Literature DB >> 23244672

Association between unmet needs and quality of life of cancer patients: a population-based study.

Dorte Gilså Hansen1, Pia Veldt Larsen, Lise Vilstrup Holm, Nina Rottmann, Stinne Holm Bergholdt, Jens Søndergaard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two conceptually different morbidity outcomes unmet needs and health-related quality of life are used to identify cancer patients in need of clinical attention and to evaluate rehabilitation programmes. The knowledge on the interrelation between unmet needs and health-related quality of life is scarce. This paper studies the hypothesis that patient-perceived unmet needs of rehabilitation during the cancer trajectory are associated with decreased quality of life.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on registers, a Danish population-based cohort of adult, incident, mixed-site cancer patients diagnosed between 1 October 2007 and 30 September 2008 was established. At 14 months following diagnosis participants completed a questionnaire including health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ C-30), psychological distress (POMS-SF), and unmet needs with regard to physical, emotional, family-oriented, sexual, work-related, and financial problems. Unmet needs were assessed through six ad hoc questions.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were received from 3439 of 4947 patients, resulting in a response rate of 70%. The three most frequent cancer types were breast (28.4%), prostate (14.6%) and colorectal cancer (15.2%). Overall, 60.1% expressed an unmet need of rehabilitation in at least one area, physical and emotional problems being the most frequent (40.0% and 37.5%). For all scales of the EORTC QLQ C-30 and POMS, significant adjusted mean differences were observed between patients with unmet needs in at least one area and patients with no unmet needs (p-values < 0.001). These differences were well above levels usually considered clinically relevant. Further, impairment increased with increasing number of areas in which unmet needs were reported. DISCUSSION: We confirmed the hypothesis that patient-perceived unmet needs of rehabilitation during the cancer trajectory are associated with decreased quality of life. This study supports the use of unmet needs questions to identify patients in need of clinical attention. Interventions reducing cancer patients' perceived needs of rehabilitation may enhance quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23244672     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.742204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  32 in total

1.  Completing a Questionnaire at Home Prior to Needs Assessment in General Practice: A Qualitative Study of Cancer Patients' Experience.

Authors:  Susanne Thayssen; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Jens Søndergaard; Mette Terp Høybye; Palle Mark Christensen; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Can models of self-management support be adapted across cancer types? A comparison of unmet self-management needs for patients with breast or colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Elise Mansfield; Lisa Mackenzie; Mariko Carey; Kerry Peek; Jan Shepherd; Tiffany-Jane Evans
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Older Adults with Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Occupational and Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Mackenzi Pergolotti; Allison M Deal; Grant R Williams; Ashley L Bryant; Lauren McCarthy; Kirsten A Nyrop; Kelley R Covington; Bryce B Reeve; Ethan Basch; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nurse-Led Supportive Care Package (SurvivorCare) for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Karla Gough; Allison Drosdowsky; Lahiru Russell; Sanchia Aranda; Phyllis Butow; Jo Phipps-Nelson; Jane Young; Mei Krishnasamy; Anna Ugalde; Dorothy King; Andrew Strickland; Michael Franco; Robert Blum; Catherine Johnson; Vinod Ganju; Jeremy Shapiro; Geoffrey Chong; Julie Charlton; Andrew Haydon; Penelope Schofield
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-06-15

5.  Understanding Quality of Life in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury Via SCI-Related Needs and Secondary Complications.

Authors:  Shane N Sweet; Luc Noreau; Jean Leblond; Frédéric S Dumont
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014

Review 6.  Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Systems for Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Antonio Melillo; Andrea Chirico; Giuseppe De Pietro; Luigi Gallo; Giuseppe Caggianese; Daniela Barone; Michelino De Laurentiis; Antonio Giordano
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  A randomized controlled trial of outpatient CAncer REhabilitation for older adults: The CARE Program.

Authors:  Mackenzi Pergolotti; Allison M Deal; Grant R Williams; Ashley L Bryant; Bryce B Reeve; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Is health-related quality of life between 90 and 180 days following stroke associated with long-term unmet needs?

Authors:  N E Andrew; M F Kilkenny; N A Lannin; D A Cadilhac
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Readiness for cancer rehabilitation in Denmark: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed methods study.

Authors:  Maria Kristiansen; Lis Adamsen; Carsten Hendriksen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Identifying functional impairment and rehabilitation needs in patients newly diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer: a structured literature review.

Authors:  Joanne Louise Bayly; Mari Lloyd-Williams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.