| Literature DB >> 34822605 |
Malihe Mehdizadeh Allaf1, Charles G Trick1,2.
Abstract
Harmful algal blooms are a significant environmental problem. Cells that bloom are often associated with intercellular or dissolved toxins that are a grave concern to humans. However, cells may also excrete compounds that are beneficial to their competition, allowing the cells to establish or maintain cells in bloom conditions. Here, we develop a yeast cell assay to assess whether the bloom-forming species can change the toxicity of the water environment. The current methods of assessing toxicity involve whole organisms. Here, yeast cells are used as a bioassay model to evaluate eukaryotic cell toxicity. Yeast is a commonly used, easy to maintain bioassay species that is free from ethical concerns, yet is sensitive to a wide array of metabolic and membrane-modulating agents. Compared to methods in which the whole organism is used, this method offers rapid and convenient cytotoxicity measurements using a lower volume of samples. The flow cytometer was employed in this toxicology assessment to measure the number of dead cells using alive/dead stain analysis. The results show that yeast cells were metabolically damaged after 1 h of exposure to our model toxin-producing euryhaline flagellates (Heterosigma akashiwo and Prymnesium parvum) cells or extracts. This amount was increased by extending the incubation time.Entities:
Keywords: Heterosigma akashiwo; Prymnesium parvum; bioassay; harmful algal blooms; yeast
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34822605 PMCID: PMC8623749 DOI: 10.3390/toxins13110821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Yeast mortality (%) after exposure to different sample treatments of H. akashiwo and P. parvum (n = 3 ± SD).
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for H. akashiwo and P. parvum toxicity measurement.
| Algae | Source | Remark | Sum of Squares | Degree of Freedom | Mean Square | f-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Time | † Sig. | 994.76 | 1 | 994.76 | 56.21 | <0.001 |
| § Treat. | Sig. | 40,758.84 | 10 | 4075.88 | 230.29 | <0.001 | |
| Time × Treat. | Sig. | 1358.04 | 10 | 135.80 | 7.67 | <0.001 | |
| Residual | 778.75 | 44 | 17.7 | ||||
|
| Time | Sig. | 247.58 | 1 | 247.58 | 6.37 | 0.015 |
| Treat. | Sig. | 51,661.38 | 10 | 5166.14 | 132.85 | <0.001 | |
| Time × Treat. | ‡ N-Sig | 302.93 | 10 | 30.29 | 0.78 | 0.648 | |
| Residual | 1711.04 | 44 | 38.89 |
† Sig = Significant; ‡ N-Sig = Non-significant; § Treat. = Treatment.
Figure 2Comparison between highest yeast mortality (%) in the presence of H. akashiwo and P. parvum after 3 h incubation.
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the four highest effective treatments of H. akashiwo and P. parvum.
| Source | Remark | Sum of Squares | Degree of Freedom | Mean Square | f-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| † Algal species | Nonsignificant | 1.397 | 1 | 1.397 | 0.0130 | 0.911 |
| ** Treatment | Significant | 1840.645 | 3 | 613.548 | 5.697 | 0.008 |
| Algal species × Treatment | Significant | 2721.014 | 3 | 907.005 | 8.422 | 0.001 |
| Residual | 1723.203 | 16 | 107.700 |
† Algal species = Heterosigma akashiwo and Prymnesium parvum. ** Treatments = Sample D, E, G, I.
Figure 3Summary of algal samples preparation.