Literature DB >> 34820767

The item-specific proportion congruency effect can be contaminated by short-term repetition priming.

Brett A Cochrane1, Jay Pratt2.   

Abstract

The item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effect reflects the phenomenon that Stroop congruency effects are larger for Stroop items that are more likely to be congruent (MC) than incongruent (MI). While the ISPC effect is purported to reflect long-term memory associations, the proportion manipulation entails that stimulus repetitions vary as a function of the MC and MI conditions, suggesting that a short-term repetition priming process may also contribute. In the present study, we investigated whether the ISPC effect reflected contributions from separate long-term associative learning and short-term repetition priming processes. To do so, the magnitude of the ISPC effect was compared when stimulus repetitions were present and absent. While the ISPC effect was robust, it was revealed that removing stimulus repetitions significantly attenuated the effect. Overall, the present study indicates the ISPC effect can reflect contributions from both short-term repetition and long-term memory processes.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congruency sequence effect; Item-specific proportion congruency effect; Repetition priming; Stroop task

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34820767     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02403-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  10 in total

1.  Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Larry L Jacoby; Swati Chanani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks.

Authors:  Evan F Risko; Chris Blais; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Derek Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Andrew J Aschenbrenner
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2019-06-19

5.  Beyond trial-by-trial adaptation: A quantification of the time scale of cognitive control.

Authors:  Bart Aben; Tom Verguts; Eva Van den Bussche
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Abhishek Dey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Resolved but not forgotten: Stroop conflict dredges up the past.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-20

10.  The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition.

Authors:  Carina G Giesen; James R Schmidt; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-15
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Accounting for Proportion Congruency Effects in the Stroop Task in a Confounded Setup: Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Episodes Explains it All.

Authors:  Klaus Rothermund; Nathalie Gollnick; Carina G Giesen
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-06-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.