Literature DB >> 34812545

Prediction of femoral head coverage from articulated statistical shape models of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Penny R Atkins1,2, Praful Agrawal1, Joseph D Mozingo2, Keisuke Uemura2,3, Kunihiko Tokunaga4, Christopher L Peters2, Shireen Y Elhabian1,5, Ross T Whitaker1,5, Andrew E Anderson1,2,6,7.   

Abstract

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is commonly described as reduced femoral head coverage due to anterolateral acetabular deficiency. Although reduced coverage is the defining trait of DDH, more subtle and localized anatomic features of the joint are also thought to contribute to symptom development and degeneration. These features are challenging to identify using conventional approaches. Herein, we assessed the morphology of the full femur and hemi-pelvis using an articulated statistical shape model (SSM). The model determined the morphological and pose-based variations associated with DDH in a population of Japanese females and established which of these variations predict coverage. Computed tomography (CT) images of 83 hips from 47 patients were segmented for input into a correspondence-based SSM. The dominant modes of variation in the model initially represented scale and pose. After removal of these factors through individual bone alignment, femoral version and neck-shaft angle, pelvic curvature, and acetabular version dominated the observed variation. Femoral head oblateness and prominence of the acetabular rim and various muscle attachment sites of the femur and hemi-pelvis were found to predict 3D CT-based coverage measurements (R2  = 0.5-0.7 for the full bones, R2  = 0.9 for the joint). Statement of Clinical Significance: Currently, clinical measurements of DDH only consider the morphology of the acetabulum. However, the results of this study demonstrated that variability in femoral head shape and several muscle attachment sites were predictive of femoral head coverage. These morphological differences may provide insight into improved clinical diagnosis and surgical planning based on functional adaptations of patients with DDH.
© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational morphometrics; developmental dysplasia; hip joint; morphology; statistical shape modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34812545      PMCID: PMC9124729          DOI: 10.1002/jor.25227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.102


  41 in total

1.  Can measurements from an anteroposterior radiograph predict pelvic sagittal inclination?

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Penny R Atkins; Masashi Okamoto; Kunihiko Tokunaga; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Predicting OA progression to total hip replacement: can we do better than risk factors alone using active shape modelling as an imaging biomarker?

Authors:  Rebecca J Barr; Jennifer S Gregory; David M Reid; Richard M Aspden; Kanako Yoshida; Gillian Hosie; Alan J Silman; Salvatore Alesci; Gary J Macfarlane
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  Evaluation of femoral head coverage following Chiari pelvic osteotomy in adolescents by three-dimensional computed tomography and conventional radiography.

Authors:  LianYong Li; JingYu Jia; Qun Zhao; LiJun Zhang; ShiJun Ji; EnBo Wang
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Three-dimensional Assessment of Femoral Head Coverage in Normal and Dysplastic Hips: A Novel Method.

Authors:  Dai Miyasaka; Tomoyuki Ito; Norio Imai; Ken Suda; Izumi Minato; Yoichiro Dohmae; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Acta Med Okayama       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.892

Review 5.  Patient selection criteria for periacetabular osteotomy or rotational acetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Three-dimensional femoral head coverage in the standing position represents that measured in vivo during gait.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Penny R Atkins; Steve A Maas; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.414

7.  The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  N Sugano; P C Noble; E Kamaric; J K Salama; T Ochi; H S Tullos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-07

8.  Hip Kinematics During Single-Leg Tasks in People With and Without Hip-Related Groin Pain and the Association Among Kinematics, Hip Muscle Strength, and Bony Morphology.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Travis J Hillen; Paul K Commean; Michael D Harris; Michael J Mueller; John C Clohisy; Gretchen B Salsich
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Multi-joint biomechanics during sloped walking in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Linda R Van Dillen; Jacqueline N Foody; Paige E Burnet; John C Clohisy; Ling Chen; Michael D Harris
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 10.  Curved periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Masatoshi Naito; Yoshinari Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.