Sofie A M Gernaat; Mikael Hartman; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Unmet needs in Iranian cancer patients.

Authors:  Elahe Ramezanzade Tabriz; Zohre Parsa Yekta; Sara Shirdelzade; Masume Saadati; Arezoo Orooji; Hooman Shahsavari; Mehdi Khorshidi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-06-29

9.  Effectiveness of a multimodal standard nursing program on health-related quality of life in Chinese mainland female patients with breast cancer: protocol for a single-blind cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kaina Zhou; Duolao Wang; Xiaole He; Lanting Huo; Jinghua An; Minjie Li; Wen Wang; Xiaomei Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Changes in Health- Related Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-being of Breast Cancer Survivors: Findings fromzzm321990a Group- Based Intervention Program in Malaysia

Authors:  Nisha Angela Dominic; Valliammai Jayanthi Thirunavuk Arasoo; Nevein Philip Botross; Amgad Riad; Cindy Biding; Amutha Ramadas
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.