Literature DB >> 31697156

The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects.

Brett A Cochrane1, Bruce Milliken1.   

Abstract

Repetition of target features in the same spatial location can either benefit or impair performance in perceptual tasks. Moreover, which of these two effects occurs can depend on whether an intervening event is presented temporally between consecutive targets. Here, we explored these effects for color feature repetitions by varying the representational overlap of consecutive targets. The second target on all experimental trials was a simple perceptual color. The task and first target were manipulated to vary the representation produced in response to the first target (perceptual representation of color in Experiment 1; imagined representation of color in Experiments 2 and 5; conceptual representation of color in Experiment 3; color-unrelated representation in Experiment 4). Perceptual and imagined color representations for the first target produced a positive repetition effect when an intervening event did not appear between targets but produced a negative repetition effect when an intervening event did appear between targets. In contrast, conceptual color and color-unrelated representations produced a negative repetition effect both with and without an intervening event. These results suggest that positive repetition effects depend on consecutive targets that share visual representations, whereas negative repetition effects reflect a more complex relationship between stimulus and response features across targets. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Year:  2019        PMID: 31697156     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  Comparing imagery and perception: Using eye movements to dissociate mechanisms in search.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Chao Wang; Jay Pratt; Bruce Milliken; Hong-Jin Sun
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Looking into the mind's eye: Directed and evaluated imagery vividness modulates imagery-perception congruency effects.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Vanessa Ng; Anisha Khosla; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  The item-specific proportion congruency effect can be contaminated by short-term repetition priming.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  It hurts more than it helps: Cuing T1 with imagery can impair T2 identification in an attentional blink task.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Ben Sclodnick; Ellen MacLellan; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response.

Authors:  Diana B Galarraga; Jay Pratt; Brett A Cochrane
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.143

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.